3 Doors larger than those in section 1 above, but not exceeding 50% in surface area
Clasification Society 2024 - Version 9.40
Statutory Documents - IMO Publications and Documents - Circulars - Maritime Safety Committee - MSC.1/Circular.1319 – Recommendation for the Evaluation of Fire Performance and Approval of Large Fire Doors – (11 June 2009) - Annex – Recommendation for the Evaluation of Fire Performance and Approval of Large Fire Doors - 3 Doors larger than those in section 1 above, but not exceeding 50% in surface area

3 Doors larger than those in section 1 above, but not exceeding 50% in surface area

  3.1 An engineering assessment can be used to extrapolate the fire test results of a door having a larger geometry than the tested door.

  3.2 Such an assessment should be used for verification only if the dimensions of the actual door are greater than the maximum permitted by the furnace (considering a furnace with an aperture of 2,440 mm width x 2,500 mm height) and the door involved has already been tested, with such dimensions, with satisfactory results in accordance with section 1 above, and the actual door does not exceed 50% in surface area.

  3.3 The methodology used to extrapolate the fire tests results should consider the following three steps:

  • .1 standard fire test of the “specimen” to obtain reference temperature and structural displacements. Such a “specimen” may be either:

    • .1.1 a door already certified through the fire test which is identical in design to the door to be analysed (fire test to include additional instrumentation as per paragraph 3.4.2, or equivalent arrangement); or

    • .1.2 a specially-built specimen where the finite element method is to be performed to extrapolate the results of a specimen of an actual door having a size exceeding the maximum size allowed by the furnace of the testing laboratory; the specimen should be a mock-up of the actual door, but having a size that fits in the furnace;

  • .2 finite element analysis in paragraph 3.6, of the “specimen” to calibrate the thermal and mechanical boundary conditions of the FEM model, which are adjusted until the numerical and experimental temperature and displacement distribution compare satisfactorily; and

  • .3 finite element analysis in paragraph 3.5, of the actual door carried out using the model calibrated as per paragraph 3.7, assuming that the differences in the geometry and dimensions between the actual door and the specimen door do not significantly influence the results.


Copyright 2022 Clasifications Register Group Limited, International Maritime Organization, International Labour Organization or Maritime and Coastguard Agency. All rights reserved. Clasifications Register Group Limited, its affiliates and subsidiaries and their respective officers, employees or agents are, individually and collectively, referred to in this clause as 'Clasifications Register'. Clasifications Register assumes no responsibility and shall not be liable to any person for any loss, damage or expense caused by reliance on the information or advice in this document or howsoever provided, unless that person has signed a contract with the relevant Clasifications Register entity for the provision of this information or advice and in that case any responsibility or liability is exclusively on the terms and conditions set out in that contract.