1 This section applies to ships regardless of
the date of construction: Transverse sectional areas of deck flange
(deck plating and deck longitudinals) and bottom flange (bottom shell
plating and bottom longitudinals) of the ship's hull girder have been
calculated by using the thickness measured, renewed or reinforced,
as appropriate, during the renewal survey of the Cargo Ship Safety
Construction Certificate or the Cargo Ship Safety Certificate (SC
renewal survey) most recently conducted after the ship reached 10
years of age, and found that the diminution of the transverse sectional
area does not exceed 10% of the as-built area, as shown in the following
table:
Table 1 Transverse sectional area of hull girder
flange
|
|
Measured
|
As
built
|
Diminution
|
Transverse Section
1
|
Deck
Flange
|
cm2
|
cm2
|
cm2( %)
|
Bottom
flange
|
cm2
|
cm2
|
cm2( %)
|
Transverse Section
2
|
Deck
Flange
|
cm2
|
cm2
|
cm2( %)
|
Bottom
flange
|
cm2
|
cm2
|
cm2( %)
|
Transverse Section
3
|
Deck
Flange
|
cm2
|
cm2
|
cm2( %)
|
Bottom
flange
|
cm2
|
cm2
|
cm2( %)
|
2 This section applies to ships constructed on
or after 1 July 2002: Section moduli of transverse section of the
ship's hull girder have been calculated by using the thickness of
structural members measured, renewed or reinforced, as appropriate,
during the SC renewal survey most recently conducted after the ship
reached 10 years of age in accordance with the provisions of paragraph
2.2.1.1 of annex 12, and are found to be within their diminution limits
determined by the Administration, taking into account the recommendations
adopted by the Organization, as shown in the following table:
Table 2 Transverse section modulus of hull girder
|
|
Zact(cm3)*1
|
Zreq(cm3)*2
|
Remarks
|
Transverse Section
1
|
Upper
Deck
|
|
|
|
Bottom
|
|
|
|
Transverse Section
2
|
Upper
Deck
|
|
|
|
Bottom
|
|
|
|
Transverse Section
3
|
Upper
Deck
|
|
|
|
Bottom
|
|
|
|
Notes
*1 Zactmeans the actual section mooduli of the transverse section
of the ship's hull girder calculated by using the thickness of structural members
measured, renewed or reinforced, as appropriate, during the SC renewal survey, in
accordance with the provisions of paragraph 2.2.1.1 of annex 12.
*2Zreqmeans diminution limit of longitudinal bending strength of
ships as calculated in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 2.2.1.1 of annex
12
The calculation sheets for Z
act
should
be attached to this report.
3 This section applies to ships constructed before
1 July 2002: Section moduli of transverse section of the ship's hull
girder have been calculated by using the thickness of structural members
measured, renewed or reinforced, as appropriate, during the SC renewal
survey most recently conducted after the ship reached 10 years of
age in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 2.2.1.2 of annex
12, and found to meet the criteria required by the Administration
or the recognized classification society and that Zact
is
not less than Zmc
(defined in *2 below) as
specified in appendix 2 to annex 12, as shown in the following table:
Table 3 Transverse section modulus of hull girder
|
|
Zact(cm3)*1
|
Zmc(cm3)*2
|
Remarks
|
Transverse Section
1
|
Bottom
|
|
|
|
Upper
Deck
|
|
|
|
Transverse Section
2
|
Bottom
|
|
|
|
Upper
Deck
|
|
|
|
Transverse Section
3
|
Bottom
|
|
|
|
Upper
Deck
|
|
|
|
Notes
*1 As defined in note *1 of Table 2
*2Zmc means the diminution limit of minimum section
modulus calculated in accordance with provisions of paragraph 2.2.1.2
of annex 12
|
*1
Zact
means the actual
section moduli of the transverse section of the ship's hull girder
calculated by using the thickness of structural members measured,
renewed or reinforced, as appropriate, during the SC renewal survey,
in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 2.2.1.1 of annex 12.
*2
Zreq
means diminution
limit of the longitudinal bending strength of ships, as calculated
in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 2.2.1.1 of annex 12.
