Method 1
Clasification Society 2024 - Version 9.40
Statutory Documents - IMO Publications and Documents - Resolutions - Marine Environment Protection Committee - Resolution MEPC.356(78) - 2022 Guidelines for Brief Sampling of Anti-Fouling Systems on Ships - (adopted on 10 June 2022) - Annex - 2022 Guidelines for Brief Sampling of Anti-Fouling Systems on Ships - Appendix - Possible methods for brief sampling and analysis of anti-fouling systems on ships - organotin and/or cybutryne - Method 1

Method 1

1 Purpose of this method concerning brief sampling and analysis of anti-fouling systems

1.1 This method has been developed in order to describe a rapid methodology appropriate for the identification of anti-fouling systems on ship hulls containing organotin compounds and/or cybutryne acting as biocide. This method has been designed such that sealers should not be affected, and any underlying anti-fouling agent (or primer) is not taken up in the sampling procedure. The method is not recommended for silicon-based anti-fouling systems.

1.2 The method for organotin compounds (Case A under paragraph 4.6 of the Guidelines) is based on a two-step analysis. The first step detects total tin as an indicator for organotin; the second step, detecting specific organotin compounds, is only necessary in the case of the first step proving positive.

1.3 The method for cybutryne (Case B under paragraph 4.6 of the Guidelines) is based on a one-step analysis.

1.4 The simplified approach (Case C under paragraph 4.6 of the Guidelines) to detect organotin compounds and cybutryne is based on a one-step analysis.

2 Sampling device and materials

2.1 The sampling device is constructed in a way that only the upper layer of paint is removed, thereby it should leave any underlying paint (sealer, primer, etc.) intact. This result is achieved through the use of a moving disk (eccentric rotation), which is covered by an abrasive material like quartz or glass fibre fabric. This abrasive material has to be suitable for its use as a supporting material for the removed paint.

2.2 The device fulfils the following requirements:

  • .1 the device has to work independently from any stationary power supply. The device may be driven by an electrical motor (battery-driven) or may be mechanically driven by a clockwork-like spring, provided it is able to sustain the movement over the required time period;

  • .2 the applied force has to be constant during the operation, and the area for paint removal has to be defined;

  • .3 the abrasive material has to be inert against chemical solvents and acids and must not contain more than trace amounts of tin or tin compounds and/or cybutryne; and

  • .4 the amount of paint removed after a regular operation of the device has to be shown to exceed 20 mg per sample.

2.3 The device as described in the following section has been shown to be suitable for the brief sampling procedure. Any other device may be used however, provided such a device has proven to meet all the above-mentioned requirements.

2.4 The sampling device described here consists of a polyethylene disk, on which fibre glass fabric can be mounted by the use of an O-ring. The disk is moved on an eccentrically rotating axis.

3 Sampling procedure

3.1 The sampling procedure should be performed in the following manner:

  • .1 control samples should be taken through the entire sampling and analytical process to account for possible contamination;

  • .2 the mass of the fibreglass pads is weighed with a precision of at least 1 mg. The weight should be documented for each sample;

  • .3 the fabric should be moistened thoroughly with isopropanol (0.7 mL per sample) immediately before sampling;

  • .4 when a sample point on the hull has been selected, any fouling present should be removed with water and a soft sponge/cloth before taking a specimen of the anti-fouling system (to avoid contamination of the sample). Where possible, if carried out in dry dock, sampling should be carried out after the hull has been water-washed;

  • .5 the sampling device is then held against the surface to be sampled for a period of five seconds, prior to the sampling device being switched on;

  • .6 the sampling device is switched on, thereby removing paint by the circular motion of the fibre glass fabric against the surface of the ship;

  • .7 the sampling device should be applied to the surface of the hull for a suitable period of time, such that at least 20 mg of paint is taken up by the pad. As a general rule, if the pad colour after sampling matches the colour of the hull coating a sufficient sample has been taken;

  • .8 the specimens should be taken as close to each other as possible, but without overlap;

  • .9 upon completion of the sampling, the fibreglass fabric pads should be left to dry and re-weighed;

  • .10 the number of samples will differ depending on the substances targeted as listed in Annex 1 of the AFS Convention.

