General
1 Initial condition – an intact loading condition to be considered in the damage analysis
described by the mean draught, vertical centre of gravity and the trim; or alternative
parameters from where the same may be determined (e.g. displacement, GM and
trim). There are three initial conditions corresponding to the three draughts
ds, dp and dl.
2 Immersion limits – immersion limits are an array of points that are not to be immersed
at various stages of flooding as indicated in regulations 7-2.5.2 and 7-2.5.3.
3 Openings – all openings need to be defined: both weathertight and unprotected. Openings
are the most critical factor to preventing an inaccurate index A. If the final
waterline immerses the lower edge of any opening through which progressive flooding
takes place, the factor "s" may be recalculated taking such flooding into
account. However, in this case the s value should also be calculated without
taking into account progressive flooding and corresponding opening. The smallest
s value should be retained for the contribution to the attained index.
Regulation 7-2.1
1 In cases where the GZ curve may include more than one "range" of positive
righting levers for a specific stage of flooding, only one continuous positive "range"
of the GZ curve may be used within the allowable range/heel limits for
calculation purposes. Different stages of flooding may not be combined in a single
GZ curve.

2 In figure 1, the s-factor may be calculated from the heel angle, range and
corresponding GZmax of the first or second "range" of positive
righting levers. In figure 2, only one s-factor can be calculated.
Regulation 7-2.2
Intermediate stages of flooding
1 The case of instantaneous flooding in unrestricted spaces in way of the damage zone
does not require intermediate stage flooding calculations. Where intermediate stages of
flooding calculations are necessary in connection with progressive flooding, flooding
through non-watertight boundaries or cross-flooding, they should reflect the sequence of
filling as well as filling level phases. Calculations for intermediate stages of
flooding should be performed whenever equalization is not instantaneous, i.e.
equalization is of a duration greater than 60 s. Such calculations consider the progress
through one or more floodable (non-watertight) spaces, or cross-flooded spaces.
Bulkheads surrounding refrigerated spaces, incinerator rooms and longitudinal bulkheads
fitted with non-watertight doors are typical examples of structures that may
significantly slow down the equalization of main compartments.
Flooding boundaries
2 If a compartment contains decks, inner bulkheads, structural elements and doors of
sufficient tightness and strength to seriously restrict the flow of water, for
intermediate stage flooding calculation purposes it should be divided into corresponding
non-watertight spaces. It is assumed that the non-watertight divisions considered in the
calculations are limited to "A" class fire-rated bulkheads and decks, and do not apply
to "B" class fire-rated bulkheads normally used in accommodation areas (e.g. cabins and
corridors). This guidance also relates to regulation 4.5. For spaces in the double
bottom, in general, only main longitudinal structures with a limited number of openings
have to be considered as flooding boundaries.
Sequential flooding computation
3 For each damage scenario, the damage extent and location determine the
initial stage of flooding. Calculations should be performed in stages, each stage
comprising at least two intermediate filling phases in addition to the full phase per
flooded space. Unrestricted spaces in way of damage should be considered as flooded
immediately. Every subsequent stage involves all connected spaces being flooded
simultaneously until an impermeable boundary or final equilibrium is reached. Unless the
flooding process is simulated using time-domain methods, when a flooding stage leads to
both a self-acting cross-flooding device and a non-watertight boundary, the self-acting
cross-flooding device is assumed to act immediately and occur before the non-watertight
boundary is breached. If due to the configuration of the subdivision in the ship it is
expected that other intermediate stages of flooding are more onerous, then those should
be investigated.
3.1 For each phase of a flooding stage (except the final full phase), the instantaneous
transverse moment of this floodwater is calculated by assuming a constant volume of
water at each heeling angle. The GZ curve is calculated with a constant intact
displacement at all stages of flooding. Only one free surface needs to be assumed for
water in spaces flooded during the current stage.
3.1.1 In the final full phase of each stage, the water level in rooms
flooded during this stage reaches the outside sea level, so the lost buoyancy method can
be used. The same method applies for every successive stage (added volume of water with
a constant intact displacement for all phases before the final full phase of the stage
in consideration), while each of the previous stages at the final full phase can be
calculated with the lost buoyancy method.
3.1.2 The examples below present a simplified, sequential approach to
intermediate stage downflooding and cross-flooding. Because simultaneous downflooding
and cross-flooding is not accounted for, any time-to-flood calculated with this
sequential approach should be conservative. Alternative approaches, such as time-domain
flooding simulation, are also acceptable.
