Clasification Society Rulefinder 2020 - Version 9.33 - Fix
Common Structural Rules - Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers, January 2019 - Part 1 General Hull Requirements - Chapter 4 Loads - Section 8 Loading Conditions - 3 Oil Tankers

3 Oil Tankers

3.1 Specific design loading conditions

3.1.1 Seagoing conditions

The following seagoing loading conditions are to be included, as a minimum, in the loading manual:
  • a) Heavy ballast condition where the ballast tanks may be full, partially full or empty. Where ballast tanks are partially full, the conditions in [2.2.1] are to be complied with. The fore peak water ballast tank is to be full, if fitted. If upper and lower fore peak tanks are fitted, the lower is required to be full and the upper tank may be full, partially full or empty. All the cargo tanks are to be empty including cargo tanks suitable for the carriage of water ballast at sea. The draught at the forward perpendicular is not to be less than that for the normal ballast condition. The propeller is to be fully immersed. The trim is to be by the stern and is not to exceed 0.015 LLL.
  • b) Mid-voyage conditions relating to tank cleaning or other operations where these differ significantly from the ballast conditions.
  • c) Any specified non-uniform distribution of loading.
  • d) Conditions with high density cargo including the maximum design cargo density, when applicable.
  • e) Design ballast condition in which all segregated ballast tanks in the cargo tank region are full and all other tanks are empty including fuel oil and fresh water tanks. This design condition is for assessment of hull strength and is not intended for ship operation. This condition will also be covered by the IMO 73/78 SBT condition provided the corresponding condition in the loading manual only includes ballast in segregated ballast tanks in the cargo tank region.

3.1.2 Additional loading conditions

The following additional loading conditions are to be included in the loading manual if the ship is specifically approved and intended to be operated in such conditions:
  • a) Seagoing ballast conditions including water ballast carried in one or more cargo tanks which are intended for use in emergency situations as allowed by MARPOL Reg. 18.
  • b) Seagoing loading conditions where the net static upward load on the double bottom exceeds that given with the combination of an empty cargo tank and a mean ship’s draught of 0.9 TSC.
  • c) Seagoing loading conditions with cargo tanks less than 25% full with the combination of mean ship’s draught greater than 0.9 TSC.
  • d) Seagoing loading conditions where the net static downward load on the double bottom exceeds that given with the combination of a full cargo tank at a cargo density of 1.025 t/m3 or greater and a mean ship’s draught of 0.6 TSC.
  • e) For ships arranged with cross ties in the centre cargo tank, seagoing loading conditions showing a nonsymmetric loading pattern where the difference in filling level between corresponding port and starboard wing cargo tanks exceeds 25% of the filling height in the wing cargo tank.

3.2 Design load combinations for direct strength analysis

3.2.1 The design load combinations for FE analysis are given in Table 1 as follows:

Table 1 : Design load combination for oil tankers

Midship cargo hold region Outside midship cargo hold region Foremost cargo tanks Aftmost cargo tanks
Tankers with two oil-tight bulkheads Table 2 Table 4 Table 6 Table 8
Tankers with one centreline oil-tight bulkhead Table 3 Table 5 Table 7 Table 9
Note 1: Outside midship cargo hold region means the forward or aft cargo hold region except the foremost and aftmost cargo holds

3.2.2 For tankers with two oil-tight longitudinal bulkheads, where the cargo tank length is less than 0.15 L, the draughts given in Table 2, Table 4, Table 6 and Table 8 are subject to special consideration by the Society.

3.2.3 For tankers with one centreline oil-tight longitudinal bulkhead, where the cargo tank length is less than 0.11 L, the draughts given in Table 3, Table 5, Table 7 and Table 9 are subject to special consideration by the Society.

3.2.4 For seagoing conditions, the dynamic load cases required to be investigated for each loading pattern are indicated in Table 2 to Table 9. Dynamic load cases are defined in Ch 4, Sec 2.

3.2.5 Ships with structure symmetrical about centreline

For ships with structure symmetrical about the centreline, the loading pattern mirrored about centreline of another pattern may be omitted provided the results (yield and buckling) are mirrored, e.g. Table 2 A7b, A12b.