  • Case A. Analysis of organotin only, every sample should be taken in triplicate.

    • Specimen 'A' – for Step 1

      Specimen 'B' – for Step 2

      Specimen 'X' – for storage/back-up

  • Case B. Analysis of cybutryne only, every sample should be taken in duplicate.

    • Specimen 'C' – for a one-step analysis

      Specimen 'X' – for storage/back-up

  • Case C. Simplified approach to detect organotin and cybutryne, every sample should be taken in duplicate.

    • Specimen 'C' – for a one-step analysis

      Specimen 'X' – for storage/back-up

3.2 Samples should be stored in appropriate sealed packaging which will not react with or contaminate the sample.

Diagram A: Schematic cross section of the sampling device

The indicated points A and B are to be pressed against the surface. The polyethylene disk, covered with the glass fibre fabric, is moved with an amplitude of 2 r (r = 1.0 cm) on the surface.

  Specific data:    
  Force applied on the paint surface:   25 N (Newton)
  Effective diameter of the disk:   5 cm
  Frequency of rotation:   6 rotations/s
  Solvent used:   isopropanol (0.8 mL per sample).

4 Sampling strategy

4.1 Sampling should be conducted in accordance with paragraph 4 of the Guidelines.

4.2 For inspection purposes in most cases accessibility to all parts of the hull will not be given. A minimum number of eight independent samples should be taken from different accessible parts of the hull.

5 Analytical procedure

5.1 The analytical procedure will differ depending on the substances targeted as listed in Annex 1 of the AFS Convention.

Case A. Analysis of organotin only

5.2 The two components comprising the analytical procedure are illustrated in the flow diagram B. The two components, or steps, are as follows:

  • .1 (Step 1) - An analysis of Specimen 'A' for the presence of total tin; and

  • .2 (Step 2) - A more cost- and time-consuming analysis of Specimen 'B', that is applied only when Step 1 produces positive results. This test involves organotin analysis by gas chromatography/mass spectrophotometry (GC/MS) after derivatization and provides specific data on the respective organotin species.

Step 1: Investigation of total tin content in Specimen 'A'

Analysis of Specimen 'A'

5.3 Specimen 'A' is analysed for mass of total tin per kilogram of dry paint (or mass of tin per sample) by applying inductively coupled plasma/mass spectrometry (ICP/MS), once the material had been solubilized by digestion using aqua regia. It should be noted that any other scientifically recognized procedure for tin analysis (such as AAS, XRF and ICP-OES) is acceptable.

Step 2: Characterization of organotin in Specimen 'B'

Analysis of Specimen 'B'

5.4 Should Specimen 'A' produce positive results, organotin compounds should be identified and quantified in Specimen 'B'. Specimen 'B' may be analysed using the following procedure:

  • .1 solvent extraction of Specimen 'B' as supported by sonication in an ultrasonic bath;

  • .2 derivatization with ethylmagnesium bromide;

  • .3 clean-up of the extract;

  • .4 analysis using high resolution gas chromatography/mass spectrophotometry (GC/MS); and

  • .5 quantifications using tripropyltin as a standard.

5.5 Any equally reliable method for the chemical identification and quantification of organotin compounds is acceptable.

Case B. Analysis of cybutryne only

5.6 A one-step analysis of 'Specimen C' for determining the amount of cybutryne, using gas chromatography/mass spectrophotometry (GC/MS).

