1.1 In recent years there has been a significant
increase in the number of ship operators choosing to employ privately
contracted armed security personnel (PCASP) for protection against
attacks by Somalia-based pirates in the High Risk Area (HRA) of the
Western Indian Ocean and Gulf of Aden. According to the United Nations
Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) (part II, section I, article
2) and customary international law, a coastal State has sovereignty
in its territorial sea. This sovereignty within the territorial sea
is exercised subject to the rules of innocent passage as per UNCLOS
(part II, section 3), and other rules of international law. However,
no international guidance or standards exist at present for private
maritime security companies (PMSC) providing such services. Such guidance
would improve governance, reduce the potential for accidents, and
promote competent, safe and lawful conduct at sea.
1.2 Article 92 of UNCLOS refers to the flag State's
"exclusive jurisdiction on the high seas", and article 94 of UNCLOS
to "duties of the flag State." It is recognized that the decision
to allow PCASP on board ships is the prerogative of flag States and
not all flag States may allow their use.
1.3 PMSC should acknowledge the possible existence
of legal responsibilities with respect to the deployment of PCASP.
This should include PMSC seeking the appropriate approval, as applicable
and prior to embarking PCASP on board ships, from the competent authorities
in:
-
.1 flag States;
-
.2 countries where the PMSC is registered; and
-
.3 countries in which operations are conducted
or managed, including countries through which PCASP may transit.
1.4 The purpose of this guidance is to provide
interim guidance to PMSC to enable:
-
.1 the appropriate content and nature of the documented
procedures to be put in place, to allow shipowners to make an informed
judgement on the selection of PMSC; and
-
.2 PMSC to provide assistance to shipowners in
the prevention of acts of piracy and armed robbery against ships in
the identified HRA, through the considered deployment of PCASP.
1.5 This interim guidance is not legally binding
and is not in itself a set of certifiable standards. It does, however,
provide minimum recommendations on the competencies and abilities
a professional PMSC is expected to have.
1.6 This interim guidance to PMSC should be read
in conjunction with MSC.1/Circ.1405/Rev.2 on
Revised interim guidance to shipowners, ship operators and shipmasters
on the use of privately contracted armed security personnel on board
ships in the High Risk Area; MSC.1/Circ.1406/Rev.2 on Revised interim recommendations for flag States regarding
the use of privately contracted armed security personnel on board
ships in the High Risk Area; MSC.1/Circ.1408/Rev.1 on Revised interim recommendations for port and coastal States
regarding the use of privately contracted armed security personnel
on board ships in the High Risk Area; and the information provided
in MSC-FAL.1/Circ.2 on Questionnaire on information on port and coastal
State requirements related to privately contracted armed security
personnel on board ships, as well as the other recommendations and
guidance developed by the Organization for preventing and suppressing
piracy and armed robbery against ships.