Australia - Specific requirements by the Australian Administration

Flag instructions relating to statutory surveys

Flag procedural requirements

General policy

Agreement

A revised Agreement between the Society and the Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA) is effective from the 1^st July 2013. This Agreement provides for a large delegation of Statutory activities to the Society.

An Amendment to this Agreement has been signed between the Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA) and Recognised Organisation (RO) Marine & Offshore SAS, it enters into force on 1^st January 2017.

The Agreement and its Amendment are displayed as Annexes (see Agreement governing the provision of statutory survey and certification services) with their Appendix 1 “Applicable Instruments and Degree of Authorization” (see Appendix 1 to the Agreement) and Appendix 2 “Audit arrangements”(see Appendix 2 to the Agreement).

“Instructions to Classification Societies (Recognised Organisations)” are detailed in Instructions to Classification Societies.

Updated instructions to Classification Societies are available in AMSA sharepoint at the following address (Restricted access: contact SSQM from Recognised Organisation (RO) Australia for access to any information or document):

https://100255.sharepoint.com/teams/recognisedorganisations/SitePages/Welcome.aspx

(Minutes of Meeting between AMSA and ROs dated 29 and 30 May 2013)

Only relevant sections of the ITC can be released to shipyard and other relevant parties. However, it should be brought to the notice of the shipyard and other relevant parties that this is subject to change.

Marine Orders

In addition, the maritime subsidiary legislation in Australia is developed and maintained in the Marine Orders, issued by the Australian Maritime Administration (AMSA). The current Marine Orders (valid for convention size vessels under SOLAS or MARPOL) can be downloaded from AMSA web site:

https://www.amsa.gov.au/about/regulations-and-standards/index-marine-orders

Marine Notices

Moreover, the Recognised Organisation (RO) surveyor should ensure they keep themselves apprised of Marine Notices as they are issued. Marine Notices can be accessed directly at:

https://www.amsa.gov.au/about/regulations-and-standards/index-marine-notices

The Agreement provides for authorisation to survey the Australian registered ships for the issuance, e.g., of:

1. Safety Certificates as provided for by SOLAS Convention,

2. IOPP, NLS and ISPP Certificates as provided for by MARPOL Convention,

3. IAPP and EIAPP Certificates as provided for by MARPOL Convention,

4. IEE statement of compliance,

5. Certificates of Fitness as provided for by the EGC, GC, IGC, IBC and BCH Codes,

6. International Load Line Certificate,

7. International Tonnage Certificate,

8. Mobil Offshore Drilling Unit Safety Certificate.

9. Special Purpose Ship Safety Certificate

10. IAFS Certificate

11. MLC Certificate

This authorisation also permits Recognised Organisation (RO) to approve related stability documentation, evaluate calculations and approve procedures / plans / manuals.

This authorisation also permits Recognised Organisation (RO) to approve related material and equipment.

For authorisation where Conventions are not applicable in part or in full, refer to Annex 2 to schedule 1 “Applicable instruments and degree of authorisation where Conventions are not applicable in part or in full”, as per Appendix 1 to the Agreement. Recognised Organisation (RO) is authorised for revised Marine Order 52 giving effect to the UK MCA LY3 Code as modified by the Australian National Annex (see Australian National Annex to LY3)

Exemptions, Waivers and Equivalents

See Instructions to Classification Societies, paragraph 5 of the attached file.

In addition to ITC, AMSA has constructed a dedicated form for exemptions and equivalences (see attached file “amsa-288-application-for-an-exemption-equivalence-08122023”). This form is to use when applying for any relevant dispensation to AMSA FSC, and shall be submitted to fsc@amsa.gov.au email address or via mail to their Canberra offices.

The review and final submission of the application to AMSA shall be made by Recognised Organisation (RO).

Discretion in relation to exemptions, waivers and equivalents rests with AMSA.

These powers are exercised on the advice of Recognised Organisation (RO) as follows.

Whenever a request from the owner is received for initial exemptions or equivalences, Recognised Organisation (RO) must first review the request and if it is deemed the request has merit, a submission which comprises of the following information should be forwarded to Principal Surveyor, FSC at AMSA:

• The reference to the Marine Order or convention giving the power for the exemption or equivalence,

• The clause applicable for which the exemption / equivalence is being requested.

• Supporting documentation, e.g. plans, documents, risk assessments

• Any conditions considered appropriate, and

• Recommendation if the request should be granted

AMSA will make a decision taking the submission from Recognised Organisation (RO) into account, and other considerations. Subject to the decision, a certificate will be issued and sent to the vessel’s owner / operator with a copy provided to Recognised Organisation (RO). If AMSA considers the request for exemption or equivalence is not valid all parties will be notified accordingly.

Subsequent issuance of an exemption, waiver or equivalent related to a delegated RO function will be carried out by the RO following verification that all conditions imposed for initial issue (or re-issue if updated) of the exemption, waiver or equivalent continue to be complied with. Unless the RO has ascertained that no changes have been made to the vessel’s structure, equipment, arrangement or operations in relation to the exemption, waiver or equivalent, the RO is to contact the Manager Ship Inspection and Registration or Principal Marine Surveyor, FSC to confirm there are no objections to the subsequent issue of the exemption, waiver or equivalent. The “Waiver certificate” is avalable in Certificate Editor.

The above means that Recognised Organisation (RO) is to confirm with Manager Ship Inspections that there are no objections to the subsequent issue of an exemption, waiver or equivalent even when there have been no changes to a vessel's structure, equipment or arrangement before the exemption, waiver or equivalent is issued.

Where the RO re-issues an exemption, waiver or equivalent the following words are to be incorporated:

“This <<Exemption, Waiver, Equivalence>> replaces AMSA <<EXxxxx, WAxxxx, EQxxxx>> dated <<DD/MM/YYYY>> which has now expired.”

Note: The reference AMSA document number is the original document as issued by AMSA. Where AMSA is required to re-issue an update to an exemption, waiver or equivalence and subsequent re-issue by an RO is to reference the AMSA re-issued document.

If a short-term exemption, waiver or equivalence is required (for example, due to some temporary malfunction of equipment), Recognised Organisation (RO) is required to carry out an appropriate risk assessment. If it is deemed an exemption, waiver or equivalence certificate may be issued, Recognised Organisation (RO) shall recommend to the Manager Ship Inspection & Registration conditions to be imposed for the issuance of a short-term exemption, waiver or equivalence certificate or letter based upon their risk assessment. AMSA may request an electronic copy of the risk assessment when considering the RO’s proposal.

See the attached file “risk-assessment-RO.docx” for the above risk assessment.

IACS Unified Interpretations or similar documents

(Instructions to Classification Societies §2.7.3, see Instructions to Classification Societies)

IACS Unified Interpretations (UI) or similar documents related to interpretations of international conventions that have not formally been adopted by the IMO processes by incorporation into an IMO resolution, circular or IMO documents promulgated as guidance in the implementation of convention requirements, are not to be applied to Australian vessels.

Any proposals to implement above IACS UIs or similar documents are to be addressed in accordance with the provisions of the applicable Navigation Act 2012 Marine Order (e.g. exemption, equivalence or waiver) specified which gives effect to the Convention, as applied to an Australian vessel, unless a UI is expressly provided for within the Marine Order.

The AMSA Manager Ship Inspection and Registration must be consulted and their agreement received before implementing any above IACS UIs or similar documents.

Applicable instruments

See Instructions to Classification Societies, paragraph 2 of the attached file.

Unless otherwise specified, surveys are to be carried out and certificates issued in accordance with IMO Resolution A.1053(27) Harmonized System of Survey and Certification.

In general Australia gives effect to IMO resolutions and circulars that may be included, as footnotes in the text of the conventions or promulgated as guidance in the implementation of convention requirements.

Navigation Act 1912 VS Navigation Act 2012

(Minutes of Meeting between AMSA and ROs dated 29 and 30 May 2013)

Certificates listed in the table under section 37 of the Marine Order 1 shall continue to remain valid under the Navigation Act 2012 until the certificate expires or the certificate is revoked (whichever is the earliest).

However, all exemptions and determinations issued under the Navigation Act 1912 shall become invalid on 1 July 2013 when the Navigation Act 2012 enters into force. These exemptions and determinations need to be reissued.

National Law VS Navigation Act 2012

New buildings, modifications to ships and existing ships entering Australian registry which are subject to the Navigation Act 1912

See Instructions to Classification Societies, paragraph 7 of the attached file.

Upon receipt of notification to build or modify an Australian ship on to the Australian registry (General Register and AISR), Recognised Organisation (RO) should liaise with Recognised Organisation (RO) Australia which inform the Manager Ship Inspection and Registration at the first opportunity.

The Manager Ship Inspection and Registration will assign a person for liaison between the parties.

The Manager Ship Inspection and Registration will advise what details and plans / drawings are required: In general AMSA will require general arrangement plan, fire control plan, lifesaving appliances (or safety plan where details are combined) in all cases, and freeboard plan (or equivalent), together with copies of the record of conditions of assignment, calculation of assigned freeboards and memorandum of assignment for load line is required.

New buildings, modifications and existing ships entering Australian registry must comply fully with all applicable Marine Orders (unless exemptions or waivers have been agreed by the Manager Ship Inspection and Registration).

New construction

(AMSA RO meeting dated 15/10/2014)

GA, fire and safety plan as well as Loadline Condition of Assignment, as specified in Instruction to Class societies, shall be sent to AMSA (fsc@amsa.gov.au) at the time of new construction.

Vessels engaged in sea trials overseas

(AMSA RO meeting dated 15/10/2014)

(Refer to ITC in Instructions to Classification Societies)

Vessels cannot be issued with full certification until the vessel has completed trials. However, no exemption can be issued without the provisional registration being issued. Therefore, Shipping Registration Office can issue provisional registration. And, full registration will be issued on completion of sea trials.

AMSA sea trial checklist is available in attached files.

Change of flag to Australia

For existing ships transferring to Australian registry the following applies: Details of exemptions granted to the ship by the previous flag State are to be referred to the Manager Ship Inspection and Registration. It is to be noted that discretion in relation to exemptions or waivers and equivalents rests with AMSA in all cases.

(AMSA RO meeting dated 15/10/2014)

Recognised Organisation (RO) shall make sure all existing exemptions are requested from, agreed and issued by AMSA.

Moreover, GA, fire and safety plan as well as Loadline Condition of Assignment and records of assignment, as specified in Instruction to Class societies, shall be sent in electronic form (as this is easier) to AMSA (fsc@amsa.gov.au) at the time of change of Flag.

PSC deficiencies

(Minutes of Meeting between AMSA and ROs dated 29 and 30 May 2013)

Normally, for structural defects / repairs, AMSA surveyors consider that a Recognised Organisation (RO) surveyor should attend the vessel. In these cases AMSA cannot accept the rectification of the defect(s) until they are repaired under the Recognised Organisation (RO) supervision.

In exceptional situations, Recognised Organisation (RO) may discuss the issue with the attending surveyor or the Area Manager.

Repairs to vessels

All required repairs are to be carried out to the satisfaction of Recognised Organisation (RO).

Marine Operational Centre is to inform AMSA of any significant temporary repairs e.g. after collision / grounding / damage, the fitting of temporary generators / boilers, etc.

Corrective actions

If, after allowing reasonable time to rectify, the general condition of a vessel or its equipment does not correspond substantially with the particulars of any of its statutory certificates, or if its condition is found to be such that the vessel is not fit to proceed to sea without danger to the ship or persons on-board, or is presenting an unreasonable threat of harm to the marine environment, then Recognised Organisation (RO) shall immediately revoke the applicable statutory certificates and notify AMSA.

In instances where the requirements of a relevant Convention cannot be met under particular circumstances (e.g. appropriate repair or service facilities are not available), an email or facsimile report is to be without undue delay sent to AMSA giving details of the problem and arrangements made.

Reporting of cases where a ship does not in all respects remain fit to proceed to sea without danger to the ship or persons on-board or presenting unreasonable threat of harm to the environment

Recognised Organisation (RO) shall promptly inform AMSA when a ship is found to be in operation with deficiencies or discrepancies such that the condition of the ship or its equipment does not correspond substantially with the particulars of its certificates or the requirements of applicable instruments such that, in the opinion of Recognised Organisation (RO) the ship is not fit to proceed to sea without danger to the ship, the safety and welfare of persons on-board, or an unreasonable threat of harm to the environment.

If corrective action is not taken to the satisfaction of Recognised Organisation (RO), then Recognised Organisation (RO) shall withdraw the relevant certificates (with the exception of AFS certificates) and so inform AMSA. (Only AMSA can withdraw AFS Certificates, so Recognised Organisation (RO) is to inform AMSA if withdrawal of such certificates is warranted.)

Reporting

Recognised Organisation (RO) shall, as soon as possible after completing the initial survey and inspection functions as per Schedule 1 to the Agreement, send AMSA a confirmation to the effect that the ship complies with the relevant requirements and that all reports on initial surveys of the same requirements have been received, controlled and filed.

A copy of general arrangement drawings and fire control plan shall be obtained from the owner and submitted to AMSA by Recognised Organisation (RO) for ships that have not been previously registered in either of the Australian Shipping Registers.

For all ships with a Load Line length above 24 m, a copy of the Load Line initial survey reports, freeboard calculations, conditions of assignment and approved intact stability data, as required to be on-board by applicable instruments, shall be submitted to AMSA by Recognised Organisation (RO) for reference purposes.

Whenever a tonnage certificate is issued for a ship that will be or has been registered in either of the Australian Shipping Registers, or whenever a tonnage certificate issued by a foreign authority or another RO is accepted temporarily in connection with registration in Australia, Recognised Organisation (RO) shall immediately forward one copy of that certificate to AMSA.