3.2.6 Tankers with two oil-tight longitudinal bulkheads except with a cross tie arrangement in the wing cargo tanks

For tankers with two oil-tight longitudinal bulkheads except with a cross tie arrangement in the wing cargo tanks, loading patterns A7 and A12 in Table 2, Table 4, Table 6 and Table 8 are to be examined for the possibility that unequal filling levels in transversely paired wing cargo tanks would result in a more onerous stress response. Loading pattern A7 is required to be analysed only if such a non-symmetric seagoing loading condition is included in the ship loading manual. The actual loading pattern, draught, GM and kr from the loading manual are to be used in the FE analysis. Where the GM and kr are not given in the ship’s loading manual, GM and kr are to be determined in accordance with Ch 4, Sec 3.

If loading patterns A7 and A12 are not considered, an operational restriction describing that the difference in filling level between corresponding port and starboard wing cargo tanks is not to exceed 25% of the filling height in the wing cargo tank, is to be added in the loading manual.

Loading patterns A7 and A12 need not be examined for tankers with a cross tie arrangement in the wing cargo tanks.

3.2.7 For tankers with two oil-tight longitudinal bulkheads, seagoing loading pattern A3 and harbour loading pattern A13, with all cargo tanks abreast empty, in Table 2, Table 4, Table 6 and Table 8 are to be analysed with a ship draught of 0.65 TSC and 0.7 TSC respectively. If conditions in the ship loading manual specify greater draughts for loading pattern A3 or A13, then the maximum specified draught in the ship’s loading manual for the loading pattern is to be used.

3.2.8 For tankers with two oil-tight longitudinal bulkheads, seagoing loading pattern A5 and harbour loading pattern A11, with all cargo tanks abreast fully loaded, in Table 2, Table 4, Table 6 and Table 8 are to be analysed with a ship draught of 0.65 TSC and 0.6 TSC respectively. If conditions in the ship loading manual specify lesser draughts for loading pattern A5 or A11, then the minimum specified draught in the ship’s loading manual for the loading pattern is to be used.

3.2.9 For loading patterns A1, A2, B1, B2 and B3, with cargo tank(s) empty, in Table 2 to Table 9, a minimum ship draught of 0.9 TSC is to be used in the analysis. If conditions in the ship loading manual specify greater draughts for loading patterns with empty cargo tank(s), then the maximum specified draught for the actual condition is to be used.

3.2.10 Ballast conditions

Where a ballast condition is specified in the ship loading manual with ballast water filled in one or more cargo tanks, loading patterns A8 or B7 in Table 2 or Table 3 are to be examined.

If the actual loading pattern as specified in the loading manual is different from load pattern A8 or B7 then:
  • a) The actual loading patterns are to be substituted for the loading pattern A8 or B7 with the following calculation conditions:
  • Draught to be taken as TBAL-E,
  • CBM-LC = 100% (sag.),
  • CSF-LC = 100%,
  • 100% filling of the considered tanks carrying ballast water.
  • b) The strength assessment is to be carried out for all the dynamic load cases as defined in Ch 4, Sec 2.
  • c) An operational restriction corresponding to the analysed condition is to be added in the loading manual.

The actual loading pattern, draught, GM and kr from the loading manual are to be used in the FE analysis. Where the GM and kr are not given in the ship’s loading manual, GM and kr are to be determined in accordance with Ch 4, Sec 3.

