Section 4 References
Clasification Society 2024 - Version 9.40
Clasifications Register Guidance Information - Guidance Notes for Offshore Wind Farm Project Certification, October 2022 - Chapter 1 Introduction - Section 4 References

Section 4 References

Parent topic: Chapter 1 Introduction

4.1 Reference documents

4.1.1 The following standards and other documents are referred to in these Guidance Notes:
  • API RP 2A-WSD Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms – Working Stress Design;
  • API RP 2GEO Geotechnical and Foundation Design Considerations;
  • API RP 2SK Design and Analysis of Station-keeping Systems for Floating Structures;
  • BS EN 10204 Metallic products: Types of inspection documents;
  • DNVGL-ST-0119 Floating wind turbine structures;
  • DNVGL-ST-0126: Support structures for wind turbines;
  • DNVGL-ST-0437: Loads and site conditions for wind turbines;
  • Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design worked examples;
  • IEC 61400-1 Wind turbines – Part 1: Design requirements;
  • IEC 61400-3-1 Wind energy generation systems – Part 3-1: Design requirements for fixed offshore wind turbines;
  • IEC 61400-12-1 Wind energy generating systems – Part 12-1: Power performance measurements of electricity producing wind turbines;
  • IEC 61400-12-2 Wind turbines – Part 12-2: Power performance of electricity-producing wind turbines based on nacelle anemometry;
  • IEC 61400-22 Wind turbines – Part 22: Conformity testing and certification;
  • IECRE Definitions;
  • IECRE OD-501 Type and Component Certification Scheme;
  • IECRE OD-502 Project Certification Scheme;
  • IMO Code for the Construction and Equipment of Mobile Offshore Drilling Units (MODU Code);
  • ISO 9001 Quality Management;
  • ISO/IEC 17020 Conformity assessment. Requirements for the operation of various types of bodies performing inspection;
  • ISO/IEC 17025 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories;
  • ISO/IEC 17065 Conformity assessment - Requirements for bodies certifying products, processes and services;
  • ISO 19901-1 Petroleum and natural gas industries – Specific requirements for offshore structures – Part 1: Metocean design and operating conditions;
  • ISO 19901-2 Petroleum and natural gas industries – Specific requirements for offshore structures – Part 2: Seismic design procedures and criteria;
  • ISO 19901-4 Petroleum and natural gas Industries – Specific requirements for offshore structures – Part 4: Geotechnical and foundation design considerations;
  • ISO 19901-8 Petroleum and natural gas industries – Specific requirements for offshore structures – Part 8: Marine soil investigations;
  • ISO 19901-10 Petroleum and natural gas industries – Specific requirements for offshore structures – Part 10: Marine geophysical investigations;
  • ISO 19902 Petroleum and natural gas industries – Fixed steel offshore structures;
  • ISO 19903 Petroleum and natural gas industries – Fixed concrete offshore structures;
  • ISO 19904-1 Petroleum and natural gas industries – Floating offshore structures – Part 1: Monohulls, semi-submersibles and spars;
  • ISO 19905-1 Petroleum and natural gas industries – Site-specific assessment of mobile offshore units - Part 1: Jack-ups;
  • Lloyd’s Register Guidance Notes for Wind Turbine Installation Vessels;
  • Lloyd’s Register Guidance Notes for the Classification of Wind Farm Service Vessels;
  • Clasifications Register Rules and Regulations for the Classification of Offshore Units; and
  • Measuring Network of Wind Energy Institutes (MEASNET) Evaluation of Site-Specific Wind Conditions.

4.1.2 In all cases the latest edition of the IEC 61400 and IECRE OD series of standards and operational documents respectively shall be used. The latest edition of other standards should normally be used, unless otherwise agreed with the client or applicant on a project-specific basis.