If discrepancies, in relation with a recommendation being three months overdue and of a kind that does not affect the validity of a statutory certificate, are not rectified within an additional period of one month, then Recognised Organisation (RO) shall submit a report to AMSA explaining Recognised Organisation (RO)’s intended further action.

With respect to classed Australian flag ships that are in the jurisdiction of the Navigation Act, Recognised Organisation (RO) is to provide copies of the following to AMSA as soon as reasonably practical after they have been issued or produced:

1. Statutory certificates issued as permitted, in pdf

2. Survey reports associated with the issue of statutory certificates, in pdf

3. Reports of any unscheduled inspections of the ship where these are associated with a deficiency or detention identified during PSC

4. Class recommendations issued

5. Recognised Organisation (RO) reports in relation with the detention of, damage to or loss of an Australian flag ship

6. Reports of marine incidents

Refer also to Instructions to Classification Societies, paragraph 3.3 of the attached file.

Plan approval

(AMSA RO meeting dated 15/10/2014)

Plan approvals when conducted on behalf of AMSA, e.g. fire and safety plan, etc., must take account of where Australia has variations to conventions and needs to clearly refer Marine Order nos. (latest versions from AMSA website), e.g. MO 25 needs to be mentioned on the plan for EPIRB in liferaft. Simple verification onboard is not sufficient.

Issue of Australian Statutory Certification prior to Australian registration

1. (AMSA email Ref 2010/893 dated 08/06/2018)

   Australian registration must be complete and Recognised Organisation (RO) shall obtain satisfactory evidence of registration, such as a copy of the certificate of Australian registration, prior to issue of any relevant statutory certification.For the purposes of registration evidence of tonnage may be required. An International Tonnage Certificate (ITC) is however a statutory certificate. In the application for registration, the Shipping Registration Office will accept either:

   • An attestation of tonnage issued by a recognised organisation; or

   • A draft tonnage certificate

   Once the registration has completed Recognised Organisation (RO) may issue the ITC.

2. (ITC, see Instructions to Classification Societies §18.1)

   For the purpose of the registration, where construction is sufficiently advanced to accurately determine the volumetric arrangements on the vessel in order to establish a Tonnage Measurement, a ‘Statement of Compliance for Tonnage’ or equivalent issued by the RO may be submitted to AMSA FSC / SRO.

Electronic Certificates

Untitled

(Administration email dated 30/10/2018)

Recognised Organisation (RO) is authorized, upon Owner’s request, for ships flying the Australian flag and for the delegated statutory certificates, to issue these certificates in an electronic format in accordance with IMO Guidelines FAL.5/Circ.39/Rev.2.

This agreement is limited to those Statutory E-Certificates as detailed in IMO “List of Certificates and Documents required to be carried on board ships 2017” issued vide FAL.2/Circ.131, MEPC.1/Circ.873, MSC.1/Circ.1586, LEG.2/Circ.3 dated 19 July 2017, as amended.

Untitled

A copy of each electronic certificate (new certificate or endorsed certificate) is to be sent to the Administration. For that, the MOC of the ship shall add this email address FSC@amsa.gov.au in Neptune when the Owners accepted digital certificates.

Instruction on arrangements “... to the satisfaction of the Administration”

(Instructions to Classification Societies §2.7.4, see Instructions to Classification Societies)

a) Where a Convention/Code makes reference to the statement: “... to the satisfaction of the Administration”, Recognised Organisation (RO) must consult the Administration where it is proposed to apply an interpretation referenced under IACS Unified Interpretations or similar documents, noting the following:

• where an individual classification society interpretation is proposed, details of the interpretation being applied and

• examples of the application applied on behalf of another flag Administration, including copies of that Administration’s acceptance together with any conditions that may have been applied

are to accompany the request.

b) Where a Code makes reference to the statement: “... to the satisfaction of the Administration” (e.g. the Life Saving Appliances Code (LSA Code)) and where the equipment or appliance already holds a Type Approval Certificate issued by another flag Administration or its appointed recognised organisation on its behalf; and that recognised organisation is also an AMSA appointed recognised organisation, then the Type Approval certification, and conditions as issued may be accepted for the purposes of re-issuing Type Approval Certification under the Commonwealth of Australia flag.

In cases where no Type Approval Certificate has been previously issued, or the application relates to a new piece of equipment, then instructions in a) above are to be followed.

Remote surveys

(AMSA RO Meeting dated 27 March 2024 and dated 23 September 2024)

Statutory surveys of Australian vessels must be conducted in-person.

Under extraordinary circumstances, in line with those described in A.1186(330) Section 5.14 and Australia's own policies, the Administration may pre-approve an application for a remote statutory survey to be conducted.

In extraordinary circumstances, applications for a remote survey may be made by owners or operators using AMSA form 288, which must include a recommendation from their RO. It's expected that a request will include reasoning as to why the remote survey is an exceptional circumstance, noting poor planning or postponing a survey is not seen as an exceptional circumstance. Consideration will be made regarding the performance of the company, or how familiar the surveyor is with the vessel.

ROs must follow A.1186(33) and the Administration policy regarding remote surveys when surveying Australian vessels. Where an RO has undertaken a pre-approved remote survey of an Australian vessel, the Administration records must be retained as the Administration may review the process, procedure and record keeping as part of its audits.

Technical requirements

The Australian Administration displayed Marine Orders which can be viewed on the AMSA website at www.amsa.gov.au.

Application of IMO resolution and Circulars

(Administration email dated 02/11/2017)

AMSA position in respect to the application of IMO Circulars under Australian legislation is as follows:

1. Circulars issued by IMO have no mandatory effect, but many of them, for example MSC.1/Circ.1431, provide guidance as to good practice in the implementation of convention requirements and accordingly AMSA expects that good practice to be followed. This is similar to circulars on unified interpretation of convention requirements, which may in time be called up within the Marine Orders.

2. Other circulars such as MSC.1/Circ.1523 may provide for early implementation of convention requirements. Owners and builders are encouraged to give effect to these circulars, since the amended requirements to which they refer are invariably at least equivalent to the existing requirements that they replace. Issue of formal equivalences is not required since the equivalence is indicated by adoption of the relevant amendments and issue of equivalents would require notification to IMO in accordance with clauses such as SOLAS I/5(b) and II-2/17.5. However, AMSA cannot force the early implementation of requirements through Marine Orders as compliance is not legally required until the international entry into force of the relevant requirements.

LL 66

Loadline certificate

See Instructions to Classification Societies, paragraphs 6.7, 10 and 19 of the attached file.

General

International Convention on Load Lines is to be interpreted in accordance with the unified interpretations of the convention, Load Line Circulars LL.3/Circ.55, LL.3/Circ.69 and LL.3/Circ.77.

Recognised Organisation (RO) may only issue a full term Load Line Certificate to a ship when its stability data has been approved.

Intact stability data

Any departure from the requirements of MO.12 must be referred to the Manager Ship Inspection and Registration.

Inclining experiment and stability data complying in full with the relevant annexes to IMO Resolution MSC.267(85) 2008 International Code on intact stability may be approved by Recognised Organisation (RO) subject to the following:

1. The Manager Ship Inspection and Registration must be informed in advance of, and his agreement obtained for, inclining by liquid transfer.

2. Where total liquids on board exceed 25% of lightship displacement approval from the Manager Ship Inspection and Registration must be sought.

3. The Manager Ship Inspection and Registration must be informed in advance of, and his agreement obtained for, use of heel measuring device other than pendulum.

4. Where {w.d}/x values depart from the mean by more than 5%, the as inclined GM must be determined by the lower bound of a 95% confidence interval applied to the sample of GM values from all movements of all pendulums to ensure that safety is not prejudiced by that departure.

Regulated Australian Vessels (RAVs)

(AMSA RO meeting dated 15/10/2014)

Only International Load Line Certificates are to be issued to RAVs, in accordance with the convention

Non convention vessels

Domestic Commercial Vessels (DCV)

(Email from the Administration dated 04/12/2013)

Recognised Organisation (RO) is urged to liaise with relevant owners and

1. Firstly, withdraw any ILLCs issued to DCVs on or after 1 July 2013 and replace them with Statements of Compliance for Load Line (available in the “LOAD LINE” part of ASMS Certificates Editor).

2. Secondly, withdraw ILLCs issued to other DCVs and replace as above; and

3. Thirdly, for these and future DCVs, survey to Domestic Commercial Vessel Division (DVD) requirements and issue only DVD certification.

DCV are not required to have ILLC nor will the capability be captured in MO16. Where a DCV is certified and marked as required by the USL code that is sufficient. These issues will be dealt with in MO503 and MO507.

A DCV should not need a separate LLC if:

1. it has a National Law Certificate of Survey, and

2. it is marked in accordance with either:

   1. the applicable USL Code provisions, or

   2. Recognised Organisation (RO) specifications (in the case of vessels that have to be maintained to Recognised Organisation (RO) rules).

(AMSA RO meeting dated 15/10/2014)

Recognised Organisation (RO) is not authorised to issue an “Australian Load Line Certificate” to a DCV.

Unmanned barges

(Email from the Administration dated 19/01/2017).

When an International Load Line Certificate on behalf of the Government of Australia for a Type B unmanned barge is issued, and when a reduction in freeboard has been assigned in accordance with the Reg 27 (14)(c) of the convention, the ILLC should be marked to show the following:

1. The Type of ship on the ILLC should be marked as “Type “B” with reduced freeboard”

2. The ILLC shall state the following:

   • i. “Unmanned barge assigned a 25% reduction in freeboard in accordance with Reg 27 (14)(c)”

   • ii. Where the vessel undertakes manned operations, a draft reduction shall be imposed, such that the reduction of freeboard applied in (i) has been removed.

SOLAS 74

Cargo Ship Safety Construction Certificate

See Instructions to Classification Societies, paragraphs 6.1, 6.7, 7.6, 15.2, 15.4 and 15.5 of the attached file.

Ship’s machinery, arrangements, lifts, ER (Engine Room) cranes, gas welding, cutting equipment and hold access

All vessels are to comply with the requirements in MO 12.

If full compliance is not possible, alternatives may be considered if detailed proposals can be provided to the Manager Ship Inspection and Registration. Any proposed alternatives must be based on class instructions (CRI) and / or international standards.

Asbestos

From 31 December 2003 it is illegal to import, store, supply, sell, install or use any products containing asbestos (except in limited circumstances) in Australian maritime workplaces. New built ships must therefore be asbestos free.An Australian vessel that had asbestos product fixed or installed (i.e. insitu) prior to 31 December 2003 is permitted to retain asbestos if it does not constitute a risk to users until the asbestos contained in the product is disturbed. In this case the vessel must carry an appropriate asbestos register and an asbestos management plan.Where, during routine surveys, evidence is found or presented to the Recognised Organisation (RO) surveyor that asbestos may be onboard the ship that is not in accordance with the vessel’s asbestos register (or an asbestos register is not available), then they must inform Manager Ship Inspection and Registration or the nearest AMSA office.

For new ships, the owner is to confirm to Recognised Organisation (RO) that the laws and conditions under which it was issued are equivalent to Australian law – i.e. asbestos free means zero asbestos detected on samples analysed according to the Australian standard or equivalent.

(Minutes of Meeting between AMSA and ROs dated 29 and 30 May 2013)

AMSA will accept an asbestos free certificate issued by a NATA accredited laboratories as well as laboratories accredited by class.

Pressure vessels

All pressure vessels, such as pneupress tanks, portable air compressor units and calorifiers, not under class are to be included in the safety construction survey.

Extension of dry-dock periodicity

(Instructions to Classification Societies §7.3.3, see Instructions to Classification Societies)

AMSA will accept Extended Dry-Docking Intervals (EDDI) utilising the provisions of s.40 (3) of Marine Order 31:

“40 Requirement for dry-dock inspections of the bottom of a vessel:

(1) A vessel must have, in any 5 year period, at least 2 dry-dock inspections of the outside of the bottom of the vessel.

(2) The interval between any 2 inspections must be no more than 36 months.

(3) However, the owner of a vessel may apply to AMSA for approval for the vessel to comply with IACS Rec.No.133 Guidelines for Pilot Schemes of Extended Interval between Surveys in Dry-Dock – Extended Dry-docking (EDD) Scheme as in force from time to time, instead of complying with subsections (1) and (2).

(4) The application for approval must be made in accordance with Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013.”

In applying this, AMSA will only consider schemes that give full effect to the provisions of IACS Rec.133 and no scheme of individual Classification Societies that varies the recommendation will be accepted.

Any prospective Owner of a new vessel considering EDDI should complete an AMSA Form 288 (see Exemptions, Waivers and Equivalents) in respect of an application – Full details of how the EDDI will be implemented, including coatings etc., on the vessel are to be included (Administration email dated 24/04/2019).

Testing of watertight compartments

(Administration email dated 16/09/2022)

With respect to the application of IACS UR S14 Rev.6, submissions made to AMSA by RO for issuing an Approval of Equivalence of the use of IACS UR S14 in lieu of SOLAS II-1/11 (see IACS Unified Interpretations or similar documents) have generally been rejected.

Use of IACS UR S14 rev.6 without prior agreement by AMSA was raised by AMSA as a non-conformance at AMSA RO audit.

Use of the UR S14 without prior statutory approval has caused complications during new vessel constructions in order to re-establish tank and void testing schedules and procedures to the requirements prescribed by SOLAS II-1/11.

