General obligations of flag States
1 It is the responsibility of flag States to ensure that they establish and maintain
measures for the effective application and enforcement of the IMO instruments to which
they are a Party. From the point of view of flag State implementation the most
significant IMO instruments are:
-
.1 the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974
(SOLAS 74), as amended;
-
.2 the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from
Ships, 1973, as modified by the Protocol of 1978 relating thereto (MARPOL
73/78), as amended;
-
.3 the International Convention on Load Lines, 1966 (LL
66) as amended;
-
.4 the International Convention on Standards of Training,
Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978 (STCW
78), as amended;
-
.5 the Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing
Collisions at Sea, 1972, (COLREG 72), as amended; and
-
.6 the International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969
(TONNAGE 69).
Regard should also be given to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982
(UNCLOS).
2 Having accepted an instrument, a Government is bound by the provisions of the
instrument to promulgate laws in relation to the implementation of its provisions
through appropriate national legislation (e.g. SOLAS 74 article I(b)). The undertaking
to give effect to the provisions of the relevant instrument (e.g. SOLAS 74 article I(a))
means that the Government must have a functioning legislative body to enact laws for
ships flying its flag and to provide for the subsequent implementation and enforcement
of those laws.
Internal criteria for the assessment of flag State performance
3 "Internal" criteria are criteria which are directly relevant to the operation of
the flag State as an Administration and are designed to give a clear indication of the
effectiveness of a flag State Administration in fulfilling its obligations under the
instruments. Guidance on flag State responsibilities is contained in Assembly resolution
A.847(20) on Guidelines to assist flag States in the implementation of IMO instruments.
Article 94 of UNCLOS also sets out the duties of State Parties (Article 1.2(1)). Article
217 of UNCLOS is also relevant in detailing the enforcement responsibilities of flag
States. Based on international instruments, a flag State has responsibilities relating,
in particular, to setting legal requirements to give national effect to the instruments
to which it is a Party; enforcement of those requirements; authorization of
organizations acting on its behalf and casualty investigation. These are considered in
more detail below.
Legal framework
4 A flag State should:
-
.1 take measures to ensure safety at sea and pollution prevention for ships
entitled to fly its flag with regard to:
-
.1.1 the construction, equipment and management of ships;
-
.1.2 the principles and rules with respect to the limits to which ships may be
loaded;
-
.1.3 the prevention, reduction and control of pollution of the marine environment
and the minimization of the impact of accidental discharges of pollutants;
-
.1.4 the manning of ships and the training of crews; and
-
.1.5 the safety of navigation (including taking part in mandatory reporting and
routeing systems), maintenance of communications and prevention of
collisions;
-
.2 promulgate laws which permit effective jurisdiction and control in
administrative, technical and social matters over ships flying its flag and, in
particular, relating to the inspection of ships, safety and pollution prevention
laws applying to such ships and the making of associated regulations; and
-
.3 promulgate laws providing the legal basis for the establishment of a registry
and maintain a register of ships flying its flag.
Enforcement
5 A flag State should:
-
.1 provide for the enforcement of its national laws, including the associated
investigative and penalty processes;
-
.2 take appropriate action against ships flying its flag that fail to comply with
applicable requirements;
-
.3 ensure the availability of sufficient personnel with maritime and technical
expertise to carry out its flag State responsibilities, including:
-
.3.1 the development and enforcement of necessary national laws;
-
.3.2 the establishment and maintenance of minimum safe manning levels on board
ships flying its flag and the provision of effective certification of
seafarers;
-
.3.3 the inspection of ships flying its flag to ensure compliance with the
requirements of international instruments to which the flag State is a
Party;
-
.3.4 the reporting of casualties and incidents as required by the respective
instruments; and
-
.3.5 the investigation of circumstances following any detention of ships flying
its flag.
Responsibility of recognized organizations acting on behalf of the
Administration
6 In cases where a flag State authorizes third party organizations to act on
its behalf, i.e. recognized organizations, any delegation of authority to these
recognized organizations must be clearly recorded and should follow as a minimum the
Guidelines for the authorization of organizations acting on behalf of the Administration
(resolution A.739(18)) and the Specifications on the survey and certification
functions of recognized organizations acting on behalf of the Administration (resolution A.789(19)). The requirements of SOLAS regulation I/6(c), and the
analogous requirements of MARPOL 73/78 should be included in any delegation of authority.
The flag State must also take full responsibility for all safety and pollution
prevention certificates issued under the relevant instruments by it or on its
behalf.
Casualty and incident investigation
7 A flag State should undertake prompt and thorough casualty and incident investigations
and submit relevant reports to IMO, as appropriate.
External criteria for the assessment of flag State performance
8 "External" criteria refer to information, in particular port State control data
and casualty accident data, which may also be taken to be indicators of the way in which
a flag State is performing. The following are indicators of the way in which the flag
State is performing but do not relate directly to the organization of the flag State's
Administration. When used as indicators, the criteria listed in .1 to .5 should be
considered in proportion to the overall number of ships flying its flag, subject to
international instruments to which the State is a Party:
-
.1 Number of accidents, casualties and incidents reportable to IMO in terms of
the requirements of the international casualty database.
-
.2 Number of accidents involving personal injuries leading to absence from duty
of 3 days or more on board ships flying the flag of the State concerned.
-
.3 Number of lives lost on its ships resulting from the operation of ships flying
its flag.
-
.4 Number of ships lost.
-
.5 Number of incidents of loss of pollutants into the sea according
to MARPOL 73/78 reporting standards, including a measure of the
seriousness of the incidents.
-
.6 Number of ships detained by other States under port State control
procedures.
-
.7 Communication to IMO of information required in mandatory instruments.
Self-assessment form
9 Based on the internal and external criteria outlined above, a self-assessment form is
attached. The primary objective of the form is to assist flag States in assessing their
performance against these criteria. Questions relating to the STCW Convention have not
been included because that instrument has its own assessment procedures.