4.1.3 The following technical papers and industry publications are referred to in Ch 3 Additional Guidance on Geotechnical Aspects:
  • Achmus, M., Terceros, M., tom Woerden, F. & Thieken, K., 2017, Assessment of pile length criteria for monopile foundations, Society for Underwater Technology (SUT) OSIG Conference proceedings, Volume 2;
  • Andersen, K.H., Jostad, H.P. & Dyvik, R., 2008, Penetration resistance of offshore skirted foundations and anchors in dense sand. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 134.1, 106–116;
  • Buckley, R.M., Jardine, R.J., Kontoe, S., Liu, T., Ushev, E., Lehane, B.M., Pine, T, Schroeder, F.C. & Barbosa, P., 2017, Field investigations into the axial loading response of displacement piles in chalk, SUT OSIG Conference proceedings, Volume 2;
  • Byrne, B.W., Zdravković, L., Taborda, D.M.G., Potts, D.M., Jardine, R.J., Sideri, M., Schroeder, F.C., McAdam, R., Burd, H.J., Houlsby, G.T., Martin, C.M., Gavin, K., Doherty, P., Igoe, D., Muir Wood, A., Kallehave, D. & Skov Gretlund, J., 2015, New design methods for large diameter piles under lateral loading for offshore wind applications, ISFOG Conference proceedings;
  • Byrne, B.W., 2017, PISA: New design methods for offshore wind turbine monopiles, SUT OSIG Conference proceedings, Volume 1;
  • Carrington, T.M., Li, G. & Rattley, M.J., 2011, A new assessment of ultimate unit friction for driven piles in low to medium density chalk, 15th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering proceedings;
  • Ciavaglia, F., Carey, J. & Diambra, A., 2017, Time-dependent uplift capacity of driven piles in low to medium density chalk, Geotech. Lett., 7, 1-7;
  • CIRIA, 2004, Piled foundations in weak rock, CIRIA Report 181;
  • CIRIA, 2012, The rock manual: The use of rock in hydraulic engineering (2nd edition), CIRIA Report C683;
  • DGGT, 2013, Recommendations on piling (EA Pfähle), English translation, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Geotechnik;
  • Doherty, J.P., Houlsby, G.T. & Deeks, A.J., 2005, Stiffness of flexible caisson foundations embedded in nonhomogeneous elastic soil, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 131.12, 1498–1508;
  • Gilbert, R.B., Chen, J.Y., Materek, B., Puskar, F. & Verret, S., 2010, Comparison of observed and predicted performance for jacket pile foundations in hurricanes, Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 20861-PP;
  • Hamilton J.W. & Murff, J.D., 1995, Ultimate lateral capacity of piles in clay, Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 7667;
  • Houlsby G.T. & Byrne, B.W., 2005, Calculation procedures for installation of suction caissons in clay and other soils, Geotech. Eng., 158, Issue GE2;
  • Hutchinson, S., Young, M. & Macleod, A., 2010, Caisson breakwater design for sliding, Coastal Eng. Proc., 1.32, 48;
  • Jardine, R.J., Thomson, N.V., Mygind, M.A., Liingaard, M.A. & Thilsted, C.L., 2015, Axial capacity design practice for north European wind turbine projects, ISFOG Conference proceedings;
  • Jeanjean, P., 2017, A framework for monotonic p-y curves in clays, SUT OSIG Conference proceedings, Volume 1;
  • Kellezi, L. & Stadsgaard, H., 2012, Design of gravel banks: A way to avoid jack-up spudcan punch through type failure, Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 23184;
  • Kulhawy, F.H. & Phoon, K.K., 1993, Drilled shaft resistance in clay soil to rock, Proceedings of Conference on Design & Performance of Deep Foundations, Piles & Piers in Soil and Soft Rock, ASCE, Geotechnical Special Publications No 38;
  • Leblanc, C., Houlsby, G.T. & Byrne, B.W., 2010, Response of stiff piles in sand to long-term cyclic lateral loading, Géotechnique, 60.2, 79-90;
  • Lehane, B.M., Kim, J.K., Carotenuto, P., Nadim, F., Lacasse, S., Jardine, R.J., & van Dijk, B.F.J., 2017, Characteristics of unified databases for driven piles, SUT OSIG Conference proceedings;