Table 2 : Load combinations for FE analysis for two oil-tight bulkheads oil tankers applicable to midship cargo hold region

No. Loading pattern Still water loads Dynamic load cases
Draught CBM-LC : % of perm. SWBM CSF-LC : % of perm. SWSF Midship cargo region
Seagoing conditions
A1 0.9TSC 100% (sagging)

100%

HSM-1 BSP-1P/S N/A
100% (hogging)

100%

HSM-2
FSM-2
BSP-1P/S OST-2P/S
OSA-1P/S
A2 0.9TSC 100% (sagging) 100% HSM-1 BSR-1P/S
BSP-1P/S
N/A
100% (hogging) 100% HSM-2
FSM-2
BSR-1P/S

BSP-1P/S

N/A
A3 0.65TSC 100%
(hogging)
100% (4)
Max SFLC
HSM-2 N/A N/A
100% (5)
Max SFLC
HSM-2 N/A N/A
100% N/A BSP-1P/S N/A
0% 100% (6)
Max SFLC
HSM-1 N/A N/A
100% N/A BSP-1P/S N/A
A4 0.6TSC 100%
(sagging)
100% HSM-1 BSR-1P/S

BSP-1P/S

OSA-2P/S
A5 0.65TSC 100% (sagging) 100% (4)
Max SFLC
HSM-1 N/A N/A

100% (5)

Max SFLC

HSM-1 N/A N/A

100%

N/A BSP-1P/S N/A
0% 100% (6)
Max SFLC
HSM-2 N/A N/A
100% N/A BSP-1P/S N/A
A6 0.6TSC 100%
(hogging)
100% HSM-2 BSR-1P/S
BSP-1P/S
OSA-1P/S
A7a TLC 100%
(hogging)

100%

HSM-2
FSM-2
BSR-1P/S
BSP-1P/S
OST-2P/S
OSA-1P/S
OSA-2P/S
A7b TLC 100%
(hogging)
100% HSM-2
FSM-2
BSR-1P/S
BSP-1P/S
OST-2P/S
OSA-1P/S
OSA-2P/S
A8 TBAL-E 100%
(sagging)
100% HSM-1 BSR-1P/S
BSP-1P/S
OST-2P/S
Harbour and testing conditions
A9 0.25TSC 100%
(sagging)
100% N/A
A10 0.25TSC 100%
(sagging)
100% N/A
A11 0.6TSC 100%
(sagging)
100% (2) Max SFLC N/A
100% (3) Max SFLC N/A
A12a (1) 0.33TSC N/A N/A N/A
A12b (1) 0.33TSC N/A N/A N/A
A13 0.7TSC 100%
(hogging)
100% (2) Max SFLC N/A
100% (3) Max SFLC N/A
A14 TSC 100%
(hogging)
100% N/A
(1) The actual shear force and bending moment that results from the application of local loads to the FE model are to be used. Adjusting vertical loads and bending moments are not applied.
(2) The shear force is to be adjusted to target value at aft bulkhead of the mid-hold.
(3) The shear force is to be adjusted to target value at forward bulkhead of the mid-hold.
(4) For the mid-hold where xb-aft ≤ 0.5L and xb-fwd ≥ 0.5L, the shear force is to be adjusted to target value at aft bulkhead of the midhold.
(5) For the mid-hold where xb-aft ≤ 0.5L and xb-fwd ≥ 0.5L, the shear force is to be adjusted to target value at forward bulkhead of the mid-hold.
(6) This load combination is to be considered only for the mid-hold where xb-aft > 0.5L or xb-fwd < 0.5L.

Table 3 : Load combinations for FE analysis for one centreline oil-tight bulkheads oil tankers applicable to midship cargo region

No. Loading pattern Still water loads Dynamic load cases
Draught CBM-LC : % of perm. SWBM CSF-LC : % of perm. SWSF Midship cargo region
Seagoing conditions
B1 0.9TSC 100%
(sagging)
100% HSM-1
HSA-1
BSP-1P/S N/A
100%
(hogging)
100% HSM-2
FSM-2
BSR-1P
BSP-1P
OST-2P
B2 0.9TSC 100%
(sagging)
100% HSM-1
HSA-1
BSP-1P/S N/A
100%
(hogging)
100% HSM-2FSM-2 BSR-1S
BSP-1S
OST-2S
B3 0.9TSC 100%
(hogging)

