Procedure for replacement of non-compliant lifeboat
release and retrieval systems
18 The procedure outlined below should be followed
in all cases where a lifeboat is to be fitted with replacement lifeboat
release and retrieval systems with on-load release capability. It
is noted that every lifeboat, complete with lifeboat release and retrieval
system, is type-approved at manufacture and it is important to recognize
that a lifeboat which is retro-fitted with a replacement lifeboat
release and retrieval system to the satisfaction of the Administration
should be regarded as offering a level of safety which is higher than
that of the original installation.
19 Companies should, where possible, select replacement
equipment acceptable to the lifeboat manufacturer. However, in cases
where the lifeboat manufacturer is unable to offer a suitable replacement
lifeboat release and retrieval system, the Company may select an alternative
lifeboat release and retrieval system, with the agreement, if possible,
of the lifeboat manufacturer.
20 The replacement equipment should be approved
by the Administration or a recognized organization acting on its behalf,
under the provisions of the LSA Code. Prior to the installation commencing,
the Company should submit to the Administration, or a recognized organization
acting on its behalf, for review and approval, as a minimum the following
information:
-
.1 the proposed replacement equipment including
approval certification;
-
.2 the engineering analysis of the replacement
installation including:
-
.1 drawings of the original lifeboat release and
retrieval system arrangement;
-
.2 detailed drawings showing clearly the proposed
changes (e.g., position of suspension, lifeboat release and retrieval
system, fixed structural connections of the release mechanism, link
plates, including materials used for nuts and bolts with regard to
strength and corrosion resistance); and
-
.3 if the drawings show that forces and/or force
couples will change and/or the lifeboat release and retrieval system
fixed structural connections of the release mechanism will change,
calculation of static forces including a safety factor of 6, according
to the LSA Code, from lifeboat release and retrieval system into lifeboat
structure, including tension and shear forces in bolts, link plates,
welds and keel shoe(s);
-
.3 considering that a lifeboat release and retrieval
system does not consist just of the hook assemblies themselves, but
also of release handles, cabling, etc., in the lifeboat, the evaluation
of a replacement hook assembly other than that originally provided
in the lifeboat should include such factors as loadings of the release
handle on the console, efficiency of any hydrostatic interlock in
light and loaded conditions, whether the size/configuration of the
replacement equipment would affect the stability or seating space
of the lifeboat, and its compatibility with its launching appliance;
-
.4 amended operating and training manuals; and
-
.5 identification of the person(s) responsible
for design appraisal, installation work and post-installation testing
and evidence of their competence.
21 The Administration, or a recognized organization acting
on its behalf, may allow that hook fixed structural connections of the release mechanism
and supporting structure which are not made of material resistant to corrosion in the
marine environment, as required by paragraph 4.4.7.6.9 of the LSA
Code, need not be replaced if they are in a good condition and installed in a
sheltered position inside the lifeboat. The assessment for verifying that fixed
structural connections and supporting structures are in 'good condition' should be
carried out by the manufacturer or by one of its representatives in accordance with
paragraph 23 below.
The assessment for verification is not required if the materials of the foundation,
bolts and supporting structure, both internally and externally, are made of materials
resistant to corrosion in the marine environment.
.1 Method of assessment:
- The assessment of fixed structural connections of the release mechanism and
supporting structures should be carried out according to the manual developed by the
manufacturer. However, if either such a manual or the original equipment
manufacturer, or any entity which has taken legal and legitimate responsibilities for
equipment when the original equipment manufacturer no longer exists or supports the
equipment, do not exist, this assessment should be carried out according to the
following method:
- .1 100% visual examination of all components within clear sight in order to assess
the general condition and look for signs of corrosion. No dismantling or removal of
components is required at this stage.
- .2 At least 25% of bolts for each hook fixation should be removed for visual
examinationfootnote. Additionally, a non-destructive testing (NDT)
technique, such as magnetic particle inspection (MPI), where suitable, may be
applied. If any of the removed bolts of the hook fixation shows signs of corrosion or
are deemed to be in "bad condition", then the rest of the bolts for the same hook
fixation should be removed and examined. As a general rule, any bolt that has lost
material to corrosion of 2% from the original dimensions should be deemed to be "in
bad condition" and replaced. Replacement bolts are to be made of material corrosion
resistant in the marine environment based on a like for like principle.
- .3 If fixed structural connections of the release mechanism or supporting structures
show signs of corrosion, then ultrasonic thickness measurement and corrosion mapping
should be performed. For this non-destructive examination (NDE) to be possible, the
probes need to have adequate access and the surface needs to be smooth and
appropriate for ultrasonic scanning. As a general rule, a backing plate that has
suffered corrosion wastage of 10% or more from the original plate thickness should be
deemed to be "in bad condition" and replaced. Replacement of structural connections,
backing plates, etc. are to be made of materials resistant to corrosion in the marine
environment and based on a like for like principle.
- .4 If after the assessment, the bolts, backing plates, keel shoes, etc. are in good
condition, then all parts are to be cleaned and recoated, if necessary.
.2 Backing plates and bolts installed outside the lifeboat and deemed to be in 'good
condition' after the assessment need not be replaced even when not made of material
resistant to corrosion in the marine environment.
22 A copy of the engineering drawing(s) approved
by the Administration, or by the recognized organization acting on
its behalf, should be used during installation and testing and retained
on board.
23 The installation should be carried out by the
manufacturer or by one of their representatives. All work carried
out should be witnessed by the Administration, or by a recognized
organization acting on its behalf. Valid operating and safety instructions
should be posted at the operating position and adjacent to the lifeboat
release and retrieval system(s).
24 Post-installation testing should be carried
out by the manufacturer or by one of their representatives and comprise
the following:
-
.1 1.1 x load and simultaneous release test according
to the Revised recommendation on testing of life-saving appliances
(resolution MSC.81(70)), part 2, paragraph
5.3.1, or an equivalent method acceptable to the Administration;
-
.2 load test according to the Revised recommendation
on testing of life-saving appliances (resolution
MSC.81(70)), part 2, paragraph 5.3.4, as amended by resolution MSC.226(82), if the fixed structural connections
of the release mechanism of the lifeboat is modified; and
-
.3 if the lifeboat is also a rescue boat and/or
is installed on a cargo ship of 20,000 gross tonnage or above, the
5 knots installation test should be carried out, in accordance with
the Revised recommendation on testing of life-saving appliances (resolution MSC.81(70)), part 2, paragraph
5.4.
25 All tests should be witnessed by the Administration,
or by a recognized organization acting on its behalf, which should
also verify that the installation complies in all respects with the
documentation submitted by the Company and approved by the Administration,
or a recognized organization acting on its behalf.
26 Following completion of installation testing,
the Administration, or a recognized organization acting on its behalf,
should issue a Statement of Acceptance, using the template set out
in appendix 4, to the Company, for retention on board.
|