2.1 A process for evaluating the information collected
could include annual reviews of the implementation of the Guidelines
by the Sub-Committee with a more comprehensive review undertaken after
the Guidelines have been in place for five years. The first review
of available information could occur in a meeting of the Sub-Committee
in early 2014 with a more comprehensive review at a meeting of the
Sub-Committee in early 2017. It may also be useful to take stock of
available information at year three (2015) to determine whether sufficient
information is likely to be available to undertake a more comprehensive
review after five years. If it is determined that further information
is likely to be required, the Sub-Committee could actively encourage
collection of the necessary information. The proposed process is further
detailed in the appendix.
The focus of the review is likely to change over time. Initially
the information available is likely to be on the level of dissemination
and awareness of the Guidelines: whether there are any impediments
(including omissions and errors) to the implementation of the Guidelines
that need to be addressed and evidence of early implementation, e.g.
use of biofouling management plans and record books or in-water inspection.
In subsequent reviews, the focus could shift more towards evaluating
the extent and level of implementation and evidence of change in the
extent of biofouling on ships. New research and/or technology developments
related to the Guidelines would be relevant for all reviews. If, as
a result of the review, modifications to the Guidelines are considered
necessary, the Sub-Committee could recommend these to the MEPC.
2.2 The comprehensive review of all available
information at year five could help determine whether the Guidelines
are having sufficient impact on biofouling management using the performance
measures outlined in this guidance. If the Guidelines are determined
to have sufficient impact, they could continue to be implemented in
their current form with the Sub-Committee determining the nature and
regularity of ongoing reviews. If the Guidelines, or elements of the
Guidelines, are determined to have insufficient impact the Sub-Committee
could provide advice to MEPC on whether other actions may need to
be taken to enhance the effectiveness of the Guidelines in preventing
the transfer of invasive aquatic species.