Lifting Appliances and Anchor Handling Winches (Marine Order 12)

(Administration email 2018/9523 dated 27/03/2026)

In accordance with Marine Order 31, section 5 (Survey Guidelines), the provisions of IMO Resolution A.1207(34) must be complied with. Appendix 2 - Diagrammatic Arrangement of the Harmonized System of Survey and Certification (HSSC) - is to be applied when determining survey windows for testing and/or thorough examination of lifting appliances.

Survey windows in accordance with IMO Resolution A.1207(34), Appendix 2, will only be permitted after lifting appliances have:

• been tested and thoroughly examined in accordance with the applicable IMO Guidelines, namely MSC.1/Circ.1663; and

• been permanently marked and provided with documentary evidence of their Safe Working Load (SWL),

no later than the first renewal survey on or after 1 January 2026.

Section 3.3.3 of MSC.1/Circ.1663 further provides that existing lifting appliances with valid certificates issued under another internationally recognised instrument acceptable to the Administration may be considered compliant.

Acceptance of existing lifting appliances will be determined by the Administration on a case-by-case basis. Sufficient evidence must be provided to demonstrate compliance with an internationally recognised standard acceptable to Administration.

In alignment with MSC.1/Circ.1663 and MSC.1/Circ.1662, the Administration intends to clarify in forthcoming amendments to Marine Order 12, that a competent person for a regulated Australian vessel is:

1. the manufacturer of the equipment; or

2. the vessel’s recognised organisation or classification society responsible for survey and inspection under a classification scheme; or

3. a testing establishment that the Administration is satisfied is competent to test and examine the equipment and has the necessary equipment and capability to perform such testing and examination

(Administration email 2018/9523 dated 06/05/2026)

All lifting appliances - irrespective of Safe Working Load, including those below 1,000 kg - must comply with the applicable provisions set out in:

• SOLAS Chapter II-1, Regulation 3-13; and

• Marine Order 12, Division 2A, Sections 13A and 13B (see Agreement).

No specific exemption or alternative determination has been made within Marine Order 12 in relation to lifting appliances with an SWL below 1,000 kg, unless explicitly provided elsewhere.

In effect, the requirements applicable to lifting appliances with a SWL below 1,000 kg are the same as those applicable to lifting appliances with a SWL of 1,000 kg or greater.

(Administration email 2018/9523 dated 13/05/2026)

The current provisions contained within Marine Order 12 – Division 2A (Lifting Appliances and Anchor Handling Winches) are intended to apply to lifting appliances fitted on foreign-flagged vessels to which Chapter II-1 of SOLAS applies, except for those appliances excluded under Regulation 3-13, paragraph 1.2.

However, it is not the intention that such vessels be required to demonstrate compliance with Chapter II-1, Regulations 3-13.2.1 and 3-13.2.4 where the vessel’s flag Administration has determined, in accordance with Regulation 3-13.1.3, that these requirements are not applicable to lifting appliances with an SWL below 1,000 kg.

Accordingly, for foreign-flagged vessels to which AMSA Marine Orders apply and in order to avoid undue delay to vessels in our ports, the vessel’s flag Administration should provide a determination confirming the applicability of SOLAS Chapter II-1, Regulation 3-13.1.3.

The Administration acknowledges that the current Marine Order 12 wording does not clearly distinguish this matter and consideration will be given to addressing this through a future amendment.

(Administration email 2018/9523 dated 07/07/2026)

Application to permanently installed Monorail Systems

A permanently installed monorail system comprising:

• a monorail beam (single I-beam permanently connected to the vessel's structure);

• a hoist trolley; and

• a permanently attached chain block or hoist,

is considered a lifting appliance for the purposes of SOLAS Chapter II-1, Regulation 3-13, and Marine Order 12.Accordingly, the complete lifting appliance is required to undergo examination, proof load testing, and certification in accordance with the requirements of SOLAS Chapter II-1, Regulation 3-13 and Marine Order 12, Division 2A, sections 13A and 13B.

Removable chain blocks

A chain block designed to be removable from the monorail system may be treated independently of the permanently installed lifting appliance where all the following conditions are met:

• the chain block is supported by a valid proof load test certificate or equivalent certification;

• inspection, maintenance and periodic examination are managed through the vessel's Safety Management System (SMS) and planned maintenance system; and

• the chain block remains identifiable, traceable and fit for service.

Where these conditions are not satisfied, including where the chain block is not supported by a valid test certificate or is not maintained in accordance with the vessel's SMS and planned maintenance system then the chain block is to be regarded as forming part of the lifting appliance and shall be included in the examination and proof load testing required under Marine Order 12.

Cargo Ship Safety Equipment Certificate

See Instructions to Classification Societies, paragraphs 6.2, 7.3.2 and 16 of the attached file.

Carriage of documents

In addition to the examination of current certificates and other records a vessel is required to carry, the surveyor should ensure that the vessel has ready access to copies of the following Australian legislation:

1. The Navigation Act 2012;

2. all relevant Marine Orders;

3. Occupational Health &Safety (Maritime Industry) Act 1993

4. Occupational Health & Safety (Maritime Industry) Regulations 1995

5. Occupational Health & Safety (Maritime Industry) (National Standards) Regulations 2003;

Lifeboat falls

Wire ropes used as lifeboat falls are to be inspected and renewed as specified in MSC.216 (82). The inspection of the wire is to be in accordance with MSC.1/ Circ.1206.Rev1.If a manufacturer, or person appropriately trained and certified by the manufacturer, is not available to conduct the inspection, the inspection is to be carried out by an experienced person, holding an appropriate qualification that must be acceptable to the Manager Ship Inspections and Registration.

Requirements for maintenance, thorough examination, operational testing, overhaul and repair of lifeboats and rescue boats, launching appliances and release gear (MSC 402(96))

(Administration emails dated 29/04/2020 and 05/06/2020)

Resolution MSC.402 (96), section 7.1 requires that service providers be certified under a recognised national, international or industry standard or a manufacturer’s established certification programme. This applies to each type and make of equipment and now covers launching devices. Section 7.1.4 requires there be access to manufacturer's instructions for repair work involving disassembly or adjustment of on-load release mechanisms and davit winches.

Section 8 requires that personnel for the work specified in paragraphs 4.2 and 4.3 be certified by the manufacturer or authorized service provider for each make and type of the equipment to be worked on in accordance with the provisions in this section. The education and training in section 8.2 is extensive and section 8 does suggest such training would normally be to the standard set by the manufacturer or someone authorised by the manufacture. The only time this varies is where the manufacture no longer operates or provides technical support, in which case 7.3 applies.

AMSA have formed the view that the certification programme applies to “each make and type of equipment for which service is to be provided”, rather than all makes and models. Applying the certification programme to all makes and models would be very restrictive and AMSA takes the view this is not the intent.

The Administration delegates the authorisation of servicing personal and facilities to Recognised Organisation (RO), in accordance with clause 8.9 of the RO Agreement.

Machinery space fixed fire extinguishing system

The Manager Ship Inspection and Registration should be contacted as early as possible with comprehensive system details and plans of any proposed machinery space fixed fire extinguishing systems and installations for his/her acceptance.

Specific requirement and interpretation on SOLAS II-2 and III

SOLAS Chapter II-2

The supply and pressure of the emergency fire pump for cargo ships of less than 2,000 GT are to have an alternative means of power.

The emergency pump must be capable of supplying two jets of water at a minimum pressure of 0.25 N/mm².

The maximum pressure at a hydrant must not exceed 0.65 N/mm². Spray nozzles must produce a spray that will not disturb a film of oil on water.

The nozzles and fittings for deck hoses on tankers and ships with similar fire hazard must not be aluminium alloy.

Portable fire extinguishers provided for use in a ship must so far as practicable have a uniform method of operation. When a ship is to be provided with a replacement or an additional extinguisher, the extinguisher must have a method of operation similar to the extinguishers already on board and, if practicable, must be of the same manufacture.

Fire extinguishers are to be of approved type with new and all replacement extinguishers to be compliant with requirements of MO 15 and the colour code requirements of AS 1841. Equivalent ISO Standards may be accepted under the provisions of 14.13

Dry powder extinguisher is a type of extinguisher that holds a mixture of the dry powder and an expellant under stored pressure.

1. Examination and testing of fire extinguishers

   All fire extinguishers must be serviced, inspected, pressure tested, recharged and maintained in accordance with Australian Standard AS 1851.1 except that a servicing period of five years is to be substituted for any servicing period of three years specified in this standard. A surveyor may specify a shorter servicing period if the extinguishers condition indicates this is required.

   On a cargo ship, servicing should preferably be arranged to coincide with the renewal of the Cargo Ship Safety Equipment Certificate.

   Where servicing cannot be carried out in accordance with Australian Standard, for example where the vessel is overseas, the inspection and servicing, may be carried out by a service supplier approved in accordance with IACS Z17 by the RO subject to approval of the Manager Ship Inspection and Registration.

2. Pressure testing of gas cylinders and bulk containers

   A gas cylinder which has been discharged, which shows a loss of contents, which has evidence of deleterious corrosion or other physical defect, or which is due for inspection and testing in accordance with Australian Standard AS2030 must be serviced at a test station approved by the Standards Association under the terms of Australian Standard AS2337. Where external examination of a full cylinder reveals no apparent deterioration, the period between the test after manufacture and the first periodic test required by AS2030 may be extended beyond ten years, but must not exceed twenty years. After the twenty year periodic testing, inspections should be at five-year intervals (as per requirements of MO 15 schedule 3).

3. Bulk CO₂ cylinders must be tested at the 10th anniversary of the cylinders initial test.

4. Type and location of fire extinguishers

   Where portable dry powder fire extinguishers are provided in accommodation and service spaces or in machinery spaces, their number must not exceed one half of the total number of extinguishers provided in either of those spaces.

5. In addition to those required, there must, in every galley of less than 15 m², be one (1) portable fire extinguisher and, in every galley of 15 m² or more, be two (2) portable fire extinguishers. There must also be a fire blanket stowed in a galley within close proximity to any stove on which oil may be heated for cooking purposes, provided that a surveyor may permit the blanket to be stowed outside a small galley.

6. Fixed fire detection and fire alarm system

   When carrying out a survey of the equipment of a ship, a maximum of 20 per cent of the total number of detectors must be tested by means of equipment specified in MO 15, and all detectors must be so tested in a period not exceeding five (5) years.

7. Arrangements for fuel oil, lubricating oil and other flammable oils used as fuel

   1. In addition to the requirements of MO25, fuel oil with a flash point of not less than 43°C must be used in motor lifeboat engines and emergency generators.

   2. A rescue boat may use oil fuel with a flash point of less than 43°C if it is fitted with a petrol-driven outboard engine with an approved fuel system and the fuel tank/s are specially protected against fire and explosion.

SOLAS Chapter III

1. Number of lifejackets to be provided

   A cargo ship must be provided with two (2) lifejackets for every person the ship is certified to carry.

   One is to be stowed in the cabin and the other in a working space or other readily accessible position.

   The requirements of IMO Resolution MSC.207(81) (“Adoption of amendments to the international Life-Saving Appliance (LSA) code”), in respect of the changes referred to under Chapter II paragraph 5, amending the wording to section 2.2 (“Lifejackets”) are to be complied with (particularly with the paragraphs 2.2.1.2 and 2.2.1.3).

2. Expiry date of distress flares

   Distress flares and smoke signals must be marked with a date of manufacture and a date of expiry. The date of expiry should not be more than 36 months from the marked date of manufacture.

   The signal is to be replaced where no date of manufacture is marked or it is more than 36 months old.

   If the marked date includes only the month and year of manufacture or expiry, the expiry date will be the end of the month so marked.

3. EPIRB in life rafts

   The normal equipment of a life raft must include an EPIRB.

   All 121.5 / 243 MHz EPIRB’s must be replaced with 406 MHz EPIRB’s before 01 Feb 2009.

   These EPIRBs must be a 406 MHz type complying with AS/NZ 4280.1 for a class 3 beacon as a minimum.

   However as a class 3 beacon may not be suitable for operation in temperatures below -20ºC, vessel which may operate in such conditions are to have an EPIRB capable of complying with section 2.5 of IMO Resolution A.810(19), as amended (amended by Resolution MSC.56(66), Resolution MSC.120(74)) (if installed before 23 November 1996, refer to A.763(18)).

   (AMSA RO meeting dated 15/10/2014)

   EPIRB and life raft are required to be certified for the same height in drop test, if a particular EPIRB is to be utilised for that liferaft on Australian registered vessels.

   The canister of Viking liferafts approved to be serviced every 3 years (refer to the Certificate of approval no. AP5413 and valid until 24 October 2021, in the attached file “CertificateOfApprovalAP5413.pdf”) had to have an access pocket and cover in order to allow the EPIRB to be serviced every 12 months. Subsequently the liferaft needed to be subject to drop test with this arrangement.

   (AMSA email dated 19/04/2018)

   QUOTE

   Subject: Marine Order 25 - Carriage of EPIRBs in liferafts of vessels < 500GT [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

   TRIM Ref: 2010/893

   Dear RO Representatives,

   A query was raised recently in respect to Marine Order 25 and the carriage of EPIRBs within liferafts for vessels less than 500 GT that are to be certified as Class 2A or 2B. Currently Subdivision 5.3 of the Marine Order omits the requirement for carriage of EPIRBs within liferafts. This is therefore inconsistent with the general application of the Marine Order in respect to all operational categories and vessel Classes. The intention of the Marine Order was that section 10 “Liferaft equipment” contained in Schedule 1 should have been placed in the body of the Marine Order between sections 39 and 48. This approach would also be consistent with the requirement of the NSCV C7A [Annex D.3.(iii)] also referenced within the Marine Order for liferaft requirements. When applying Marine Order 25 to regulated Australian vessels (RAV) please therefore consider that paragraph 16.7 of the Instructions to Class is applicable to all vessels of all classes when requiring carriage of liferafts under the Marine Order. This omission will be dealt with within the next scheduled revision of Marine Order 25.