One-step analysis: Characterization of cybutryne in Specimen 'C'

Analysis of Specimen 'C'

5.7 Specimen 'C' should be analysed using the following procedure:

  • .1 sample extraction using ethyl acetate with added internal standard (ametryn) using an ultrasonic bath for 15 minutes;

  • .2 ventrifugation of the samples at 600 rcf for 5 minutes;

  • .3 analysis of the supernatant using high resolution capillary GC/MS, with the MS operating in SIM mode;

  • .4 quantification using reference cybutryne solutions and an internal standard normalization procedure; and

  • .5 modified GC/MS methods resulting in an expanded measurement uncertainty (k=2; 95% confidence) of 25% are acceptable.

5.8 Other methods for the chemical identification and quantification of cybutryne, if proven equally reliable, could be accepted by the Administration or the port State.

Case C. simplified approach to detect organotin and cybutryne

5.9 A one-step analysis of Specimen 'C' for determining the amount of organotin and cybutryne using gas chromatography/mass spectrophotometry (GC/MS).

One-step analysis: Characterization of organotin and cybutryne in Specimen 'C'

  • .1 sample extraction using toluene with added internal standard (ametryn) using an ultrasonic bath for 15 minutes;

  • .2 derivatization with ethylmagnesium bromide;

  • .3 clean-up of the extract;

  • .4 centrifugation of the samples at 600 rcf for 5 minutes;

  • .5 analysis of the supernatant using high resolution capillary GC/MS, with the MS operating in SIM mode;

  • .6 cybutryne quantification using reference cybutryne solutions and an internal standard normalization procedure. Organotin quantification using tripropyltin as the internal standard; and

  • .7 modified GC/MS methods resulting in an expanded measurement uncertainty (k=2; 95% confidence) of 25% are acceptable.

5.10 Other methods for the chemical identification and quantification of organotin and cybutryne, if proven equally reliable, could be accepted by the Administration or the port State.

6 Threshold and tolerance range

6.1 The threshold value for organotin compounds for the brief sampling method as described here is:

  • "2,500 mg tin (Sn) per kg of dry paint."

6.2 The threshold value for cybutryne for the brief sampling method as described here is:

  • ʺ1,000 mg of cybutryne per kg of dry paint.ʺ

Tolerance range

6.3 The tolerance range is 500 mg Sn / kg of dry paint (20%) in addition to the threshold value.

6.4 The tolerance range is 250 mg cybutryne / kg of dry paint (25%) in addition to the threshold value.

Organotin-containing compounds acting as biocides or catalysts

6.5 As stated in appendix I of resolution MEPC.358(78), for the purposes of defining compliance with Annex 1 to the Convention, it should be noted that small quantities of organotin compounds, acting as chemical catalysts (such as mono- and di-substituted organotin compounds), are allowed, provided they are not acting as a biocide.

6.6 Inorganic impurities in the constituents of the paints should be considered.

6.7 At present neither organotin catalysts nor inorganic impurities are found at concentrations which will be close to the threshold level (2,500 mg Sn/kg of dry paint) or higher. However, organotin-containing compounds, when present in paint in order to act as a biocide, were found in concentrations up to 50,000 mg Sn/kg of dry paint. Thus, the discrimination between anti-fouling systems containing organotin compounds acting as a biocide and anti-fouling systems not containing these compounds or not containing these compounds at concentrations where they act as a biocide is reliably possible.

7 Definition of compliance

7.1 The analytical verification of the compliance will differ depending on the substances targeted as listed in Annex 1 of the AFS Convention.

Case A. Analysis of organotin only

Two-step procedure

7.2 The analytical verification of the compliance with the Convention for organotin compounds is performed in a two-step procedure according to the flow-diagram (diagram B).

Diagram B: Flow diagram illustrating the two-step analysis procedure for organotin compounds

Compliance with the criteria at the 'Step 1-level'

7.3 Compliance with the Convention is assumed when the results from the specimens 'A', analysed in step 1, meet the following:

  • .1 no more than 25% of the total number of samples yield results above 2,500 milligrams total tin per kilogram dry paint (2,500 mg Sn/kg of dry paint); and

  • .2 no sample of the total number of at least eight samples shows a concentration of total tin higher than the sum of threshold value plus the tolerance range, i.e. no sample must exceed the concentration 3,000 mg Sn/kg of dry paint.