100% (3) Max SFLC

HSM-2
FSM-2
N/A N/A
100% (4) Max SFLC HSM-2
FSM-2
N/A N/A
100% N/A BSP-1P/S N/A
0% 100% (5) Max SFLC HSM-1

FSM-1

N/A N/A
B4 0.6TSC 100%
(sagging)
75% HSM-1 BSP-1P OSA-2P/S
B5 0.6TSC 100%
(sagging)
75% HSM-1 BSP-1S OSA-2P/S
B6 0.6TSC 100%
(sagging)

100% (3)Max SFLC

HSM-1 N/A N/A
100% (4)Max SFLC HSM-1 N/A N/A
100% N/A BSP-1P/S N/A
0% 100% (5)Max SFLC HSM-2 N/A N/A
B7 TBAL-E 100%
(sagging)
100% HSM-1 BSP-1P/S N/A
Harbour and testing conditions
B8 0.33TSC 100%
(sagging)
100% (1) Max SFLC N/A
100% (2) Max SFLC N/A
B9 0.33TSC 100%
(sagging)

75%

N/A
B10 0.33TSC 100%
(sagging)
75% N/A
B11 TSC 100% (hogging) 100% (1) Max SFLC N/A
100% (2) Max SFLC N/A
(1) The shear force is to be adjusted to target value at aft bulkhead of the mid-hold.
(2) The shear force is to be adjusted to target value at forward bulkhead of the mid-hold.
(3) For the mid-hold where xb-aft ≤ 0.5L and xb-fwd ≥ 0.5L, the shear force is to be adjusted to target value at aft bulkhead of the midhold.
(4) For the mid-hold where xb-aft ≤ 0.5L and xb-fwd ≥ 0.5L, the shear force is to be adjusted to target value at forward bulkhead of the mid-hold.
(5) This load combination is to be considered only For the mid-hold where xb-aft > 0.5L or xb-fwd < 0.5L.

Table 4 : Load combinations for FE analysis for two oil-tight bulkheads oil tankers applicable to outside midship cargo hold region

No. Loading pattern Still water loads Dynamic load cases
Draught CBM-LC : % of perm. SWBM CSF-LC : % of perm. SWSF Aft region Forward region

Seagoing conditions

A1 0.9TSC 100% (sagging) 100% HSM-1
BSP-1P/S,
HSM-1, BSP-1P/S,
100%
(hogging)
100% HSM-2, FSM-2
BSP-1P/S,
OST-2P/S,
OSA-1P/S,
HSM-2, FSM-2
BSP-1P/S,
A2 0.9TSC 100%
(sagging)
100% HSM-1
BSP-1P/S,
HSM-1, FSM-1
BSP-1P/S,
OSA-2P/S,
100%
(hogging)
100% HSM-2, FSM-2
BSP-1P/S,
HSM-2,
BSP-1P/S,
A3 0.65TSC 100%
(hogging)
100% Max SFLC HSM-2 HSM-2
FSM-2
100% BSP-1P/S, BSP-1P/S,
OSA-2P/S,
0% 100% Max SFLC HSM-1 HSM-1
100% N/A BSP-1P/S,
OSA-2P/S,
A4 0.6TSC 100%
(sagging)
100% HSM-1
BSP-1P/S,
BSR-1P/S,
HSM-1
BSP-1P/S,
BSR-1P/S,
OSA-2P/S,
A5 0.65TSC 100%
(sagging)
100% Max SFLC HSM-1
FSM-1
HSM-1
100% BSP-1P/S, BSP-1P/S,
OSA-2P/S
0% 100% Max SFLC HSM-2 HSM-2
100% BSP-1P/S, BSP-1P/S,
OSA-2P/S
A6 0.6TSC 100%
(hogging)
100% HSM-2
BSP-1P/S,
BSR-1P/S,
HSM-2,
BSP-1P/S,
BSR-1P/S,
OSA-2P/S,
A7a TLC 100%
(hogging)
100% HSM-2, FSM-2
BSP-1P/S,
BSR-1P, BSR-2S
OSA-1P/S,
OSA-2P/S,
OST-2P
HSM-2, FSM-2
BSP-1P/S,
BSR-1P, BSR-2S
OSA-2P/S,
A7b TLC 100%
(hogging)
100% HSM-2, FSM-2
BSP-1P/S,
BSR-2P, BSR-1S
OSA-1P/S,
OSA-2P/S,
OST-2S
HSM-2, FSM-2
BSP-1P/S,
BSR-2P, BSR-1S
OSA-2P/S,
Harbour and testing conditions
A9 0.25TSC 100%
(sagging)
100% N/A
A10 0.25TSC 100%
(sagging)
100% N/A
A11 0.6TSC 100%
(sagging)
100% (2) Max SFLC N/A
100% (3) Max SFLC N/A
A12a (1) 0.33TSC N/A N/A N/A
A12b (1) 0.33TSC N/A N/A N/A
A13 0.7TSC 100% (hogging) 100% (2) Max SFLC N/A
100% (3) Max SFLC N/A
A14 TSC 100% (hogging) 100% N/A
(1) The actual shear force and bending moment that results from the application of local loads to the FE model are to be used. Adjusting vertical loads and bending moments are not applied.
(2) The shear force is to be adjusted to target value at aft bulkhead of the mid-hold.
(3) The shear force is to be adjusted to target value at forward bulkhead of the mid-hold.