   UNQUOTE

   (AMSA email dated 23/09/2021)

   QUOTE

   Subject: EPIRB Clarification for ABF Vessels

   From 1 January 2021, the EPIRB carriage requirements on domestic commercial vessels in Australia have changed.

   AMSA has recently received a query from a Recognised Organisation seeking clarification whether these changes would affect EPIRB requirements for Regulated Australian Vessels (RAVs) which include Australian Border Force (ABF) vessels. Under current carriage requirements for DCVs not all vessels have to carry float-free EPIRBs. The type of EPIRB required depends on vessel class, length, flotation and operating area.

   AMSA would like to clarify that ABF vessels (and RAVs) are regulated under Navigation Act 2012 and EPIRB requirements are listed in Marine order MO 27. The carriage of EPIRB is a requirement under Division 3 of Marine Orders 27. As MO27 gives effect to SOLAS chapter IV reg 7.1.6, the EPIRB should be float-free.

   Thus the EPIRBs on ABF vessels (and RAVs) are to be float-free type in compliance with Australian/New Zealand standard for 406MHz satellite distress beacons (AS/NZS 4280).

   UNQUOTE

4. Transferability of life raft

   A life raft weighing more than 185 kg (previously identified as 12 person) is not considered as being readily transferable, unless some means, such as trolley is provided to facilitate transfer by no more than two (2) persons against a list.

   Such transfer arrangements must have a free means of access from side to side and suitable launching arrangements at either side with appropriate lighting.

5. Immersion suits

   MO25 and SOLAS III/7.3, 22.4 and 32.3 do not require the carriage of immersion suits, anti-exposure suits or thermal protective aids if the vessel is engaged on voyages only in areas where the average monthly sea water temperatures are more than 15·C.

   The Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) data can be used for access to current sea temperature information and data for the Australian region at: http://www.bom.gov.au/oceanography/oceantemp/sst.shtml.

   The master must undertake a documented risk assessment to determine whether or not immersion suits or TPAs are required, and appropriate records maintained within the voyage planning system.

   Where the average monthly sea water temperature is 15·C or less immersion suits at work stations are required, as appropriate.

   AMSA considers the bridge and engine room as work stations and requires immersion suits at these areas according to the manning levels of the vessel.

   The number of immersion suits, in this regard, should be assessed on the same basis as lifejackets.

   In addition, AMSA considers the forecastle workshop of a cargo ship as a work station in the case of a forward life raft being required.

   For vessel not fitted with immersion suites according to the above requirements (vessels engaged on voyages only in areas where the average monthly sea water temperatures are more than 15·C), an exemption certificate is not required however a Statutory Memo or equivalent included by the RO on the vessel’s records to assist Surveyors not familiar with Australian Marine Orders is recommended – the vessel’s SMS would also be expected reflect the same including when the Master should embark immersion suits/ TPA’s for persons onboard.

   Vessel’s that are operating internationally/ and or are on an occasional overseas voyage for dry-docking: These are provided with an exemption certificate on request to AMSA to facilitate/ assist in the PSC process; Where the Cargo/Passenger Ship Record of Safety Equipment or non-SOLAS equivalent indicates that no immersion suits/ TPA’s are present on board. If a PSC inspection is performed such an exemption document would/ may be familiar to a PSCO and should not result in a deficiency or undue delay of the vessel.

6. Medical stores

   The classification society should verify that the vessel has onboard a certificate or equivalent that the onboard medical equipment complies with MO 11.

   The certificate is valid for 1 year from issue and can be issued by a doctor, pharmacist or suitably qualified nurse.

   (AMSA RO meeting dated 15/10/2014)

   Companies may apply to AMSA for reduction in medical requirements based on a risk assessment carried out for vessels operating within close range of medical assistance.

7. Lifts

   The classification society should verify that the vessel has onboard a certificate of inspection / test for any lifts fitted.

   The certificate is valid for 1 year from issue and can be issued by the manufacturer or approved service agent or a person or organization competent in service and inspection of lifts as fitted to the vessel.

   The certificate should verify compliance with MO12 and AS1735.

   A member of the ships crew would not generally be acceptable as an issuing authority for such a certificate.

8. Machinery space cranes and other lifting appliances

   The classification society should verify compliance with MO12.

9. SOLAS Chapter V and MO21

   As this chapter applies to all vessels, compliance with MO21 should be verified for all vessels receiving certification by a classification society on behalf of AMSA.

10. SOLAS Chapter III / Regulation 11.7

    (AMSA LSA Part 25, issue 7 July 2010)

    A knotted rope is not considered as “other means of embarkation”.

    However, other arrangements complying with 6.1.6 of LSA Code may be used.

    AMSA will also accept arrangements where the steps of ladders are made of materials other than wood where it has been accepted by Recognised Organisation (RO).

Recovery of persons from the water

Refer to the Marine Notice 12/2014 in the attached file “MarineNotice12-2014”.

SOLAS regulation III/17-1 will be applied to all regulated Australian vessels to which Chapter III of SOLAS applies.

(AMSA RO meeting dated 15/10/2014)

MO 25’s new requirements for recovery of persons from the water would not apply to foreign flag vessel’s less than 500GT operating on Australian coast.

Equipment Operation – Crew Demonstration

(Administration email dated 30/10/2018)

AMSA inspect both the seaworthiness of the vessel and the crews ability to operate the controls, navigation and equipment on board. Being able to operate the equipment and conduct appropriate drills is one way of testing that the ship will continue to remain safe.

During inspection, AMSA Port State Control Officers may be accompanied by Recognised Organisation (RO) Surveyors if requested by the owner or other shore based staff associated with the operation.

In the demonstration of any equipment or drills the Recognised Organisation (RO) Surveyors or other shore based staff are not to be involved. These elements are to be completed by the ship’s crew only.

If any interference with demonstration of equipment or drills occurs, the Recognised Organisation (RO) Surveyors or other non-essential staff may be asked to leave the inspection. Interference with the inspection does not allow for PSCO to ascertain the crews skills and potentially will count as the crew being unable to demonstrate the required elements.

Pilot ladder

(Administration letter dated 24 March 2023 in attached file “Pilot ladder letter - ROs - 24 March 2023”)

AMSA requires the following at every annual survey conducted by Recognised Organisation (RO) on a regulated Australian vessel:

1. The pilot boarding arrangements onboard are inspected. This includes all deck fittings, associated equipment such as stanchions, the actual pilot ladder, bulwark pilot ladder and man ropes.

2. The crew rig a pilot ladder in accordance with the current SOLAS CH V regulation 23 requirements.

3. Take photographic evidence of the condition of pilot boarding arrangements and the pilot ladder arrangements once rigged.

4. If the crew are not able to rig the pilot ladder in accordance with the current requirements, the annual surveys are not to be completed, and FSC are to be informed.

Sampling and testing of the extinguishing media containing perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) - MSC.1/Circ.1694

(Administration email dated 18/08/2025)

With reference to MSC.1/Circ.1694, for vessels to which AMSA Marine Order 15 (Construction — fire protection, fire detection and fire extinction) 2014 applies:

1. Extinguishing media which may include but necessarily be limited to aqueous film forming foams (AFFF) which is used for fire-fighting purposes on board vessels and installed prior to 1st Jan 2026:

   • Where original equipment manufacturers (OEM) tests and/ or laboratory reports are not available:

     Such foams must be tested by a NATA or other equivalent internationally accredited laboratory that has the capability to undertake the required testing and issue an appropriate report: This is relevant particularly to those foams that are "containing perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS)" in their composition which are harmful to the safety of personnel involved.

     Such reports must be available for inspection on board.

   • For foreign flag vessels (FFV) that visit Australian Ports, foam test results from a nationally accredited testing facility (NATA  equivalent) which tests to a national or internationally recognised e.g, ISO, European, BS, JIS, DIN or similar standard may be  acceptable.

2. Extinguishing media which may include but necessarily be limited to aqueous film forming foams (AFFF) which is used for fire-fighting purposes on board vessels and installed on or after 1st Jan 2026:

   For the purposes of meeting paragraph 3 of MSC.1/Circ.1694:

   The declaration issued by the foam maker must contain information about the foam such as, but not limited to: foam type, production period, batch number, reference to type approval/Marine Equipment Directive (MED) Certificate* for the foam.

   ‘*’ For Australian vessels to which Marine Order 15 (Construction — fire protection, fire detection and fire extinction) 2014 applies, please refer to the AMSA instructions to class (ITC) s.4.2.1.1.

Cargo Ship Safety Radio Certificate

See Instructions to Classification Societies, paragraph 6 and Annex B of the attached file.

Refer also to Marine Order 27 for GMDSS requirements (see attached file)

Passenger Ship Safety Certificate

See Instructions to Classification Societies, paragraph 8.1 of the attached file.

SOLAS codes

IGC code

See Instructions to Classification Societies, paragraph 16 of the attached file.

Refer to Marine Orders, Part 17 (Liquefied Gas Carriers and Chemical Tankers).

IBC and BCH codes

See Instructions to Classification Societies, paragraph 18 of the attached file.

Refer to Marine Orders, Part 17 (Liquefied Gas Carriers and Chemical Tankers).

Certificate of Compliance with International Maritime Solid Bulk Cargoes Code

Recognised Organisation (RO) may issue a certificate of compliance with the IMSBC code.

It is not an AMSA requirement for a ship to have such a certificate.

Vessels intended to carry goods classified as dangerous goods in solid form in bulk, as classified in accordance with SOLAS VII/7 must be issued with a Document of Compliance, as applicable to the age and size of the ship, in accordance with SOLAS II-2/19 or preceding regulations.

(Minutes of Meeting between AMSA and ROs dated 29 and 30 May 2013)

As per Annex 1 to Schedule 1 (see Appendix 1 to the Agreement), Recognised Organisation (RO) has a limited authorisation (recommendations to AMSA on a case by case basis) related to the survey for and issue of Certificate of Compliance with respect to being a specially constructed and fitted ship for the carriage of cargoes that may liquefy as detailed in provision 7.3.2 of IMSBC Code.

Indeed, without the Administration, approval for being a specially designed and constructed ship loading of a cargo with a moisture content in excess of its Transportable Moisture Limit (TML) is simply prohibited.However, if an owner of an Australian vessel requests a Statement of compliance with the IMSBC Code for his vessel (other than the “specially designed and constructed vessel” in accordance with 7.3.2 of the Code) AMSA would not object to Recognised Organisation (RO) issuing such a document on the basis that it would not be issued on behalf of Australia.

Others

See Instructions to Classification Societies, paragraphs 8.5 to 8.11 and 13 to 15 of the attached file, respectively for:

1. HSC

2. Document of Compliance for ships carrying dangerous goods

3. Document of Authorization for the carriage of grain

4. Enhanced surveys of bulk carriers

5. Cargo Securing Manuals

6. Damage stability for passenger and cargo ships and offshore supply vessels

7. Dynamically supported craft

8. MODU

9. Special Purpose Ships.

POLAR Code

Recognised Organisation (RO) is authorized to carry out survey for the issue or endorsement of certification in accordance with the International Code for Ships Operating in Polar Waters (Polar Code) implemented by Chapter XIV Reg. 3 (F).

IP Code

Refer to Marine Order 55.

MARPOL 73/78

Annex I. IOPP certificate

General

See Instructions to Classification Societies, paragraphs 12.1 to 12.8 of the attached file.

Measures for oil tankers of less then 150 tons and all other ships of less than 400 tons are displayed in paragraph 12.1 of the Instructions to Classification Societies (see Instructions to Classification Societies).

Oil filtering equipment

Waiver for IOPP certificate

For ship/oil tanker less than 24 metres in tonnage length, a “Statement” or International Oil Pollution Prevention (IOPP) certificate is not required.

Application of waivers allowed under Regulation 3 of Annex I with respect to oil filtering equipment required under Regulation 14.5:

1. For vessels less than 400 GT

   Recognised Organisation (RO) must review a risk assessment that is prepared by the Owner/Vessel Manager and submitted to them taking into account:

   1. the vessel being fitted with a holding tank having a volume adequate for the proposed operations indicated;

   2. that all oily bilge water is retained on board for subsequent discharge to reception facilities;

   3. to ensure that adequate reception facilities are available to receive such oily bilge water in a sufficient number of ports or terminals the vessel calls at;

   4. the “Statement of Compliance” or International Oil Pollution Prevention Certificate (if requested by the owner as per Instructions to Class), when required, is endorsed to the effect that the vessel is exclusively engaged on voyages within “special areas”*; and

   5. the quantity, time, and port of discharge are recorded in the “Oil Record Book Part I” or equivalent document held on board.

   Recognised Organisation (RO) need not submit the risk assessment to AMSA, but:

   1. Must keep details of the risk assessment on file (the choice of media used is to Recognised Organisation (RO) discretion),

   2. Ensure that an appropriate entry is made in the memoranda held in respect of the Recognised Organisation (RO) record for the vessel,

   3. Be able to provide access to the risk assessment on request (e.g. for audit purposes), and

   4. Advise AMSA when such a risk assessment is undertaken on a vessel for information / record purposes.

   For further information, refer to the letter from the Administration dated 27 July 2016 and referenced 2010/893 OT16-12-Rev.1, in the attached file “LetterIOPP_27072016”.

2. For vessels of 400 GT and above

   Details of the information required to be considered in Annex I Regulation 14.5.3 and in “8 Conditions of Waiver” are to be submitted by the operator to Recognised Organisation (RO).