Example 1: Major damage with cross-flooding device
Stage 0: Unrestricted spaces in way of damage should be considered as flooded
immediately (intermediate phases are not considered). The lost buoyancy method is
applied as this is a full (final) phase. Provided the ship does not capsize and remains
at a floating position from which cross-flooding can proceed, stage 0 need not be taken
into account for the sfactor calculation as the first intermediate
stage to be calculated is after 60 s. See cross-flooding/equalization explanatory note 5
below.
|
Stage 1:
Cross-flooding of opposite room
|
|
|
An intermediate
phase
|
|
|
|
Full (final)
phase of flooding stage 1
|
Example 2: Minor damage with downflooding and cross-flooding
Stage 0: Unrestricted spaces in way of damage should be considered as
flooded immediately (intermediate phases are not considered). The lost buoyancy method
is applied as this is a full (final) phase. Provided the ship does not capsize and
remains at a floating position from which cross-flooding can proceed, stage 0 need not
be taken into account for the sfactor calculation as the first
intermediate stage to be calculated is after 60 s. See cross-flooding/equalization
explanatory note 5 below.
|
|
An intermediate phase
|
|
|
|
Full (final) phase of stage
2
|
Cross-flooding/equalization
4 In general, cross-flooding is flooding of an undamaged space of the ship to reduce the
heel in the final equilibrium condition.
5 The cross-flooding time should be calculated in accordance with the
Revised recommendation on a standard method for evaluating cross-flooding
arrangements (resolution MSC.362(92)). If complete fluid equalization occurs in
60 s or less, it should be treated as instantaneous and no further calculations need to
be carried out. Additionally, in cases where sfinal = 1 is achieved in
60 s or less, but equalization is not complete, instantaneous flooding may also be
assumed if sfinal will not become reduced. In any cases where complete
fluid equalization exceeds 60 s, the value of sintermediate after 60 s
is the first intermediate stage to be considered. Only self-acting open cross-flooding
arrangements without valves should be considered effective for instantaneous flooding
cases.
6 Provided that the ship has a GZ greater than 0 and remains in a
position from which cross-flooding can proceed, stage 0 need not be taken into account
for the sfactor calculation as the first intermediate stage to be
calculated is after 60 s.
7 Only cross-flooding devices which are sufficiently submerged below the external
waterline at stage 0 are to be used in the calculation for cross-flooding according to
resolution MSC.362(92).
8 If complete fluid equalization can be finalized in 10 min or less, the
assessment of survivability is carried out using the formula in regulation 7-2.1.1 (i.e.
as the smallest value of sintermediate or sfinal ·
smom)
9 In case the equalization time is longer than 10 min,
sfinal is calculated for the floating position achieved after 10
min of equalization. This floating position is computed by calculating the amount of
flood water according to resolution MSC.362(92) using interpolation, where the
equalization time is set to 10 min, i.e. the interpolation of the flood water volume is
made between the case before equalization (T=0) and the total calculated
equalization time. For damage cases involving different cross-flooding devices serving
different spaces, when the interpolation between the case before equalization
(T=0) and the total calculated equalization time is needed for flood
water volume calculation after 60 s or 10 min, the total equalization time is to be
calculated separately for each cross-flooding device.
10 In any cases where complete fluid equalization exceeds 10 min, the value
of sfinal used in the formula in regulation 7-2.1.1 should be the
minimum of sfinal at 10 min or at final equalization.
11 The factor sintermediate,i may be used for
cross-flooding stages if they are intermediate stages which are followed by other
subsequent flooding stages (e.g. the flooding stages of non-watertight
compartments).
Alternatives
12 As an alternative to the procedure described above in the explanatory notes for
regulation 7-2.2, direct calculation using computational fluid dynamics (CFD),
time-domain flooding simulations or model testing may be used to analyse intermediate
stages of flooding and determine the time for equalization.
Regulation 7-2.3
1 The formulation of sfinal,i is based on target values
for GZ and Range to achieve s = 1. These values are defined as
TGZmax and TRange.
2 If ro-ro spaces are damaged there might be the possibility of water
accumulation on these deck spaces. To account for this, in any damage case where the
ro-ro space is damaged the higher values for TGZmax and TRange
are to be applied for the calculation of si.
Regulation 7-2.4.1.2
The parameter A (projected lateral area) used in this paragraph does not refer to
the attained subdivision index.
Regulation 7-2.5.2.1 and 7-2.5.2.3
Unprotected openings
1 The flooding angle will be limited by immersion of such an opening. It is not necessary
to define a criterion for non-immersion of unprotected openings at equilibrium, because
if it is immersed, the range of positive GZ limited to flooding angle will be
zero so "s" will be equal to zero.