Table 5 : Load combinations for FE analysis for one centreline oil-tight bulkheads oil tankers applicable to outside midship cargo hold region

No. Loading pattern Still water loads Dynamic load cases
Draught CBM-LC : % of perm. SWBM CSF-LC : % of perm. SWSF Aft region Forward region
Seagoing conditions
B1 0.9TSC 100%
(sagging)
100% HSM-1, FSM1
BSP-1P/S,
OSA-1S
HSM-1
BSP-1P/S,
OSA-2S
100%
(hogging)
100% HSM-2, FSM-2
BSP-1P/S,
OSA-1P
OST-2P/S,
HSM-2, FSM-2
BSP-1P/S,
OSA-2S
B2 0.9TSC 100%
(sagging)
100% HSM-1, FSM-1
BSP-1P/S,
OSA-1P
HSM-1
BSP-1P/S,
OSA-2P
100%
(hogging)
100% HSM-2, FSM-2
BSP-1P/S,
OSA-1S
OST-2P/S,
HSM-2, FSM-2
BSP-1P/S,
OSA-2P
B3 0.9TSC 100%
(hogging)
100% Max SFLC HSM-2
FSM-2
HSM-2
FSM-2
100% BSP-1P/S,
BSR-1P/S,
BSR-1P/S,
0% 100% Max SFLC HSM-1
FSM-1
HSM-1
FSM-1
100% BSP-1P/S, BSP-1P/S,
B4 0.6TSC 100%
(sagging)
75% HSM-1
BSR-1P/S,
HSM-1
BSP-1P/S,
OSA-2P/S,
B5 0.6TSC 100%
(sagging)
75% HSM-1
BSR-1P/S,
HSM-1
BSP-1P/S,
OSA-2P/S,
B6 0.6TSC 100%
(sagging)
100% Max SFLC HSM-1
FSM-1
HSM-1
FSM-1
100% OST-1P/S, OSA-2P/S,
0% 100% Max SFLC HSM-2
FSM-2
HSM-2
FSM-2
100% OSA-2P/S, OSA-2P/S,
Harbour and testing conditions
B8 0.33TSC 100%
(sagging)
100% (1) Max SFLC N/A
100% (2) Max SFLC N/A
B9 0.33TSC 100%
(sagging)
75% N/A
B10 0.33TSC 100%
(sagging)
75% N/A
B11 TSC 100% (hogging) 100% (1) Max SFLC N/A
100% (2) Max SFLC N/A
(1) The shear force is to be adjusted to target value at aft bulkhead of the mid-hold.
(2) The shear force is to be adjusted to target value at forward bulkhead of the mid-hold.