7.4 If the results in specimen 'A' indicate that no organotin acting as biocide is present, then performing step 2 is not necessary.

Non-compliance with the criteria at the 'Step 1-level'

7.5 A positive result (non-compliance) is indicated if the provisions of paragraph 7.3 are not met.

7.6 A positive result at step 1 (specimen 'A') would indicate that step 2 should be undertaken, and those samples labelled specimen 'B' should be analysed in order to determine and characterize the organotin present (see diagram B).

Compliance with the criteria at the 'Step 2-level'

7.7 Compliance with the Convention is assumed when the results from the specimens 'B', analysed in step 2, meet the following requirements at the same time:

  • .1 no more than 25% of the total number of samples yield results above 2,500 milligrams total tin per kilogram dry paint (2,500 mg Sn/kg of dry paint); and

  • .2 no sample of the total number of at least eight samples shows a concentration of total tin higher than the sum of threshold value plus the tolerance range, i.e. no sample must exceed the concentration 3,000 mg Sn/kg of dry paint.

Non-compliance at 'Step 2-level'

7.8 A positive result in step 2 indicates non-compliance if the provisions of paragraph 7.7 are not met. Such results should be interpreted to mean that organotin compounds are present in the anti-fouling system at a level at which it would act as a biocide.

Case B. Analysis of cybutryne only

7.9 Compliance with the Convention is assumed when the results from specimen 'C', analysed in a one-step analysis for cybutryne, meet the following requirement:

  • .1 The average value of the total number of specimens shows a concentration below the threshold plus the tolerance range, i.e. 1,250 mg of cybutryne per kg of dry paint.

Non-compliance at the one-step analysis for cybutryne

7.10 An average value of the total number of specimens showing a concentration above the threshold plus the tolerance range, i.e. 1,250 mg of cybutryne per kg of dry paint, indicates non-compliance.

Case C. Simplified approach to detect organotin and cybutryne

7.11 Compliance with the Convention is assumed when the results from specimen 'C', analysed in a one-step analysis for organotin and cybutryne, meet the two conditions below:

  • .1 for organotin, the average value of the total number of specimens shows a concentration below the threshold plus the tolerance range, i.e. 3,000 mg Sn/kg of dry paint; and

  • .2 for cybutryne, the average value of the total number of specimens shows a concentration below the threshold plus the tolerance range, i.e. 1,250 mg of cybutryne per kg of dry paint.

Non-compliance at the one-step analysis for organotin and cybutryne

7.12 If one of the conditions set out in paragraph 7.11 above is not met, this indicates non-compliance. Such results should be interpreted to mean that cybutryne or organotin is present in the anti-fouling system at a level at which it would act as a biocide.

Appendix to Method 1

RECORD SHEET FOR THE BRIEF SAMPLING PROCEDURE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONVENTION IN TERMS OF THE PRESENCE OF ORGANOTIN AND/OR CYBUTRYNE ACTING AS A BIOCIDE IN ANTI-FOULING SYSTEMS ON SHIP HULLS

RECORD SHEET:
GUIDELINES FOR BRIEF SAMPLING OF ANTI-FOULING SYSTEMS ON SHIPS - ORGANOTIN AND CYBUTRYNE
RECORD NUMBER:
SECTION 1: Administration
1. Country 2. Name of port 3. Date
4. Reason for sampling
☐ Port State control ☐ Survey & certification ☐ Other flag State compliance inspection
5. Company details: 6. Inspecting official's details
1. Name of ship: 1. Name:
2. Distinctive number or letters: 2. Comments:
3. Port of registry  
4. Gross tonnage:  
5. IMO number:  
SECTION 2: Sampling
1. Time sampling procedure initiated:

2. Description of location from where samples were taken (frame number and distance from boot topping, refer to paragraph 3.2):