   When reviewing the submitted information for the vessel the details provided by the operator should also include consideration of:

   1. Relocation voyages to potential different ports, and

   2. Availability of dry-dock facilities (voyage duration / overseas, etc.) for the vessel in an emergency or for intermediate / renewal survey requirements,

   Following the review, Recognised Organisation (RO) is to advise AMSA of:

   a) the vessel details,

   b) port(s) / area(s) of operation,

   c) Recognised Organisation (RO) recommendation as to whether or not the waiver be favourably considered - and if any further conditions may be required.

   AMSA will then confirm / advise.

   For further information, refer to the letter from the Administration dated 23 June 2015 and referenced 2010/893, in the attached file “LetterIOPP”.

Refer also to Waiver of oil filtering equipment.

Testing and inspection of oil filtering equipment (MEPC.107(49))

(Marine Notice 2025/06)

This marine notice contains the interpretation from the Administration for the installation and testing of oil filtering equipment (oily water separators) installed on ships.

SOPEP / SMPEP - Approval

As from September 2001, the Administration is no longer in charge of the approval of SOPEP. This is then conducted by the Society. The same also applies to the Shipboard Marine Pollution Emergency Plan (SMPEP) for Noxious Liquid Substances required as from 1 January 2003.

Provision 2 of Appendix 1 to the Agreement (see Appendix 1 to the Agreement) relating to MARPOL 73/78 has been accordingly amended.

STS operations plans

(Administration email 2018/9523 dated 07/01/2026)

Recognised Organisation (RO) when receiving requests from Australian vessel operators for the approval of STS plans using the OCIMF “Ship to Ship Transfer Guide for Petroleum, Chemicals and Liquefied Gases (2nd Edition)” published in 2025, must be cognisant of and ensure that in doing so, the STS Plan as complies with the requirements of Marine Order 91 (Marine pollution prevention — oil) 2025 Div.6, s.26 notably s.26 (2) and s.30 notably s.30 (g)., i.e., that MARPOL Annex I Regulation 41 as currently worded is complied with.

Annex II. NLS certificate

Refer to Marine Orders, Part 93.

Annex IV. ISPP certificate

Regulations for the Prevention of Pollution by Sewage from Ships

Refer to Marine Orders, Part 96.

Annex V

Regulations for the Prevention of Pollution by Garbage from Ships

Annex VI. IAPP, EIAPP and IEE certificates

Recognised Organisation (RO) has been granted the authorization to perform the following survey and inspection:

1. Survey for issue or endorsement of the IAPP certificate

2. Survey for issue or endorsement of the EIAPP certificate

3. Survey for issue or endorsement of the national Australian Air Pollution Prevention certificate for vessels falling outside the scope of the Annex VI but subjected to air pollution requirements by the Australian Law.

Refer to Marine Orders, Part 97.

IEE

(Email from the Administration dated 04/10/2013)

In accordance with paragraph 2.3.1 of Annex 1 to schedule 1 of the RO agreement (page 20 of the attached file in Appendix 1 to the Agreement), Recognised Organisation (RO) is authorised to issue International Energy Efficiency (IEE) Certificate to Australian registered ships in accordance with the Marine Order 97 (Marine pollution prevention — air pollution) 2013, which is in the attached file “MO97-1”.

(Minutes of Meeting between AMSA and ROs dated 29 and 30 May 2013)

As provided in MARPOL Annex VI concerning the Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP), verification will take place at the first intermediate or renewal survey after 1^st January 2013.

Domestic Commercial Vessels (DCVs) <35 metres but > 400GT

(Minutes of Meeting between AMSA and ROs dated 29 and 30 May 2013)

Operators of vessels that are less than 35 metres in length and not maintained in Class may apply under Section 131(1) of the Navigation Act for a pollution certificate.

In this regard Recognised Organisation (RO) may issue a suitably worded statement of compliance under Recognised Organisation (RO)’s own terms and conditions.

Data Collection System for fuel oil consumption of ships

(Administration email Ref: 2010/893 dated 12/04/2018)

Following authorization is provided to Recognised Organisation (RO):

• Authorisation in respect to the functions related to sub-regulations 5.4.5 of MARPOL Annex VI: Reviewing of SEEMP Part II and issuance of Confirmation of Compliance

• Verification of the data for fuel consumption according to the methodology specified in Reg.22A of MARPOL Annex VI taking into account guidelines developed by the IMO.

• Survey for the issuance or endorsement of Statement of Compliance for Fuel oil consumption reporting (Reg. 6.6 and 6.7 of MARPOL Annex VI) (MO 97)

AMSA will provide appropriate templates for the “Confirmation of Compliance” and “Statement of Compliance” required by sub-regulations 5.4.5 and 6.6 and 6.7 of Annex VI respectively. These documents will be implemented into “Certificate Editor” when received.

Sulphur Oxides (Annex VI Reg.14)

(Instructions to classification societies §21, see Instructions to Classification Societies)

1. Equivalent means of compliance

   Regulation 4 of Annex VI to MARPOL allows the use of an alternative compliance method at least as effective in terms of emission reductions as that required by MARPOL Annex VI. This is the mechanism that will allow EGCS to be used once the EGCS itself has been tested and certified.

   Recognised Organisation (RO) is authorised: • to approve material and equipment; • to carry out survey and inspection in accordance with MARPOL, and survey for endorsement of an International Air Pollution Prevention Certificate.

   The Administration is responsible for approval of equivalent means of compliance in the first instance (subsequent approvals can then be issued by recognised organisations). An application for an Equivalent Means of Compliance is to be made using the standard process for approval by the Administration. All relevant documentation should be provided.

2. Sampling of discharge water from Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems

   Proposed amendments to section 10.1.5.2 of the Guidelines for exhaust gas cleaning systems will require a sample of discharge water from each EGCS to be drawn and analysed for nitrate content within the first three months of operation after installation/initial survey and three months prior to each renewal survey.

   Recognised Organisation (RO) shall be aware that:• once a survey is completed after installation of the EGCS an IAPP Certificate will be issued;• where there is no data on board the vessel of the wash water analysis (nitrate discharge rate assessment), then Recognised Organisation (RO) will be required to issue a Short Term IAPP (for 5 months) to allow enough time for the data to be prepared and checked and placed on board. On completion a full term certificate may be issued;• Recognised Organisation (RO) is to ensure that a sample of discharge water from each EGCS is taken and analysed for nitrate content, by the ship, within the first three months of operation, and provided to the RO. Once the sample has been assessed as compliant, the full term IAPP can be issued; and• a sample of discharge water from each EGCS is to be drawn and analysed for nitrate content, by the ship, and provided to Recognised Organisation (RO) three months prior to each renewal survey. If this sample is not provided the Administration shall be advised.

EEXI and CII

(Administration email dated 17/01/2022)

The EEXI and CII requirements of Annex VI Chapter IV will apply to existing regulated Australian vessels of 400 gross tonnage and above and 5,000 gross tonnage and above, respectively.The implementation into Australian legislation will include foreign flagged ships operating domestically in Australian waters. AMSA would encourage Australia vessels operating solely with the Australian EEZ (i.e. DCV’s) to comply with the provisions of Annex VI Chapter IV as applicable under the chapter. If these vessels (DCV’s) were to undertake an overseas voyage at any stage the vessel will be captured by the requirements of Chapter IV and Regulation 19.

There is currently no power under the Navigation Act 2012 or MARPOL Annex VI to exempt or waive a vessel undertaking an overseas (international voyage) from the requirements of Chapter IV Reg 25 and 28.

(Refer to Authorization letter in attached file “Services relating to Res.MEPC328” and Administration email dated 06/01/2023)

1. Review of the EEXI technical file – Regulations 23 and 25 MARPOL Annex VI, as amended

2. Verification of the SEEMP Part III – Regulation 26.3.1 MARPOL Annex VI, as amended

3. Verification of speed-power curve, required EEDI as applicable

4. Verification of the Onboard Management Manual in case an Overridable Power Limitation System is fitted, as amended

5. Verification of the attained operational annual Carbon Intensity Indicator – Regulation 28 MARPOL Annex VI, as amended

6. Issuance of Confirmation of Compliance - Regulation 5.4.6 MARPOL Annex VI, as amended

7. Issuance of Statement of Compliance combined for DCS and CII – MARPOL Annex VI, Regulation 6.6 as amended

Vessels in class with another RO

With regards to vessels who’s class and statutory certificates have been issued by another RO, AMSA would kindly seek mutual agreement between its RO’s to undertake the activities mentioned in the Authorization letter “Services relating to Res.MEPC328” and ensure there is a clear exchange of information between the RO’s where these activities are performed for such vessels.

Non-classed vessels

For vessels that are not classed with an AMSA appointed RO, AMSA may consider that the activities mentioned in the Authorization letter “Services relating to Res.MEPC328”, to be carried out under a “Non-Classed Vessel Supplement to the agreement governing the provision of statutory survey and certification services for vessels registered in Australia” on a case by case basis (See attached file “Class Agreement non-class supplement - Generic” for reference).

Non-propelled barge

(Minutes of Meeting between AMSA and ROs dated 29 and 30 May 2013)

If oil is used on board a non-propelled barge then MARPOL will apply.

DCVs (Domestic Commercial Vessels)

(AMSA RO meeting dated 15/10/2014 and email from the Administration dated 09/01/2015)

A DCV must comply with MARPOL and be issued with MARPOL certification, but this does not make it a RAV.

On request by owners of DCVs (Domestic Commercial Vessels), Recognised Organisation (RO) may approve the relevant system plans, documents and information, inspect, test and on completion issue relevant MARPOL certificates (not statement of compliances) as required, since the 2012 Navigation Act specifically allows this.

Non classed DCV

Refer to the procedure for issuance of MARPOL Statement of Compliance for a non classed Australian DCV under the Marine Safety (DCV) National Law 2012 in the attached file “NonClassedDCV”.

The request for intervention is in the attached file “RequestForIntervention”.

Other

Approval of Electronic Record Books

(Instructions to Classification Societies §12.20, see Instructions to Classification Societies)

The Administration authorize Recognised Organisation (RO) to carry out assessment and issue documentation related to approval of Electronic Record Books (ERB) in accordance with MEPC.312(74), for the following books:

• Oil Record Book, parts I and II (MARPOL Annex I, regulations 17.1 and 36.1);

• Cargo Record Book (MARPOL Annex II, regulation 15.1);

• Garbage Record Book, parts I and II (MARPOL Annex V, regulation 10.3)

• Ozone-depleting Substances Record Book (MARPOL Annex VI, regulation 12.6)

• Recording of the tier and on/off status of marine diesel engines (MARPOL Annex VI, regulation 13.5.3)

• Record of Fuel Oil Changeover (MARPOL Annex VI, regulation 14.6); and

• Record Book of Engine Parameters (NOX Technical Code, paragraph 6.2.2.7.1)

After successful review and assessment, Recognised Organisation (RO) needs to approach the Administration for the authorization to issue the declaration on behalf of the Administration.

BWM Convention

BWM Instructions to Class

The Administration (Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment) has published a “Guidance for Survey and Certification to Comply with the Requirements of the “Biosecurity Act 2015”. Refer to the attached file “Instructions to class V2 - Post Convention.pdf”.

BWM Certification

Recognised Organisation (RO) is authorized to issue an International BWM Certificate from 8th September 2017.

BWM Application

(E-mail from Administration dated 23/06/2017)

Ship types which require a certificate and plan under the convention, will also require a certificate and plan if they are operating solely in Australian waters.

However exemptions may be provided for ships operating solely in Australian waters (domestic operators).

Domestically operating ships under 400gt which utilise ballast water, will be required to have a plan but are eligible for an exemption from the requirement to obtain a certificate.

Refer also to §10 of the attached file “Instructions to class V2 - Post Convention.pdf”.

BWM Plan approval

From 8th September 2017, date of entry into force of the BWM Convention for Australia, the process for approval of a BWM Plan dated from 8th September 2017 is that only Recognised Organisation (RO) approval is required, in accordance with the BWM Convention and BioSecurity Act, on behalf of the Director of BioSecurity.

To comply with the requirements of the Biosecurity Act, a BWMP must include the mandatory provisions for a BWMP prescribed by IMO resolution MEPC.127(53) “The Guidelines for Ballast Water Management and Development of Ballast Water Management Plans (G4)”.

Potable water

For vessels operating solely under Australia’s jurisdiction and the high seas, potable water is considered an acceptable primary method of ballast water management. Vessels using potable water do not require an exemption from the need to meet Regulation D-2 of the Convention when operating in Australian waters.

When issuing a certificate to a vessel using potable water, there is no need to specify the method as meeting the D-1 or D-2 standard on the certificate. In this case, Recognised Organisation (RO) shall specify potable water in the ‘Method of ballast water management used’ section of the certificate.

Australia may be requested by another vessels administration to survey and certify a vessel flagged to that administration. Recognised Organisation (RO) can only survey and certify a foreign flagged vessel under the Biosecurity Act when requested to do so by the department.

Regarding arrangements for potable water you may refer to the “Australian Ballast Water Management Requirements” in attached files.

Commissioning testing of BWM systems

(Dept. of Agriculture - Shipping Circular 01 of 2019)

The commissioning test shall be carried out for BWMS that are installed on board applicable Australian Flagged Ships of 400GT and above after 8 September 2019. Applicable ships of less than 400GT may undergo the commissioning test voluntarily.

The commissioning test shall be carried out to the satisfaction of the attending Recognised Organisation (RO) surveyor after a complete installation of the BWMS, and after all ballasting equipment (e.g. pumps and piping) has been fully tested as appropriate.