Table 6 : Load combinations for FE analysis for two oil-tight bulkheads oil tankers applicable for foremost cargo hold

No. Loading pattern Still water loads Dynamic load cases
Draught CBM-LC : % of perm. SWBM CSF-LC : % of perm. SWSF Foremost cargo hold
Seagoing conditions
A1 0.9TSC 100%
(sagging)
100% HSM-1, FSM-1
BSP-1P/S,BSR-1P/S
OSA-2P/S, OST-1P/S
A2 0.9TSC 100%
(sagging)
100% HSM-1,
OSA-2P/S
A3-1 0.65TSC

100%
(sagging)

100%

HSM-1,
OSA-2P/S
A3-2 (1) 0.65TSC 0% 100% Max SFLC HSM-2
100% BSP-1P/S,
OSA-2P/S
100%
(sagging)
100% Max SFLC HSM-1
100% OSA-2P/S
A4 (1) 0.6TSC 50%
(hogging)
100% FSM-1, BSP-1P/S,
OSA-2P/S
A5 0.65TSC 0% 100% Max SFLC HSM-1
100%
(hogging)
100% Max SFLC HSM-2
100% BSP-1P/S
A6 (1) 0.6TSC 50%
(hogging)
100% OSA-2P/S
A7a TLC 100%
(sagging)
100% HSM-1, HSA-1, FSM-1,
BSP-1P/S, BSR-1P/S
OST-1P/S,
OSA-2P/S
A7b TLC 100%
(sagging)
100% HSM-1, HSA-1, FSM-1,
BSP-1P/S, BSR-1P/S
OST-1P/S,
OSA-2P/S
Harbourand testing conditions
A9 0.25TSC 100%
(hogging)
100% N/A
A10 0.25TSC 100%
(hogging)
100% N/A
A11 0.6TSC 100%
(hogging)
100% (2) Max SFLC N/A
100% (3) Max SFLC N/A
A12-a (1) (4) 0.33TSC N/A N/A N/A
A12-b (1) (4) 0.33TSC N/A N/A N/A
A13 (1) 0.7TSC 100%
(sagging)
100% (2) Max SFLC N/A
100% (3) Max SFLC N/A
A14 TSC 100%
(sagging)
100% N/A
(1) 100% filling of all fore peak water ballast tanks.
(2) The shear force is to be adjusted to target value at aft bulkhead of the mid-hold.
(3) The shear force is to be adjusted to target value at forward bulkhead of the mid-hold.
(4) The actual shear force and bending moment that results from the application of local loads to the FE model are to be used. Adjusting vertical loads and bending moments are not applied.

Table 7 : Load combination for FE analysis for one centreline oil-tight bulkheads oil tankers applicable for foremost cargo hold

No. Loading pattern Still water loads Dynamic load cases
Draught CBM-LC : % of perm. SWBM CSF-LC : % of perm. SWSF Foremost cargo hold
Seagoing conditions
B1 0.9TSC 100%
(sagging)
100% HSM-1
BSP-1P/S
OSA-2P/S
B2 0.9TSC 100%
(sagging)
100% HSM-1
BSP-1P/S
OSA-2P/S
B3-1 0.9TSC 100%
(sagging)

100%

BSP-1S/P, OSA-2S/P,
HSM-1
B3-2 (1) 0.9TSC 0% 100% Max SFLC HSM-2,
100% BSP-1S/P,
OSA-2S/P,
100%
(sagging)
100% Max SFLC HSM-1, FMS-1
100% BSP-1S/P, OST-1S/P,
OSA-2P/S
B4 (1) 0.6TSC 100%
(hogging)
75% BSP-1P/S, OSA-2P/S
B5 (1) 0.6TSC 100%
(hogging)
75% BSP-1P/S, OSA-2P/S
B6 0.6TSC 0% 100% Max SFLC HSM-1
100% OSA-2P/S
100%
(hogging)
100% Max SFLC HSM-2, FSM-2,
100% OSA-2P/S
Harbour and testing conditions
B8 0.33TSC 100% (hogging) 100% (2) Max SFLC N/A
100% (3) Max SFLC N/A
B9 (1) 0.33TSC 100% (hogging) 75% N/A
B10 (1) 0.33TSC 100% (hogging) 75% N/A
B11-1 TSC 100% (sagging) 100% N/A
B11-2 (1) TSC 100% (sagging) 100% (2) Max SFLC N/A
100% (3) Max SFLC N/A
(1) 100% filling of all fore end water ballast tanks.
(2) The shear force is to be adjusted to target value at aft bulkhead of the mid-hold.
(3) The shear force is to be adjusted to target value at forward bulkhead of the mid-hold.