3. Number of samples taken (three or two specimens per sample):

4. Photographs taken of the sample point prior to sampling?
  ☐ Yes ☐ No
5. Time sampling procedure completed:

6. Additional comments concerning sampling procedure:

SECTION 3: Analysis and results
Case A. Analysis of organotin only
1. Step 1 total tin analysis:
Company name:
Analyst responsible: Date :
2. Specimen 'A' results: Total number of specimens 'A' analysed:
No. mg Sn / kg No. mg Sn / kg No. mg Sn / kg No. mg Sn / kg
1   5   9   13  
2   6   10   14  
3   7   11   15  
4   8   12   16  
Number of specimens exceeding 2,500 mg/kg:
1 or more specimens exceeding 3,000 mg/kg: ☐ Yes ☐ No
Conclusion: Step 2 required
Compliance, further analysis unnecessary:
3. Additional comments concerning analysis of results from Specimens 'A':

4. Organotin analysis undertaken by:
Company name:
Analyst responsible: Date :
5. Specimen 'B' results: Total number of specimens 'B' analysed:
No. mg Sn / kg No. mg Sn / kg No. mg Sn / kg No. mg Sn / kg
1   5   9   13  
2   6   10   14  
3   7   11   15  
4   8   12   16  
Number of specimens exceeding 2,500 mg/kg:
1 or more specimens exceeding 3,000 mg/kg: ☐ Yes ☐ No
Conclusion: Non-compliance
Compliance, further analysis unnecessary:
6. Additional comments concerning analysis of results from Specimens 'B':

Case B. Analysis of cybutryne only
1. A one-step analysis using gas chromatography/mass spectrophotometry (GC/MS)
Company name:
Analyst responsible: Date :
2. Specimen 'C' results:  
Total number of specimens 'C' analysed by GC-MS:  
Average concentration of cybutryne (mg of cybutryne per kg of dry paint):  
3. Conclusions:
The average concentration of cybutryne exceeds the threshold of 1,250 mg of cybutryne per kg of dry paint ☐ Yes ☐ No
4. Additional comments concerning analysis of results from Specimens 'C':

Case C. Simplified approach to detect organotin and cybutryne
1. A one-step analysis using gas chromatography/mass spectrophotometry (GC/MS)
Company name:
Analyst responsible: Date :
2. Specimen 'C' results:  
Total number of specimens 'C' analysed by GC-MS:  
Average concentration of organotin (mg Sn per kg of dry paint):  
Average concentration of cybutryne (mg of cybutryne per kg of dry paint):  
   
3. Conclusions:
The average concentration of organotin exceeds the threshold of 3,000 mg Sn/kg of dry paint ☐ Yes ☐ No
The average concentration of cybutryne exceeds the threshold of 1,250 mg of cybutryne/kg of dry paint ☐ Yes ☐ No
4. Additional comments concerning analysis of results from Specimens 'C':

SECTION 4: Final conclusion
Summarized conclusion:
  Compliance with AFS Convention assumed
  Non-compliance with AFS Convention assumed
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that this Record is correct in all respects.
Issued at __________________________________________________
(Place of issue of Record)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
(Date of issue) (Printed name and signature of authorized official issuing the Record)
  (Seal or stamp of the authority / organization)

Copyright 2022 Clasifications Register Group Limited, International Maritime Organization, International Labour Organization or Maritime and Coastguard Agency. All rights reserved. Clasifications Register Group Limited, its affiliates and subsidiaries and their respective officers, employees or agents are, individually and collectively, referred to in this clause as 'Clasifications Register'. Clasifications Register assumes no responsibility and shall not be liable to any person for any loss, damage or expense caused by reliance on the information or advice in this document or howsoever provided, unless that person has signed a contract with the relevant Clasifications Register entity for the provision of this information or advice and in that case any responsibility or liability is exclusively on the terms and conditions set out in that contract.