A written report including methods and detailed results of the commissioning testing should be provided to the attending Recognised Organisation (RO) surveyor for verification before an IBWMC can be issued. The report shall be provided to the Australian Department of Agriculture (Agriculture) for information.

The testing facility engaged to conduct the commissioning test shall be independent of the manufacturer of the BWMS and accepted by the RO which issues the IBWMC.

If the commissioning test cannot be successfully carried out due to the equipment’s system design limitation, a short term IBWMC may be issued for a period of not more than three (3) months.

For further information, refer to attached file “Circular for BWMS commissioning_Nov19.pdf”.

Contingency measures

(Dept. of Agriculture - Shipping Circular 01 of 2022)

Ship-specific contingency measures, including the use of ballast water exchange where applicable, are required to be incorporated into the Ballast Water Management Plan (BWMP) of Australian and foreign flagged ships, and be approved by the relevant Recognised Organisation. The ship specific contingency measures can be approved as an appendix or an addendum to the BWMP. The complete BWMP need not be re-approved.

The contingency measures developed shall consider IMO BWM.2/Circ.62 on “Guidance on contingency measures under the BWM Convention”. Ship owners should include as many practical and safe contingency measures in the BWMP as possible, such that the Master can be guided accordingly in the event of a BWMS failure.

De-coupling of IOPP certificate

The Administration doesn’t support de-coupling of the IOPP certificate from harmonised survey in regards to the implementation of the BWM Convention.

AFS convention

International Anti-Fouling System certificate

To be in accordance with Marine Orders Part 98 (Marine Pollution – Anti-fouling Systems).

No requirements beyond IMO / IACS requirements.

Pleasure craft > 400 GRT

Pleasure craft > 400 GRT are to be issued with an International Anti-Fouling System certificate.

Vessels of 24 metres or more in length but less than 400 gross tons

The Convention also includes a requirement for vessels of 24 metres or more in length but less than 400 gross tons, to carry a “Declaration of Anti-fouling System” in the format set out in the Convention.

Pleasure craft meeting the above criteria are to be issued with a “Declaration of Anti-fouling System” in the format set out in the Convention.

DCVs (Domestic Commercial Vessels)

(AMSA RO meeting dated 15/10/2014)

Recognised Organisation (RO) can issue Antifouling certificates to DCVs (Domestic Commercial Vessels) as the 2012 Navigation Act specifically allows this.

Tonnage 69

General

See Instructions to Classification Societies, paragraphs 18 of the attached file.

Refer also to Issue of Australian Statutory Certification prior to Australian registration.

International Tonnage Certificate

International Convention on Tonnage Measurement is to be interpreted in accordance with TM5/Circ.6.

Certification for Panama and Suez Canal Tonnages

Refer to Marine Order 19 (Tonnage Measurement) 2014.

Recognised Organisation (RO) is fully authorised for the measurement, calculation and issue of the necessary certification of Panama and Suez Canal Tonnages, if requested, to Australian flag ships.

AMSA will capture this requirement in the next review of MO19.

For further information, refer to the letter from the Administration dated 12 February 2015 and referenced 2010/893, in the attached file “LetterTonnage”.

Non-classed vessels

(Minutes of Meeting between AMSA and ROs dated 29 and 30 May 2013)

Recognised Organisation (RO) can issue tonnage certificate to non-classed vessels.

COLREG 72

Untitled

New ships are to be in compliance with Marine Orders Part 30 and SOLAS Regulation V/22.

Determination (Exemption)

The Administration will no longer issue exemptions for COLREG requirements but will now be issuing a “determination” instead (see National Certificate “Determination - COLREG” in List of National certificates).

ILO conventions

Accommodation for crew

See Instructions to Classification Societies, paragraph 22 of the attached file.

Untitled

Location and general arrangement of crew accommodation is to be generally in accordance with Marine Order MO 11 (Living and working conditions on vessels). Refer to ITC para.2.7.5.

Untitled

For new ships, the examination of proposed location and general arrangement of crew accommodation and subsequent inspection may be delegated on a case by case basis.

Enquiries in relation to this matter are to be directed, in the first instance, to: Manager Ship Inspection and Registration Maritime Operations Division Australian Maritime Safety Authority Canberra ACT 2601 Tel: +61 2 6279 5048 Fax: +61 2 6279 5058 Email: FSC@amsa.gov.au

Untitled

For ships transferring to Australian flag, the general arrangement of crew accommodation is to be inspected during surveys at the time of change of flag.

This should be carried out in consultation with the Manager Ship Operations and Qualifications.

Cargo handling equipment

Refer to Marine Orders, Part 32 (Cargo handling equipment).

(Email from Recognised Organisation (RO) Australia dated 16/12/2013)

Marine Order Part 32 does apply to visiting vessels using their own cargo gear in Australian ports (this includes all cargo handling equipment).

MO-32 was modelled from ILO 152 with an addition that AMSA expects a competent person (ship’s personnel) carries out an inspection of materials handling equipment not exceeding a period of six months and a record is kept in the vessels cargo gear register.AMSA and local stevedores would expect the vessel would have a Recognised Organisation (RO) issued cargo gear register containing all cargo gear including loose gear. Each piece of equipment should have individual supporting Recognised Organisation (RO) certification and full traceability of Recognised Organisation (RO) stampings or makers serial numbers.All cargo gears should have up-to-date Recognised Organisation (RO) surveys completed and recorded by Recognised Organisation (RO) within the cargo gear register.

Miscellaneous Technical requirements

Non-convention ships

See Instructions to Classification Societies, paragraph 8 of the attached file.

The society is authorised to conduct surveys and certification services on board RO-classed ships registered in Australia not falling within the scope of international conventions.

The authorisation concerns the following certificates:

1. Certificate of survey as a passenger ship (USL Class 1 B/C/D/E),

2. Certificate of survey for a cargo ship (USL Class 2 A/B/C/D/E),

3. Certificate of survey for a fishing vessel (USL Class 3 A/B/C/D/E),

4. Certificate of survey appropriate to the voyage for a sailing ship,

5. Compliance with MARPOL, Annex I for ships of less than 400 tonnes and oil tankers of less than 150 tonnes.

The certificates are available in ASMS Certificates Editor.

Following Administration’s internal review and in view of the amendments introduced under MSC.532(107), the Australian National (Non-SOLAS) Certificates and Records of Equipment have been updated (refer to above a), b) and c)). Consequently, all applicable certificates are to be amended at the earliest opportunity, but no later than the first renewal survey on or after 1 January 2026.

Procedures for the survey, endorsement and issuance of these certificates are internal to Recognised Organisation (RO) Australia.

In circumstances where non convention vessel requirements are outside the scope of RO Common Agreement, under clause 4.2 of the agreement, Recognised Organisation (RO) is to seek advice from the AMSA Manager Ship Inspection and Registration.

Approvals may be granted on a case by case basis.

For requirements related to non-SOLAS vessels transferring to AMSA survey, refer to paragraph 9 of the attached file in Instructions to Classification Societies.

AMSA USL Classes 2 & 3A, non-SOLAS vessels - Certificate of equivalence

The Administration accepts the use of SOLAS Chapter II-2 Regulation 9 2.3.3 (Table 9.5 - Fire integrity of bulkheads separating adjacent spaces) and (Table 9.6 - Fire integrity of decks separating adjacent space) as being equivalent to the prescribed use of the National Standards for Commercial Vessels requirements in Part C - Design and construction, Section 4 Fire safety, Subsection 3.7 Structural fire protection, Tables 7, 8 and 9 for AMSA USL Classes 2 & 3A vessels in respect of the maintenance of fire integrity of bulkheads and decks.

See the attached file “CertificateOfEquivalenceEQ15_02”.

Small government vessels

(Minutes of Meeting between AMSA and ROs dated 29 and 30 May 2013)

Small government vessels will be regulated under the Marine Safety (Domestic Commercial Vessel) National Law Act 2012.

Equipment approval and acceptance

General

Where material or equipment:

1. is of a novel nature;

2. has been subject to significant design changes;

3. specifications or testing requirements are not fully developed and / or internationally agreed;

4. does not meet an appropriate IMO / ISO / IEC / ITU / European Council Directive 96/98/EC Standard; or

5. is being considered for acceptance under a substitution provision (such as SOLAS Chapter I Regulation 5);

Then the Manager Ship Inspection and Registration must be consulted.

Where equipment, required by Marine Orders, is to comply with Australian Standards, then equipment complying with an appropriate Standard (e.g. IMO / ISO / IEC) may be considered equivalent and acceptable but confirmation should be sought from the Manager Ship Inspection and Registration.

Acceptance of equipment with MED certificate/class certificate

The Administration will accept:

1. MED certificates for equipment issued by an IACS member (as a 'Notified Body') that is also an AMSA appointed Recognised Organisation or a flag Administration (Country) where the AMSA appointed recognised organisation is also appointed by that Administration as an RO; OR

2. MED certificates for equipment issued by a flag Administration in its capacity as a 'Notified Body' e.g. Norway, United Kingdom, Finland, Germany etc.

The Administration will NOT accept:

• MED Certificates for equipment NOT issued by one of the entities identified above.

• MED Certificate issued by an independent Third Party where the Administration has no relationship with the Third Party.

An exception may be made after submission of the relevant MED documentation to the Administration and the Administration agrees that subject to:

1. the RO reviewing the documentation, its contents and the Third Party responsible for producing it; and

2. then the RO provides to the Administration a “Statutory Declaration” to that affect accepting the Third Parties MED Certification as if it has issued itself; then

the Administration would in such a case permit the equipment to be installed on a regulated Australian vessel.

The RO is to record details of the equipment and its MED Certification on the vessel's classification record.

Noise survey report

The IMO Code “Noise levels on board ships” - Resolution A.468(XII), and the Recommendation on methods of measuring noise levels at listening posts – Resolution A.343(IX), are not mandatory IMO Instruments however AMSA requires class and vessel owners to take these documents into account.

Carriage of livestock

(MO 43 §10.5)

All ships which are carrying livestock from Australia and Australian registered ships intended to carry livestock cargoes shall obtain an Australian Certificate for the Carriage of Livestock delivered by the Administration.

To allow the issuance of this certificate by the Australian Administration beyond 1 December 2011, such vessels shall comply with the SOLAS applicable to ships constructed on or after 1 September 1984, irrespective of the date of construction (including requirement for subdivision, machinery and electrical installations, fire protection, life-saving appliances).

Vessels engaged in towing operations - Certificate of equivalence

The Administration accepts the use of International Code on Intact Stability, 2008 (2008 IS Code), IACS Recommendation 24 Rev. May 2004 and Recognised Organisation (RO) Rules for steel ships Pt D, Ch 14, Sec 2.2 as being equivalent to the prescribed use of the National Standards for Commercial Vessels requirements in Part C - Design and construction, Section 6, Subsection 6A Intact stability requirements, Clause 6.6 Vessels engaged in towing in respect of those vessels engaged in towing operations to which the Navigation Act 2012 (last compilation dated 30/08/2019) applies.

See the attached file “EQ13-113-MO12,5.2forTowingStability”.

Safe access to cargo holds

In respect to safe access to a vessel’s cargo holds covered under Marine Order 32 (2016) Schedule 2 “Access on board vessels”. Recognised Organisation (RO), upon request, are duly authorised to act on behalf of AMSA in respect of examining the hold access ladder arrangements in accordance with of Marine Order 32 (2016) Schedule 2 “Access on board vessels” and issuing a suitably worded “Statement of Compliance” or equivalent in respect of the arrangements for Australian flagged vessels.

AMSA does not provide an authorisation to examine arrangements under MO32 32 (2016) Schedule 2 “Access on board vessels” in respect of non-Australian flagged vessels as that is beyond our jurisdiction.

When requested by non-Australian flagged vessels, Recognised Organisation (RO) would therefore need to issue an appropriately worded “Statement of Compliance” or equivalent under their own terms and conditions of business.

(Email from the Administration dated 27/06/2025)

Any foreign flagged vessel must comply with the requirements of the flag Administration in which the vessel is registered in the first instance. Where an Australian requirement may conflict with the requirements of the flag Administration, it is concluded that the matter will be addressed between that flag Administration and its appointed recognised organisation (RO) for discussion/resolution and any action as required.

The Administration does not issue acceptance letters for specific types of step configurations for inclined ladders accessing cargo hold spaces. Compliance is assessed against the applicable provisions of Marine Order 32.

There was a proposal to fit galvanized steel gratings or galvanized raised perforated steel plates as an alternative to checkered plate steps, citing safety considerations. The implementation of such alternatives falls under the company’s internal safety procedures and the vessel's flag state requirements.

Under Marine Order 32, Schedule 2, Section 14(1)(c)(i), the regulation specifically requires:

“checkered steel plate with a bearing surface at least 115 mm deep and the leading edge rounded”

This requirement must be fulfilled for the following reasons:

1. Anti-Slip Surface and Construction Type: The intent is to provide an anti-slip surface, the term “checkered” can be interpreted broadly. However, the regulation explicitly refers to a “steel plate,” which implies a solid, permanently affixed construction - not a removable grating.

   Gratings, even when secured, may be vulnerable to loosening or detachment during the operational lifespan of the vessel. A checkered steel plate offers a more stable and enduring foothold, contributing to the structural integrity and long-term safety of the ladder.

2. Rounded Leading Edge Requirement: The regulation also requires the leading edge of each step to be rounded. It is important that any proposed design meets such criteria.

FPSOs and FSUs

(Emails from the Administration dated 24/09 and 01/10/2013)

AMSA requires those FPSOs and FSUs that are within its jurisdiction to meet the requirements of SOLAS for “tankers” as defined in SOLAS Chapter I and have their ship type accordingly shown as “tanker” on SOLAS certificates.