Describes the criteria for acceptance of the minimum section
moduli of the ship's hull girder for ships in service required by
the Administration or the recognized classification society.
Table A Condition Evaluation
Report
Issued upon completion of renewal survey
|
General Particulars
|
Ships Name
|
|
|
Class/Administration identity number: Previous
class/ Administration identity number (s) :
|
Port of registry
|
|
National Flag:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous national flag (s):
|
|
|
Deadweight (metric tonnes):
|
|
Gross tonnage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
National:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITC (69)
:
|
|
|
|
Date of build :
|
|
Classification notation:
|
|
|
Date of major conversion:
|
|
|
|
|
Type of conversion
|
|
Owner
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous owner (s) :
|
|
|
1 The survey reports and documents listed below
have been reviewed by the undersigned and found to be satisfactory
|
2. The renewal survey has been completed in
accordance with the present guidelines on
(date).....................................................................................................................................
|
Condition evaluation report completed by
|
|
Name
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Office
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
Condition evaluation report completed by
|
|
Name
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Office
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
Attached reports and documents :
|
|
|
|
|
1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table B Contents of Condition
Evalulation Report
Part 1
|
|
General
particulars:
|
|
See
front page
|
Part 2
|
|
Report
review:
|
|
Where
and how survey was done
|
Part 3
|
|
Close-up
survey:
|
|
Extent
(which tanks)
|
Part
4
|
|
Cargo
and ballast piping system:
|
|
Examined
|
|
|
|
|
Operationally tested
|
Part 5
|
|
Thickness measurements:
|
|
Reference to thickness measurement report
|
|
|
|
|
Summary
of where measured
|
|
|
|
|
Separate
form indicating the tanks/areas with substantial corrosion, and
corresponding:
|
|
|
|
|
thickness diminution
|
|
|
|
|
corrosion pattern
|
Part
6
|
|
Tank
corrosion prevention system:
|
|
Separate
form indicating : location of coating/anodes condition (if
applicable)
|
Part
7
|
|
Repairs:
|
|
Identification of tanks/areas
|
Part
8
|
|
Condition
of class/flag State requirements:
|
|
|
Part
9
|
|
Memoranda:
|
|
Acceptable defects
|
|
|
|
|
Any
points of attention for future surveys, e.g. for suspect areas
|
|
|
|
|
Extended
annual/intermediate survey due to coating breakdown.
|
Part
10
|
|
Conclusion:
|
|
Statement on evaluation/verification on survey report
|
Table C Extract of Thickness
Measurements
Reference is made to the thickness measurements
report:
|
|
Position
of substantially corroded tanks/areas or areas with deep pitting
|
Thickness diminution [%]
|
Corrosion
pattern2/
|
Remarks:
e.g. Ref. attached sketches
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remarks
|
|
|
|
1/
|
Substantial corrosion , i.e. 75% 100% of
acceptable margins wasted
|
2/
|
P =
Pitting
|
|
|
|
|
C =
Corrosion in general.
|
|
|
|
3/
|
Any bottom plating with a pitting intensity of 20%
or more, with wastage in the substantial corrosion range or having an
average depth of pitting of 1/3 or more of actual plate thickness should
be noted.
|
Table D Tank Corrosion
Prevention System
Tank Nos.1/
|
Tank
corrosion prevention system2/
|
Coating
condition 3/
|
Remarks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remarks
|
|
|
|
1/
|
All segregated ballast tanks and combined
cargo/ballast tanks should be listed
|
2/
|
C = Coating A = Anodes NP = No protection
|
3/
|
Coating condition according to the following
standard.
|
|
GOOD condition with only minor spot rusting.
|
|
FAIR Condition with local breakdown of coating at
edges of stiffeners and weld connections and/or light rusting over 20% or
more of areas unde consideration, but less as defined for POOR
condition.
|
|
Poor condition with general breakdown of coating
over 20% or more of areas or hard scale at 10% or more of under
consideration.
|
|
If coating condition is POOR is given, extended
annual surveys should be introduced. This should be noted in part 7 of
the contents of condition evaluation report.
|