2 An unprotected opening connects two rooms or one room and the outside. An unprotected
opening will not be taken into account if the two connected rooms are flooded or none of
these rooms are flooded. If the opening is connected to the outside, it will not be
taken into account if the connected compartment is flooded. An unprotected opening does
not need to be taken into account if it connects a flooded room or the outside to an
undamaged room, if this room will be considered as flooded in a subsequent stage.
Openings fitted with a weathertight means of closing ("weathertight
openings")
Applies to passenger ships for which the building contract is placed on or after 1
January 2020 and which are constructed before 1 January 2024, and to cargo
ships.
3 The survival "s" factor will be "0" if any such point is submerged
at a stage which is considered as "final". Such points may be submerged during a stage
or phase which is considered as "intermediate", or within the range beyond
equilibrium.
4 If an opening fitted with a weathertight means of closure is submerged at equilibrium
during a stage considered as intermediate, it should be demonstrated that this
weathertight means of closure can sustain the corresponding head of water and that the
leakage rate is negligible.
5 These points are also defined as connecting two rooms or one room and the outside, and
the same principle as for unprotected openings is applied to take them into account or
not. If several stages have to be considered as "final", a "weathertight opening" does
not need to be taken into account if it connects a flooded room or the outside to an
undamaged room if this room will be considered as flooded in a successive "final"
stage.
Regulation 7-2.5.2.2
1 Partial immersion of the bulkhead deck may be accepted at final
equilibrium. This provision is intended to ensure that evacuation along the bulkhead
deck to the vertical escapes will not be impeded by water on that deck. A "horizontal
evacuation route" in the context of this regulation means a route on the bulkhead deck
connecting spaces located on and under this deck with the vertical escapes from the
bulkhead deck required for compliance with SOLAS
chapter II-2.
2 Horizontal evacuation routes on the bulkhead deck include only escape
routes (designated as category 2 stairway spaces according to SOLAS regulation II-2/9.2.2.3 or as category 4 stairway spaces
according to SOLAS regulation II-2/9.2.2.4 for passenger ships carrying not
more than 36 passengers) used for the evacuation of undamaged spaces. Horizontal
evacuation routes do not include corridors (designated as category 3 corridor spaces
according to SOLAS regulation II-2/9.2.2.3 or as category 2 corridor spaces
according to SOLAS regulation II-2/9.2.2.4 for passenger ships carrying not
more than 36 passengers) or escape routes within a damaged zone. No part of a horizontal
evacuation route serving undamaged spaces should be immersed.
3 si = 0 where it is not possible to access a stair leading up to the
embarkation deck from an undamaged space as a result of flooding to the "stairway" or
"horizontal stairway" on the bulkhead deck.
Regulation 7-2.5.3.1
1 The purpose of this paragraph is to provide an incentive to ensure that evacuation
through a vertical escape will not be obstructed by water from above. The paragraph is
intended for smaller emergency escapes, typically hatches, where fitting of a watertight
or weathertight means of closure would otherwise exclude them from being considered as
flooding points.
2 Since the probabilistic regulations do not require that the watertight bulkheads be
carried continuously up to the bulkhead deck, care should be taken to ensure that
evacuation from intact spaces through flooded spaces below the bulkhead deck will remain
possible, for instance by means of a watertight trunk.

Regulation 7-2.6
The sketches in the figure illustrate the connection between position of watertight decks
in the reserve buoyancy area and the use of factor v for damages below these
decks.
|
In example 1, there are 3
horizontal subdivisions (H1, H2
and H3) to be taken into account as the vertical
extent of damage.
|
|
The example shows the maximum
possible vertical extent of damage d + 12.5 m is positioned
between H2 and H3.
H1 with factor v1,
H2 with factor v2 >
v1 but v2 < 1 and
H3 with factor v3 =
1.
|
Example 1: vertical extent of
damage above the waterline
|
|
|
|
|
In example 2,
the factors v1 and v2 are the
same as above. The reserve buoyancy above H3
should be taken undamaged in all damage cases.
|
Example 2: vertical extent of
damage above the waterline
|
|
|
In example 3, the combination
of damages into the rooms R1, R2
and R3 positioned below the initial water line
should be chosen so that the damage with the lowest s-factor
is taken into account. That often results in the definition of
alternative damages to be calculated and compared within a damage
zone taking into account the vertical and the transverse extent. If
the deck taken as the lower limit of damage is not watertight, down
flooding should be considered.
|
Example 3: vertical extent of
damage below the waterline
|
|
Regulation 7-2.6.1
The parameters x1 and x2 are the same as
parameters x1 and x2 used in regulation 7-1.