By virtue of the above, the enhanced survey program of SOLAS regulation XI-1/2 should be applied to disconnectable FPSOs and FSUs.

FPSOs and FSUs that are non-disconnectable are of course not subject to SOLAS.

AMSA has no objection to these vessels being assigned a class designation of “FPSO” or similar by Recognised Organisation (RO), the Administration main requirements in this regard being that the vessel has a current class certificate and is subjected to a good standard of surveys equivalent to enhanced survey.

(Minutes of Meeting between AMSA and ROs dated 29 and 30 May 2013)

Gap-analysis reports relating to the potential change of flag surveys undertaken for the purposes of moving to the Australian Shipping Register (General or International) for FPSOs and / or FSUs are to be provided to AMSA.

Marine Order MO 47 (Refer to ITC para.12.3.7) is related to floating offshore facilities.

For vessels that are capable of disconnection from the riser, self-propelled or non-self-propelled, but have not, undergone dry-docking for a significant period, depending upon hull coatings, there may be a need to assess the build-up of marine growth and the extent to which the external ship’s bottom, openings, appendages and fittings have been obscured.Local environmental controls in the area may not permit the removal of marine excessive growth in situ. From statutory certification aspects, if there is doubt then a report of the extent of marine growth together with a recommendation is to be sent to the Manager Ship Inspection and Registration for consideration.

FPSOs and FSUs that can sail independently and are not fitted with ECDIS will require a MO 21 exemption (Section 10.1) for “local” operation and a further SOLAS I/4 (a) exemption where the vessel is required to undertake an overseas voyage to go to dry-dock, etc.

In these cases, SOLAS Regulation V/3 does not cover it.

If the FPSO / FSU did not have an effective means of propulsion (thruster’s for position keeping as opposed to propulsion) then SOLAS Chapter V/ Regulation 3.1 may be relied upon.

In any case, AMSA would require an adequate set of paper charts and publications, which must be kept fully up to date at all times. The charts provided would be expected to cover, but may not be limited to most of the West and North West sea areas, with large-scale charts along the coast.

Where the ship is undertaking a voyage to dry dock, a full folio for the areas covered by the voyage is to be carried.

Disconnectable FPSOs and FSUs will not be permitted to rely on any electronic charts systems that do not comply with the ECDIS performance standards and / or is not loaded with ENC’s and for which corrections are also maintained.

However, operators should be aware that they must advise Recognised Organisation (RO) if a FPSO or FSU intents to sail independently without an ECDIS as this effects the statutory certificates issued by Recognised Organisation (RO) on behalf of AMSA.

Any alternative should include the scope of charts and nautical publications intended to be carried and the undertaking that charts and nautical publications will be kept up to date.

Operators of detachable self-propelled FPSOs / FSUs should also note that these are survey items to be inspected by Recognised Organisation (RO) (and AMSA if undertaking Flag State Compliance (FSC) inspections).

Landing craft

(AMSA RO meeting dated 15/10/2014)

Exemptions for MARPOL requirements when carrying large quantities of fuel onboard as well as for load line bow height (Bridge visibility issues) are needed for most landing crafts.

DCVs (Domestic Commercial Vessels) VS RAVs (Regulated Australian Vessels)

(AMSA RO meeting dated 15/10/2014)

Vessel’s can not be DCV and RAV at the same time (holding dual certificates). If a vessel has on board safety / Load Line certification issued by AMSA / RO, it is a RAV and not a DCV.

There is no issue with a DCV being issued with an RO “Statements of Compliance” under the ROs own terms and conditions at the request of the owner. Such documents do not make the DCV a RAV.

DCV contact and useful links

(Administration email dated 06/04/2020)

For domestic vessel related enquiries please contact dcvsurvey@amsa.gov.au; or if related to a particular vessel application then use dcvapplications@amsa.gov.au.

For domestic vessels, the statutory survey requirements are set out in the Surveyor Manual and Marine Order 503: https://www.amsa.gov.au/vessels-operators/domestic-commercial-vessels/marine-surveyors-manual-parts-1-and-2

For domestic vessels, AMSA approval is not required to postpone class survey items, this can be done in accordance with class rules including for bottom surveys. However if statutory surveys cannot be completed, or equipment (LSA/FFE) cannot be serviced within timeframes then the owner can obtain temporary permits under Exemption 06 or Exemption 07. https://www.amsa.gov.au/forms/application-operate-beyond-survey-due-date-or-equipment-due-date https://www.amsa.gov.au/forms/exemption-application-temporary-operations

Note: for DCVs in LOW or MEDIUM survey frequency category (Surveyor manual Tables 7&8) which includes most tugs/workboats, the year 3 statutory survey does not include a bottom survey. Consequently the intermediate bottom survey is a class requirement only and can be postponed according to class rules.

Passenger vessels are in HIGH survey frequency category.

Domestic Commercial Vessel Periodical Surveys

Marine Order 508 (National law amendment) 2016, amended the Marine Safety (Domestic Commercial Vessel) National Law to enable recognised organisations including Recognised Organisation (RO) to carry out statutory surveys on DCVs.

For Recognised Organisation (RO) classed vessels, at the request of the vessels owners/managers Recognised Organisation (RO) Surveyors can carry out periodical surveys on DCVs for issuance of a Statement of Compliance for Survey of a Domestic Commercial Vessel. Additionally Recognised Organisation (RO) Surveyors are permitted under the National Law to endorse the vessel’s existing Certificate of Survey upon completion of the periodical survey.

Prior to the survey being carried out the vessel’s Fire and Safety plan should be checked for compliance with the requirements of the National Standard for Commercial Vessels (NSCV). The plan is to be checked by the Recognised Organisation (RO) Australia (Recognised Organisation (RO) Senior Surveyor) and if found in compliance with NSCV requirements stamped with Recognised Organisation (RO) round stamp and wording "fire and safety equipment noted for DCV Class ##".

Items to be surveyed during annual periodical surveys are given in the National Standard for the Administration of Marine Safety (NSAMS) Section 4 - Survey of Vessels.

www.amsa.gov.au/forms-and-publications/domestic/publications/documents/NSAMS_Section_4.pdf

Annex E in the above standard gives the items subject to survey and Table E.1 can be used as the main reference/checklist for survey of level 1 vessels.

A level 1 vessel is a vessel subject to full initial and periodic surveys and applies to all Class 2A vessels as well Class 2B and 2C greater than 7.5m.

The following survey codes are available in ASMS for DCV periodical surveys:

• DCVA – Australian Domestic Commercial Vessel Annual Survey

• DCVR - Australian Domestic Commercial Vessel Renewal Survey (also to be used for initial survey)

• DCVO - Australian Domestic Commercial Vessel Occasional Survey

Residual Current Devices:

A residual current device (RCD) is an electrical safety device. It is designed to immediately switch off the power when electricity is ‘leaking’ to earth at a level that is harmful to a person. RCDs are designed to operate within 10 to 50 milliseconds. RCDs are required to be fitted on DCVs under state/territory workplace health and safety legislation. RCDs have to be tested every 12 months to make sure they stop the electrical current when triggered. In addition, Portable RCDs must undergo a push-button test at least every three months and fixed RCDs every six months. Twelve-monthly inspections and testing of RCDs must be done by a competent person in electrical in-service inspection and testing.

A record of testing (other than daily testing) must be kept until the device is next tested or disposed of. Testing records for RCD's need to be checked by attending Surveyors during periodical surveys on DCV's.

RCDs only work in an electrical system that uses a Multiple Earth Neutral. If the vessel uses an Isolated Earthing system an RCD won’t work. These systems should have earth monitoring equipment, i.e insulation meters, earth lamps/alarms, which are to be checked during annual surveys.

Refer to attached file "Working Boats, March 2017" pages 20-22 for additional information.

Radio Communications:

During DCV periodical surveys a crew member holding a radio operators certificate of proficiency shall carry out a radio test call on one of the distress frequencies in the presence of the Surveyor. HF radio test calls shall be made to RCC Australia (when vessel is located in Australia). VHF test calls shall be made to the Limited Coast Station (LCS) in that area. The station called, time and date, as well as the signal strength and modulation (e.g 5/5) as stated by RCC or the LCS shall be recorded.

Where a DCV is only fitted with a VHF radio and no HF radio or satellite system the following wording is to be endorsed on the Statement of Compliance for DCV under item 5. "The following limitations on areas of operation apply: Within specified waters designated by the Authority as being Limited Coast Station areas of coverage".

Upon completion of the survey if there are no deficiencies Recognised Organisation (RO) Surveyors are authorised to sign the vessels Certificate of Survey if the vessel already holds a Certificate of Survey issued by AMSA or one of the state marine agencies (until July 2018). Certificates of Survey are valid for 5 years.

Additionally Recognised Organisation (RO) Surveyors are to issue or endorse the Recognised Organisation (RO) Statement of Compliance for Survey of a Domestic Commercial Vessel and Record of Equipment, available in Certificate Editor. The Statement of Compliance should be aligned with the expiry date of the vessels Class Certificate.

Vessels changing from RAV (Regulated Australian Vessel) to DCV (Domestic Commercial Vessel) and vice-versa

When a vessel changes from AMSA DCV to RAV or RAV to DCV, a notes/ memoranda is to be endorsed on the Classification Certificate with the text "Vessel changed from Australian Domestic Commercial Vessel to Regulated Australian Vessel" or "Vessel changed from Regulated Australian Vessel to Australian Domestic Commercial Vessel". Any similar memoranda endorsed during previous change over need to be cancelled as well.

When a vessel changes from AMSA DCV to RAV or RAV to DCV, any exemptions issued under the National Law (for DCVs) or Navigation Act (for RAVs) will need to be requested from AMSA to be assessed and re-issued under the correct Law for the new operation (RAV or DCV). Previous exemption certificates issued by Recognised Organisation (RO) on behalf of AMSA for a RAV are to be removed from the vessel when changing to a DCV.

When changing from RAV to DCV the SOLAS safety certificates or Certificate of Survey as well as the loadline certificate and MLC certificate shall be withdrawn from the vessel. A loadline statement of compliance and MLC Voluntary Statement of Compliance may be issued if requested by the client. MARPOL and antifoul certificates may remain onboard. Documents of Compliance for vessels carrying Dangerous Goods can remain onboard.

When changing from DCV to RAV the DCV Statement of Compliance shall be withdrawn from the vessel.

Upon changing status from RAV to DCV or DCV to RAV, a notification email must be sent to the Marine Operational Centre to withdraw RAV certificates (Safety and Loadline) or DCV Statement of Compliance and then update Neptune/ VeriSTAR. A notification email shall also be sent to AMSA FSC, fsc@amsa.gov.au advising that the vessel has changed from RAV to DCV or vice versa.

Yachts

(AMSA RO meeting dated 15/10/2014)

Yachts carrying over 12 passengers are considered to be passenger vessels and will be treated accordingly under SOLAS.

LY3 will be applied to new vessels

A vessel leaving Australia is obliged to be registered. Under Section 13 of the Shipping Registration Act vessels that operate within Australian waters and less than 24 meters are exempted. These vessels don’t need to be registered, but must be registered if sailing to or from an overseas port.

Australian National Annex to LY3

(AMSA email dated 31/08/2016)

The “Australian National Annex” modifies for Australia the requirements of ‘Large Commercial Yacht Code’ – third edition (known as the LY3 Code).

Marine Order 52 (Yachts and training vessels) 2016 (MO52) made under the Navigation Act 2012, establishes the requirements for regulated Australian vessels (RAVs) that are large yachts.

The LY3 Code is to be read in conjunction with this Annex for the purposes of MO52 and the Certificate of Compliance (Large Yacht).

It is recommended that where applicable, Australian recreational vessels comply with LY3 Code as modified by this Australian National Annex

For further details, refer to attached file “aust-nat-annex-to-the-lrg-commercial-yacht-codeLY3.pdf”

Ship Recycling and IHM

(Administration email dated 15/12/2020)

All Australian flagged ships calling at an EU port or anchorage shall have an Inventory of Hazardous Materials Statement of Compliance (not issued on behalf of the flag).

The letter “To whom it may concern”, in attached file “Template letter of endorsement IHMSoC.pdf”, shall be attached to the IHM SOC (The fields for the date, ship name and recognised organisation details are editable in the form.).

Recognised Organisation (RO) is to maintain a record of the IHM SOC issued, reporting such to the Administration during quarterly reporting.

(AMSA RO meeting dated 23 September 2024)

Australia has not ratified the Hong Kong convention.

Tenders or work boats embarked on RAVs

(Refer to ITC in Instructions to Classification Societies)

Tenders embarked on cargo ships

Where a tender or work boat is embarked on a RAV and is provided for use of the vessel (mother ship), its operation, maintenance and deployment will fall under the vessels safety management (SMS) system. As such survey and certification under MO31 is not required.

Tenders to parent passenger vessels

A tender to a RAV is considered part of the ship’s equipment. As ships equipment, the tender is included as part of the ship itself, and its safe operation is included in the safety management system of the parent passenger vessel. The safe management and operation are subject to both flag State inspection as a RAV, and port State control inspection when operating in another Coastal States waters.

Certification of tenders as RAV’s for the purposes of excursions

An Australian vessel used in connection with a commercial, governmental or research activity will be a RAV if:

• it is proceeding on an overseas voyage or is for use on an overseas voyage, or

• a certificate issued under the Nav Act, other than a non-Convention tonnage certificate or a certificate prescribed by the regulations, is in force for the vessel.

• an opt in declaration is in force for the vessel.

ISM Code

Authorizations & Instructions

Authorization will commence with full effect from 1 JULY 2020.

