3.5.2.1 For the fully loaded conditions mentioned
in 3.5.1.2.1, 3.5.1.2.2, 3.5.1.3.1 and 3.5.1.3.2 if a dry cargo ship
has tanks for liquid cargo, the effective deadweight in the loading
conditions therein described should be distributed according to two
assumptions, i.e. with cargo tanks full, and with cargo tanks empty.
3.5.2.2 In the conditions mentioned in 3.5.1.1.1,
3.5.1.2.1 and 3.5.1.3.1 it should be assumed that the ship is loaded
to its subdivision load line or summer load line or if intended to
carry a timber deck cargo, to the summer timber load line with water
ballast tanks empty.
3.5.2.3 If in any loading condition water ballast
is necessary, additional diagrams should be calculated taking into
account the water ballast. Its quantity and disposition should be
stated.
3.5.2.4 In all cases, the cargo in holds is assumed
to be fully homogenous unless this condition is inconsistent with
the practical service of the ship.
3.5.2.5 In all cases, when deck cargo is carried,
a realistic stowage mass should be assumed and stated, including the
height of the cargo.
3.5.2.6 A mass of 75 kg should be assumed for
each passenger except that this value may be reduced to not less than
60 kg where this can be justified. In addition, the mass and distribution
of the luggage should be determined by the Administration.
3.5.2.7 The height of the centre of gravity for
passengers should be assumed equal to:
-
.1 1.0 m above deck level for passengers standing
upright. Account may be taken, if necessary, of camber and sheer of
deck;
-
.2 0.30 m above the seat in respect of seated
passengers.
3.5.2.8 Passengers and luggage should be considered
to be in the spaces normally at their disposal, when assessing compliance
with the criteria given in 3.1.2.1 to 3.1.2.4.
3.5.2.9 Passengers without luggage should be considered
as distributed to produce the most unfavourable combination of passenger
heeling moment and/or initial metacentric height, which may be obtained
in practice, when assessing compliance with the criteria given in 3.1.2.5 and 3.1.2.6, respectively. In this connection,
it is anticipated that a value higher than four persons per square
metre will not be necessary.