Table 8 : Load combinations for FE analysis for two oil-tight bulkheads oil tankers applicable for aftmost cargo hold

No. Loading pattern Still water loads Dynamic load cases
Draught CBM-LC : % of perm. SWBM CSF-LC : % of perm. SWSF Aftmost cargo hold
Seagoing conditions
A1 0.9TSC 100% (sagging) 100% FSM-1, HSM-1,
BSP-1P/S
100% (hogging) 100% HSM-2,
BSP-1P/S, BSR-1P/S
OSA-1P/S
A2 0.9TSC 100%
(sagging)
100% HSM-1, FSM-1
BSR-1P/S,
OST-1P/S
100%
(hogging)

100%

HSM-2, FSM-1, FSM-2,
OSA-1P/S
A3-1 (1) (2) 0.65TSC 100%
(hogging)
100% Max SFLC HSM-2
FSM-2
100%
(sagging)
100% Max SFLC HSM-1, FSM-1
100% BSP-1P/S
A3-2 (1) (3) 0.65TSC 100%
(hogging)
100% Max SFLC HSM-2
100% BSP-1P/S, OSA-1P/S
100%
(sagging)
100% Max SFLC HSM-1,FSM-1
100% BSP-1P/S, OST-1P/S

A4

0.6TSC 100%
(sagging)
100% HSM-1,
BSP-1P/S
100%
(hogging)
100% HSM-2, FSM-1,
BSP-1P/S,
OSA-1P/S, OSA-2P/S

A5-1 (2)

0.65TSC 0% 100% Max SFLC HSM-1, HSM-2, FSM-1,

100%
(hogging)

100% Max SFLC HSM-2, FSM-1
100% BSP-1P/S

A5-2 (3)

0.65TSC 0% 100% Max SFLC HSM-1, HSM-2
100% BSP-1P/S, BSR-1P/S
100%
(hogging)
100% Max SFLC HSM-2, FSM-2
A6 0.6TSC 100%
(hogging)
100% HSM-2, FSM-1,
BSP-1P/S, BSR-1P/S,
OSA-1P/S
A7a TLC 100% (hogging) 100% HSM-2, FSM-1,
BSP-1P/S, BSR-1P/S,
OSA-1P/S
A7b TLC 100% (hogging) 100% HSM-2, FSM-1,
BSP- 1P/S, BSR-1P/S,
OSA-1P/S
Harbour and testing conditions
A9 0.25TSC 100% (hogging) 100% N/A
A10 0.25TSC 100% (hogging) 100% N/A
A11-1 (2) 0.6TSC 100% (hogging) 100% (5) Max SFLC N/A
A11-2 (3) 0.6TSC 100% (hogging) 100% (5) Max SFLC N/A
100% (6) Max SFLC N/A
A12a (4) 0.33TSC N/A N/A N/A
A12b (4) 0.33TSC N/A N/A N/A
A13-1 (1) (2) 0.7TSC 100% (hogging) 100% (5) Max SFLC N/A
A13-2 (1) (3) 0.7TSC 100% (hogging) 100% (5) Max SFLC N/A
100% (6) Max SFLC N/A
100% (sagging) 100% (5) Max SFLC N/A
100% (6) Max SFLC N/A
A14 TSC 100% (hogging) 100% N/A
100% (sagging) 100% N/A
(1) 100% filling of fuel and water ballast tanks in engine room, with tank boundaries at the forward engine room bulkhead.
(2) The required adjustment in shear force at aft bulkhead of the considered hold is to be done at forward slop tank bulkhead.
(3) The required adjustment in shear force at aft bulkhead of the considered hold is to be done at forward machinery space bulkhead.
(4) The actual shear force and bending moment that results from the application of local loads to the FE model are to be used. Adjusting vertical loads and bending moments are not applied.
(5) The shear force is to be adjusted to target value at aft bulkhead of the mid-hold.
(6) The shear force is to be adjusted to target value at forward bulkhead of the mid-hold.