  • Long, M., 1991, The behaviour of driven tubular steel piles in the laminated mudstones of south-west Ireland, Geotech. Eng., 113.4, 242-252;
  • Lord, J.A., Clayton, C.R.I. & Mortimore, R.N., 2002, Engineering in chalk, CIRIA Report C574;
  • McNulty, A.J.W., Grigsby, A., Humpheson, C., Duan, X., Willford, M.R. & Op den Velde, W., 2002, New developments in the design of concrete gravity substructures, Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 14189-MS;
  • Murff, J.D., 2012, Estimating the capacity of offshore foundations, SUT OSIG Conference proceedings;
  • Nielson, A., Sumer, B.M. & Petersen, T.U., 2014, Sinking of scour protections at Horns Rev 1 offshore wind farm, Coastal Eng. Proc., 1.34., 67;
  • Reese, L.C. & Van Impe, W.F., 2005, Single piles and pile groups under lateral loading, Balkeema Publishers;
  • Rodway, R.L. & Rowe, R.K., 1980, The uplift capacity of steel piles driven into Hawkesbury sandstone, Proceedings 3rd Australian and New Zealand Conference on Geomechanics, Wellington;
  • Rudolph, C., Bienen, B. & Grabe, J., 2014, Effect of variation of the loading direction on the displacement accumulation of large-diameter piles under cyclic lateral loading in sand, Can. Geotech. J., 51, 1196-1206;
  • Senders, M. & Randolph, M.F., 2009, CPT-based method for the installation of suction caissons in sand, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 135.1, 14-25;
  • Steenfelt, J.S., 2017, Sliding resistance of offshore gravity foundations, ISSMGE Conference proceedings;
  • Suryasentana, S.K., Byrne, B.W. & Burd, H.J., 2017, Simplified Model for the Stiffness of Suction Caisson Foundations Under 6 DOF Loading, SUT OSIG Conference proceedings, Volume 1;
  • Society for Underwater Technology (SUT) Guidance notes for the planning and execution of geophysical and geotechnical ground investigations for offshore renewable energy developments;
  • Thomas, S., 2017, A phased and integrated data interpretation approach to site characterisation, SUT OSIG Conference proceedings, Volume 1;
  • Whitehouse, R., 1998, Scour at marine structures, Thomas Telford;
  • Whitehouse, R., 2006, Scour at coastal structures, HRPP 490;
  • Whitehouse, R., Sutherland, J. & Harris J.M., 2011, Evaluating scour at marine gravity foundations, Proceedings of the Institution of Maritime Engineers, Maritime Engineering;
  • Williams, A.F. & Pells, P.J.N., 1981, Side resistance rock sockets in sandstone, mudstone and shale, Can. Geotech. J., 18.4, 502-513;
  • Zhang Y., Andersen, K.H., Jeanjean, P., Mirdamadi, A., Gunderson, A.S. & Jostad, H.P., 2017, A framework for cyclic p-y curves in clay and application to pile design in GoM, SUT OSIG Conference proceedings, Volume 2;
  • Zhu, F.Y., O'Loughlin, C.D., Bienen, B, Cassidy, M.J. & Morgan, N., 2017, The response of suction caissons to long term lateral cyclic loading in single-layer and layered sea-beds, Géotechnique, 1-13; and
  • Ziogos, A.D., Brown, M.J., Ivanovic, A. & Morgan, N., 2015, Interface shear characteristics of Scottish rock samples from sites with tidal energy potential, XVI ECSMGE Conference proceedings.
Copyright 2022 Clasifications Register Group Limited, International Maritime Organization, International Labour Organization or Maritime and Coastguard Agency. All rights reserved. Clasifications Register Group Limited, its affiliates and subsidiaries and their respective officers, employees or agents are, individually and collectively, referred to in this clause as 'Clasifications Register'. Clasifications Register assumes no responsibility and shall not be liable to any person for any loss, damage or expense caused by reliance on the information or advice in this document or howsoever provided, unless that person has signed a contract with the relevant Clasifications Register entity for the provision of this information or advice and in that case any responsibility or liability is exclusively on the terms and conditions set out in that contract.