6.1 Screening procedure
6.1.1 Assumptions
The screening fatigue procedure is based on:
- Screening hot spot stress obtained by multiplying the stresses calculated from
fine mesh analysis according to Ch 7, Sec 3 by the stress magnification factor
of the considered structural detail.
- Mean stress effect and thickness effect are used according to Ch 9, Sec 3, [3.2]
and Ch 9, Sec 3, [3.3].
6.1.2 Procedure
The screening fatigue procedure includes the following three phases:
a) Phase 1: Calculation of fatigue stress.
- Stresses are calculated at the stress read out point from the fine
mesh element analysis with elements size of 50 × 50 mm, according to Ch 7, Sec 3
for all fatigue load cases defined in Ch 9, Sec 1, [7], for all loading
conditions. Stresses to be used are element average membrane components stress
defined in [6.2.3].
- Hot- spot surface stress components are calculated for each load
case ‘i1’ and ‘i2’ from the stresses multiplied by the stress
magnification factor η, taken as:
- σHS, i1(j) = η σS,
i1(j)
- σHS, i2(j) = η σS,
i2(j)
- Hot spot principal surface stress ranges are the difference of hot
spot stress components obtained for each load case ‘i1’ and ‘i2’.
- Fatigue stress ranges for welded joints are determined from hot
spot principal surface stress ranges with correction factor for mean stress and
thickness effect.
where:
σS, i1(j) : Stress calculated from the fine mesh analysis
in load case ‘i1’ of loading condition (j) defined in [6.2].
σS, i2(j) : Stress calculated from the fine mesh analysis
in load case ‘i2’ of loading condition (j) defined in [6.2].
η : Stress magnification factor given in Table 2.
b) Phase 2: Selection of S-N curve.
- The S-N curve D defined in Ch 9, Sec 3, [4] is to be used with the fatigue
stress range of weld toe in screening fatigue procedure.
c) Phase 3: Calculation of fatigue damage and fatigue life according to [6.1.3].
Table 2 : Stress magnification factor
Ship type
|
Structural detail category
|
Bulk hold
|
Stress magnification factor
|
Oil tanker
|
Toe of stringer
|
−
|
2.45
|
Bracket toe of transverse web
frame
|
−
|
1.65
|
Bulk carrier
|
Lower hopper
welded knuckle
|
FA (1)
|
2.28
|
EA or C (1)
|
2.00
|
Lower stool - Inner bottom
|
Non vertical (knuckle angle > 90°)
|
FA (1)
|
1.81
|
EA or C (1)
|
1.47
|
Vertical (knuckle angle = 90°)
|
FA (1)
|
2.09
|
EA or C (1)
|
2.75
|
(1) FA and EA
mean "full cargo hold in alternate loading condition" and "empty cargo
hold in alternate loading condition" respectively, C means “cargo hold
of BC-B and BC-C bulk carriers”.
|
6.1.3 Screening fatigue criteria
The total fatigue damage and the fatigue life of screened details are to comply with the
criteria given in Ch 9, Sec 3, [2].
Structural details that do not comply with the acceptance criteria are to be checked with
respect to fatigue strength using a very fine mesh finite element analysis as described
in Ch 9, Sec 5.
6.2 Stress read out procedure
6.2.1 Bracket toe
For bracket toe, the stress read out point is located at a 50 mm distance away from the
bracket toe as shown in Figure 23.
Figure 23 : Stress read out point at bracket toe
6.2.2 Knuckle detail
For the lower hopper knuckle and for the connection between transverse bulkhead lower
stool and inner bottom, the stress read out point is located at a 50 mm distance away
from the knuckle line (i.e. model intersection line) as shown in Figure 24.
Figure 24 : Stress read out point of knuckle detail
6.2.3 Read out point stress
The average of membrane stress components at the centre of four elements, modelled with
elements size of 50 × 50 mm connected to the stress read out point (or node) can be used
as read out point stress.
When the element size is less than 50 x 50 mm, the stress of read out point can be
derived using elements in an equivalent area as shown in Figure 25.
Figure 25 : Equivalent area for element size less than 50 × 50 mm