| 1 FLAG STATE INFORMATION
|
| 1 Name of flag
State:
|
| 2 Full contact
details for the designated single point of contact:
|
| Name and title:
|
|
| Address:
|
|
| Telephone
No.:
|
| Fax
No.:
|
| Email
address:
|
| 3 Organization
recognized by flag State:
|
| 2 RECOGNIZED ORGANIZATION
INFORMATION
|
| 1 Name of
recognized organization:
|
| 2 Full contact
details for the designated single point of contact:
|
| Name and title:
|
|
| Address:
|
|
| Telephone
No.:
|
| Fax
No.:
|
| Email
address:
|
| 3 Rules coverage:
|
Oil tanker Bulk
carrier
|
| 3 SELF-ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
|
| Functional requirement
|
Fully
covered in rules
|
Not
covered in rules
|
Comments
|
| Design
|
| 1 Design life
|
|
|
|
| 2 Environmental conditions
|
|
|
|
| 3 Structural strength
|
|
|
|
| 4 Fatigue life
|
|
|
|
| 5 Residual strength
|
|
|
|
| 6 Protection against corrosion
|
|
|
|
| 6.1 Coating life
|
|
|
|
| 6.2 Corrosion addition
|
|
|
|
| 7 Structural redundancy
|
|
|
|
| 8 Watertight and weathertight
integrity
|
|
|
|
| 9 Human element considerations
|
|
|
|
| 10 Design transparency
|
|
|
|
| Construction
|
| 11 Construction quality
procedures
|
|
|
|
| 12 Survey during construction
|
|
|
|
| In-service considerations
|
| 13 Survey and maintenance
|
|
|
|
| 14 Structural accessibility
|
|
|
|
| Recycling considerations
|
| 15 Recycling
|
|
|
|
Note: The Submitter declares that the above Self-Assessment Summary Table has been
compiled without infringing any confidential and/or proprietary information and
represents a true self-assessment of the rules submitted for verification with
the GBS functional requirements.
4 RULE LINKAGE SUMMARY TABLE
1 (Title and text of the relevant functional requirement)
1.1 (Text of the Statement of intent)
| Information and documentation requirement
|
Regulation submitted
(2)
|
Rule type (3)
|
Reference (4)
|
| 1.2.1
|
(Text)
(1)
|
|
|
|
Justification (If applicable) (5):
| Evaluation criterion
|
Summarized comment
(7)
|
Satisfied by rules
(8)
|
Rule linkage (9)
|
| 1.3.1
|
(Text)
(6)
|
|
(YES/NO)
|
|
Detailed technical explanation (10):
| Information and documentation requirement
|
Regulation submitted
(2)
|
Rule type (3)
|
Reference (4)
|
| 1.2(n)
|
(Text)
(1)
|
|
|
|
Justification (If applicable) (5):
| Evaluation criterion
|
Summarized comment
(7)
|
Satisfied by rules
(8)
|
Rule linkage (9)
|
| 1.3(n)
|
(Text)
(6)
|
|
(YES/NO)
|
|
Detailed technical explanation (10):
Note: The Submitter declares that the above Rule Linkage Summary Table has been
compiled without infringing any confidential and/or proprietary information and
represents a true reflection of its rules in relation to the GBS functional
requirements.
Notes:
Section 4 of the submission template should be filled for each information and
documentation element and its associated evaluation criterion, for each functional
requirement.
(1) Copy text of the relevant information and documentation requirement established
in the Guidelines.
(2) Indicate the file name or internet link or title of the hard copy where the
information/documentation provided is found in the documentation package.
(3) Specify type of information/documentation provided (public rule, internal
procedure, unified requirement, guidelines, etc.).
(4) Indicate the reference in the rules where the information is found.
(5) Develop the justification required. If a justification is not required, detailed
technical explanation should be submitted in any case.
(6) Copy text of the evaluation criterion established in the Guidelines for the
relevant information and documentation requirement.
(7) Include a short comment explaining why the relevant evaluation criterion is
satisfied.
(8) Indicate if the relevant evaluation criterion is satisfied by rules according to
self-assessment.
(9) Specify all the rules locations where the relevant criterion is applied.
(10) Provide a technical explanation showing why the evaluation criterion is said to
be satisfied or why it is not satisfied.