Section 2 Analysis for ISO 6954:1984
Clasification Society 2024 - Version 9.40
Clasifications Register Guidance Information - Ship Vibration and Noise Guidance Notes - Chapter 3 Analysis - Section 2 Analysis for ISO 6954:1984

Section 2 Analysis for ISO 6954:1984

2.1 This section details Lloyd’s Register’s interpretation of ISO 6954:1984 Mechanical Vibration and shock -Guidelines for the overall evaluation of vibration in Merchant Ships (1984). It should be used in conjunction with Ch 6, 5 Lloyd’s Register’s assessment of accommodation and workspaces based on ISO 6954:1984 .

The analysis is different to that used in ISO 6954:2000 and users should ensure that the appropriate version is being used.

2.2  Derivation of Vibration Levels

In order to define the correct procedure for interpretation of FFT analysis, it is useful to consider how the guidance vibration levels of ISO 6954:1984 were originally derived.

The measure of vibration severity used in ISO 6954:1984 is termed the maximum repetitive amplitude (MRA). The MRA is defined as the largest repeating value of the modulated signal of a single frequency obtained during sea trials. The sea trials are to be conducted in accordance with ISO 4867: Code for the measurement and reporting of shipboard vibration data and / or ISO 4868: Code for the measurement and reporting of local vibration data of ship structures and equipment.

The usual measuring system employed to collect the vibration data used in formulating the original guidance limits of ISO 6954:1984 included a chart recorder that provided a paper trace of the vibration signal. This trace was then manually analysed to determine the MRA for each significant excitation source.

A representation of a typical propeller excited hull vibration is shown in Figure 3.2.1 Maximum repetitive amplitude . It indicates modulation of the vibration amplitude due to variation of the propeller excitation forces. This vibration signal has been filtered to show only propeller blade passing frequency from which the MRA is readily identified. The value indicated is the peak-to-peak value, or twice the MRA. This is the value to be compared with the guidance levels given is ISO 6954:1984.

MRA’s for individual excitation frequencies can be readily evaluated using a sea trials measuring system that includes a chart recorder, a tape recorder and precision filters. However, this is laborious, and an FFT analyser is often used to provide a spectral analysis of the vibration signal. Unfortunately, as a consequence of the averaging process used in an FFT analyser, the modulation effects are suppressed and the MRA is obscured. A direct reading of the MRA as required by ISO 6954:1984 is not possible and it is therefore necessary to apply a correction factor in order to estimate the MRA.

Figure 3.2.1 Maximum repetitive amplitude

2.3  Use of FFT Analysers

When using an FFT analyser to provide the frequency spectra of a vibration signal there are, on a typical analyser, three analysis methods available, namely:

  • r.m.s. average
  • peak average
  • peak hold - not to be used for MRA estimates.

Each of these methods calculates a time-averaged level of vibration over the recorded signal length and, as a consequence of the averaging process, the true MRA cannot be directly calculated. Of these three averaging methods, the analysis procedure that most accurately reflects the true value of the MRA, as defined in ISO 6954:1984, is as follows:

  • Calculate the average r.m.s. value of vibration over the frequency range 1 - 100 Hz. The record should be at least two minutes long.
  • Multiply the average r.m.s. spectral values by a crest factor of 2.5 for propeller excited vibration to allow direct comparison with typical chart recorder traces or the ISO 6954:1984 guidelines.

The crest factor of 2.5 comprises:

  • A factor of 1.414 to convert from r.m.s. to peak values.
  • A tentative conversion factor of 1.8, as proposed in ISO 6954:1984, to account for the normal modulation of the vibration signal in sea state 3. The conversion factor is defined as the ratio of MRA to the average amplitude during steady speed trials.

It is stressed that the conversion factor of 1.8 is a tentative value that may vary between ships and/or trial conditions. It is therefore essential that the measuring equipment employed during sea trials provide a recording of the time based vibration signal, either digitally or on magnetic tape, so that if required, the true conversion factor can be calculated. This may be necessary in the event of possible design problems or questions relating to compliance with design specifications. For example, structural vibration due to machinery excitation is unlikely to have the degree of modulation typically associated with propeller excitation and therefore the use of 1.8 as the conversion factor will lead to an over estimate of the MRA.

2.4  Recommended analysis procedure

In the examination or the interpretation process of vibration signals, the fundamental step is to identify the excitation sources. For vibrations due to machinery, a factor of 1.414 to convert from r.m.s. values to peak values is normally adequate to assess the vibration severity. For propeller induced vibrations, however, a more cautious approach will be adopted.

In the case where the vibrations caused by propeller excitation are not considered to cause any complaints and that the levels are well within design specifications, the use of a crest factor of 2.5 is acceptable. However, in the event that the vibration levels are marginally within the design specifications and that possible problems or argument may arise, the vibration signals will then be subjected to vigorous examination in order to establish the true conversion factor. This examination process is:

  • to play back the recorded signal from a tape recorder onto an oscillograph measuring device to obtain a paper trace of the vibration signal;
  • a ‘filter’ will be used during the above play back process so that only the vibration signals related to the propeller blade passing frequency will be examined. The filter response and the bandwidth should be wide enough to capture the quickest modulations;
  • the recorded signal on the paper trace should be long enough to allow the establishment of MRA and the average amplitude;
  • the true crest factor will then be calculated from the MRA and average amplitude.

Copyright 2022 Clasifications Register Group Limited, International Maritime Organization, International Labour Organization or Maritime and Coastguard Agency. All rights reserved. Clasifications Register Group Limited, its affiliates and subsidiaries and their respective officers, employees or agents are, individually and collectively, referred to in this clause as 'Clasifications Register'. Clasifications Register assumes no responsibility and shall not be liable to any person for any loss, damage or expense caused by reliance on the information or advice in this document or howsoever provided, unless that person has signed a contract with the relevant Clasifications Register entity for the provision of this information or advice and in that case any responsibility or liability is exclusively on the terms and conditions set out in that contract.