Table 9 : Load combination for FE analysis for one centreline oil-tight bulkheads oil tankers applicable for the aftmost cargo hold

No. Loading pattern Still water loads Dynamic load cases
Draught CBM-LC : % of perm. SWBM CSF-LC : % of perm. SWSF Aftmost cargo hold
Seagoing conditions
B1 0.9TSC 100%
(sagging)
100% HSM-1, FSM-1
BSP-1P/S, BSR-1P/S
100%
(hogging)
100% HSM-2
BSP-1P/S,OSA-1P/S
B2 0.9TSC 100%
(sagging)
100% HSM-1, FSM-1
BSP-1P/S, BSR-1P/S
100%
(hogging)
100% HSM-2
BSP-1P/S, OSA-1P/S
B3-1 (1) (2) 0.9TTC 100%
(hogging)
100% Max SFLC HSM-2
100% BSP-1P/S
100%
(sagging)
100% Max SFLC HSM-1
FSM-1
100% BSP-1P/S
B3-2 (1) (3) 0.9TTC 100%
(hogging)
100% Max SFLC HSM-2, FSM-2
100% BSP-1P/S,
OSA-1P/S
100%
(sagging)
100% Max SFLC HSM-1
FSM-1
100% BSP-1P/S
B4 0.6TSC 100%
(hogging)
75% HSM-2,
BSP-1P/S,
OSA-1P/S
B5 0.6TSC 100%
(hogging)

75%

HSM-2,
BSP-1P/S,
OSA-1P/S
B6-1 (2) 0.6TSC 0% 100% Max SFLC HSM-1
100%
(hogging)
100% Max SFLC HSM-2
B6-2 (3) 0.6TSC 0% 100% Max SFLC HSM-1
100%
(hogging)
100% Max SFLC HSM-2
100% HSA-2,
BSR-1P/S,
Harbour and testing conditions
B8-1 (2) 0.33TSC 100%
(hogging)
100% (4) Max SFLC N/A
B8-2 (3) 0.33TSC 100%
(hogging)
100% (4) Max SFLC N/A
100% (5) Max SFLC N/A
100%
(sagging)
100% (4) Max SFLC N/A
100% (5) Max SFLC N/A
B9 0.33TSC 100%
(hogging)
75% N/A
B10 0.33TSC 100%
(hogging)
75% N/A
B11-1 (1) (2) TSC 100%
(hogging)
100% (4) Max SFLC N/A
100%
(sagging)
100% (4) Max SFLC N/A
B11-2 (1) (3) TSC 100%
(hogging)
100% (4) Max SFLC N/A
100% (5) Max SFLC N/A
100%
(sagging)
100% (4) Max SFLC N/A
100% (5) Max SFLC N/A
(1) 100% filling of fuel and water ballast tanks in engine room, with tank boundaries at the forward engine room bulkhead.
(2) The required adjustment in shear force at aft bulkhead of the considered hold is to be done at forward slop tank bulkhead.
(3) The required adjustment in shear force at aft bulkhead of the considered hold is to be done at forward machinery space bulkhead.
(4) The shear force is to be adjusted to target value at aft bulkhead of the mid-hold.
(5) The shear force is to be adjusted to target value at forward bulkhead of the mid-hold.

Copyright 2020 Clasification Society, International Maritime Organization, International Labour Organization or Maritime and Coastguard Agency. All rights reserved. Clasification Society, its affiliates and subsidiaries and their respective officers, employees or agents are, individually and collectively, referred to in this clause as 'Clasification Society'. Clasification Society Register assumes no responsibility and shall not be liable to any person for any loss, damage or expense caused by reliance on the information or advice in this document or howsoever provided, unless that person has signed a contract with the relevant Clasification Society entity for the provision of this information or advice and in that case any responsibility or liability is exclusively on the terms and conditions set out in that contract.