Specific Requirements

Cyber Security

IMO Resolution MSC.428 (98) recommends that the operator’s SMS cover cyber risks no later than the first verification of the DOC. From 1 January 2021, Recognised Organisation (RO) will need to ensure that operators comply.

Recognised Organisation (RO) must ensure that the safety management system covers all functional elements, as outlined in MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3: - Identify - Protect - Detect - Respond - Recover.

Self-discharger ships

(Administration email dated 03/02/2021)

ISM code sections 1.2.2.3 and 1.2.3.2 are very important in order to review, learn and take any applicable action from industry incidents. These items should always be part of the shipboard audit review of the dynamic elements, in particular the Master’s annual review, Master’s verification and the effective conducting of shipboard training and drills. As such the numerous self-discharger fire incidents and findings, as well as any other serious incidents, should be considered by the manager/Master and form part of their management system reviews, as applicable.Under Section 3.1.2 of the IMSBC Code, a fire risk assessment shall be carried out by the ship’s crew on cargo handling areas featuring internally installed conveyor systems within the structure of the ship. The fire safety risk assessments shall be detailed in the safety management system, together with regular assessments.Instructions and procedures for the safe operation of conveyor belts, including instructions on what to do in an emergency, are to be included in the safety management system, and that crew are to be familiar with the operation of conveyor systems.

MLC, 2006

Scope of Authorisation

Specific Flag Requirements

Instructions concerning Maritime Labour Convention 2006 are detailed in Section 13 of the “Instructions To Classification Societies” (see Instructions to Classification Societies).

Extracts from ITC, Section 13 MLC 2006

Interim inspection and certification

An Interim MLC may be issued in accordance with Standard A5.1.3, section 5 to 7, of MLC 2006. A MLC certificate may be issued on an interim basis under the following circumstances:

• New vessels on delivery

• When a vessel changes flag

• When a vessel owner assumes responsibility for the operation of a vessel which is new to that vessel owner

The validity of the Interim MLC may not exceed a period of 6 months and may only be issued subject to verification that:

• the vessel has been inspected, as far as reasonable and practicable, for the 14 areas subject to general inspection in Appendix A5-I of the MLC 2006;

• the vessel owner has demonstrated that the vessel has adequate procedures in place to comply with Marine Order 11;

• the master of the vessel is familiar with the requirements of Marine Order 11; and

• the vessel owner is in process of developing a DMLC Part II and has submitted relevant information to AMSA for the development of a DMLC Part I, which may include a request for exemption or equivalent.

A full inspection in accordance with Standard A5.1.3 paragraph 1 shall be carried out prior to the expiry of the Interim MLC to enable to issue a full term MLC.

No further Interim certificate will be issued following the initial 6 month period. A DMLC Part I need not be issued for the period of validity of the interim certificate.

Initial inspection and certification

I. The process of applying for MLC, 2006 certification and the subsequent issue of the Maritime Labour Certificate should generally follow the steps below.

1. The vessel owner makes application to their selected RO for MLC inspection and certification.

2. The owner submits all relevant information to the RO for appraisal.

   1. Using the requirements in the DMLC Part I template as a guide, where exemptions or equivalents are to be sought, the vessel owner must provide evidence, including evidence of consultation with shipowner and seafarer organisations as required by the MLC, 2006.

   2. Exemptions are only permitted where specifically allowed in Title 3 of the MLC, 2006 and Marine Order 11.

3. The RO should review any requests for exemptions or equivalents to ensure they are complete and substantiated before forwarding on to AMSA.

4. The owner must also complete DMLC Part II and submit to the RO for review and endorsement.

5. MLC forms, including DMLC Parts I and II, are available at the AMSA website at www.amsa.gov.au/forms

II. The RO may then conduct a formal inspection of the vessel. The inspection will cover the 16 areas subject to general inspection, as detailed in Appendix A5-I of the MLC, 2006.

III. When the RO verifies, following inspection, that the vessel and its arrangements comply with the MLC, 2006 and Marine Order 11, the RO shall forward the application, including requests for exemptions / equivalents, the endorsed DMLC Part II and the inspection report to AMSA.

1. AMSA assesses the content of the application, including the RO-endorsed DMLC Part II, any requests for exemptions / equivalents and the inspection report.

2. If any further information or clarification is required on an exemption / equivalence request or any other documentation, AMSA will liaise with the RO who should consult the vessel owner.

   i) With regard to exemptions / equivalents, when the Manager, Ship Inspection and Registration is satisfied that the requested exemption / equivalence Is valid and the outcome of the consultation with the representative organisations is satisfactory, the RO will be informed accordingly.

The details of the exemptions / equivalents granted will be inserted in the relevant section of the DMLC Part I by AMSA. If required, the owner may need to review and resubmit the DMLC Part II to the RO.

IV. When the Manager Ship Inspection and Registration is satisfied that the DMLC Part II and the inspection report are adequate, the DMLC Part I, including any exemptions / equivalents, is finalised, signed and issued. AMSA will Issue the signed DMLC Part I in soft copy through the RO. The original DMLC Part I will be forwarded to the vessel owner.

V. The RO will issue a Maritime Labour Certificate and provide it to the vessel owner.

VI. The RO will ensure that a copy of the MLC is forwarded to AMSA.

Marine Order 11 (Living and working conditions on vessels) 2024

Below are extracts of Marine Order 11.

8. Exemptions

(1) A requirement of this Marine Order does not apply in relation to a regulated Australian vessel if AMSA, under this section, exempts the vessel from the requirement.

(2) The owner of a regulated Australian vessel may apply, in accordance with the application process mentioned in Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013, to AMSA for an exemption from a provision of this Marine Order that provides for an application for an exemption.

Note Marine Order 1 (Administration) 2013 deals with the following matters about exemptions and equivalents:

• making an application

• seeking further information about an application

• the time allowed for consideration of an application

• imposing conditions on approval of an application

• notification of a decision on an application

• review of decisions.

(3) AMSA may give an exemption only if it:

1. is satisfied that giving the exemption would not contravene the Maritime Labour Convention; and

2. has consulted in accordance with any requirements for consultation, mentioned in the Maritime Labour Convention, that apply to the exemption.

Note The issuing body will note any exemption for a vessel approved by AMSA on the vessel’s declaration of maritime labour compliance.

MLC Reg. 2.4 - Entitlement to leave

Memo to RO dated 21/10/14 (file attached).

RO has to advise shipowners and managers of AMSA's policy on the application of MLC Reg. 2.4 -Entitlement to leave

2014 Amendments to Maritime Labour Convention 2006

Extract from instructions regarding 2014 MLC Amendments

QUOTE

These amendments will automatically come into force for Australia on 18 January 2017, in accordance with Article XV of MLC, 2006.

Amendments to Marine Order 11

Amendments to Marine Order 11 (MO11) are currently in progress to incorporate new provisions to reflect the new requirements, and will be in force as at 18 January 2017.

Inspections and Certification Procedure commencing 18 January 2017

Declarations of Maritime Compliance Parts I and II and any Maritime Labour Certificate issued to a vessel in accordance with Marine Order 11 before 18 January 2017, will continue in force until the vessel’s first renewal inspection, following entry into force of the amendments, for all regulated Australian vessels (RAVs).

This will not affect the rights and obligations of seafarers and ship owners, which includes an obligation to provide financial security in accordance with MLC, 2006, as amended, from 18 January 2017.

From 18 January 2017, all RAVs shall retain on board, financial security in accordance with Regulation 2.5 - Repatriation and Regulation 4.2 – Shipowners’ liability and treatment of contractual claims of MLC, 2006, as amended. Compliance with these requirements will be verified during the first intermediate inspection or renewal inspection, whichever occurs first, carried out on or after 18 January 2017.

The Maritime Labour Certificates and Declarations of Maritime Compliance Parts I and II, issued from 18 January 2017, must reflect amendments from the first renewal inspection.

Australia’s amended DMLC Parts I and II templates are available at http://www.amsa.gov.au/forms-and-publications/international/forms/Seafarers/index.asp.

All items in DMLC Part I, including amendments shall be incorporated into the interim, initial and renewal inspections in accordance with Declarations of Maritime Compliance Parts I and II, from 18 January 2017, when the amendments enter into force.

Any questions regarding Australia’s implementation of the amendments to MLC, 2006 should be directed to fsc@amsa.gov.au.

UNQUOTE

For further information, refer to attached file “Australia Amendments to Maritime Labour Convention - Instructions to ROs”.

2022 Amendments to Maritime Labour Convention 2006

(Refer to the Instructions to Recognised Organizations in attached file “Implementation of MLC 2022 Amendments - Instructions to ROs - 10 July 2025”)

DMLC Part I issued on or after 23 December 2024 remain valid and do not require reissuance.

DMLC Part I issued before 23 December 2024 may continue to be used until the vessel’s next intermediate or renewal MLC inspection after 23 December 2024, after which an updated version will be issued upon request in accordance with section 13.3.4 of the AMSA Instructions to Classification Societies (ITC).

Recognised Organisation (RO) must:

• Verify compliance with the 2022 amendments during initial, intermediate, and renewal MLC inspections conducted after 23 December 2024.

• Ensure issuance and verification of updated DMLC II no later than the first MLC renewal or intermediate inspection following 23 December 2024.

• Report to the Administration any findings or challenges observed during implementation or certification of the amendments.

Appendix — Agreement governing the provision of statutory survey and certification services

Agreement

See the attached files:

• “Agreement_Australia-RO_01072013”.

• “Amendment_RO_Australia_01012017”.

Appendix 1 to the Agreement

Applicable instruments and degree of authorisation

See the attached file “Appendix1_Australia_RO_08062021”.

• Annex 1 to Schedule 1 applies for ships where SOLAS Convention applies.

• Annex 2 to Schedule 1 applies for ships where Conventions are not applicable in part or in full.

Appendix 2 to the Agreement

Audit arrangements

See the attached file “Appendix2_Australia_RO_12082019”.

Appendix — Instructions to Classification Societies

Untitled

Compliance with ITC is mandatory unless any deviation is approved by AMSA.

See the attached file “Instructions to Classification Societies v20” issued on April 2024.

Appendix — Waiver of oil filtering equipment

Risk assessment

Procedure for AMSA waiver as allowed under the provisions of MARPOL Annex I, Regulation 3 with respect to oil filtering equipment required under Regulation 14

AMSA waiver procedure is designed to make it easier for Recognised Organisation (RO) to make a decision for issuance of IOPP certificates on vessels without Oily Water Separator (OWS), especially for those vessels on restricted voyages (Domestic Commercial Vessels).

With reference to the IOPP waiver of Regulation 14 by Regulation 14.5.3, this waiver ability is recorded within the IOPP supplement as per below example:

Supplement to IOPP certificate

2.5. Waiver of regulation 14

[ ] 2.5.1. The requirements of regulation 14.1 and 14.2 are waived in respect of the ship in accordance with regulation 14.5.

[ ] 1. The ship is engaged exclusively on voyages within special area(s):

The following UI, contained within both Regulations 3 and 14 provides referencing criteria in respect to “restricted voyages”:Unified Interpretations

8 Conditions for waiver

Regulations 3.4, 3.5, 14.5.3The International Oil Pollution Certificate should contain sufficient information to permit the port State to determine if the vessel complies with the waiver conditions regarding the phrase “restricted voyages as determined by the Administration”.

1. For vessels <400 GRT >24m

   1. IOPP certificates are issued under the provisions of the Navigation Act 2012 and Marine Orders-91 on behalf of AMSA by Recognised Organisation (RO). Together with the Approval of Equivalence (see Approval of Equivalence - MARPOL I in List of National certificates)

   2. Application:

      Applies to all vessels >400 GRT and or <400 GRT >24m.

   3. Job surveyor to be duly qualified as per the related procedure for specific survey scope.

   4. Reporting to be made via ASMS job system utilising appropriate IOPP survey codes and be subject to SSOM validation process.

   5. Invoicing will be via ASMS and SM2 as per normal practice.

   6. Vessel IOPP systems and tanks to be subject to Recognised Organisation (RO) plan review by LPOs as per normal Recognised Organisation (RO) procedures including approval of SOPEP manual.

   7. In addition to plan review and survey for vessels <400GT, Recognised Organisation (RO) must conduct a risk assessment taking into account the following points:

      • The vessel being fitted with a holding tank having a volume adequate for the proposed operations indicated.

      • That all oily bilge water is retained on board for subsequent discharge to reception facilities.

      • To ensure that adequate reception facilities are available to receive such oily bilge water in a sufficient number of ports or terminals the vessel calls at.

      • The “Statement of Compliance” or International Oil Pollution Prevention Certificate (if requested by the owner as per Instructions to Class), when required, is endorsed to the effect that the vessel is exclusively engaged on voyages within special areas.

      • The quantity, time, and port of discharge are recorded in the Oil Record Book Part I or equivalent document held on board.

   8. The above 5 bullet points are to be sent to the owners / managers for their comments and to make a procedure addressing each AMSA item for the vessels specific operations.

      The risk assessment and mitigation form in the attached file “RiskAssessment” is to be completed by the Recognised Organisation (RO) surveyor.

   9. Surveys

      Recognised Organisation (RO) surveyor to ensure the following:

      • All bilge wells and oil save -alls suction pipes go direct to bilge holding tank and waste oil tank.

      • ER bilge and waste oil pipes have no direct overboard discharge capability. To ensure there are no blind flanges fitted.

      • Ensure bilge holding tank and waste oil tank discharge pipes go direct to international shore connection.

      • Review Oil Spill Response Plan or Procedure.

      • Inspect Oil Spill Recovery Equipment.

   10. For vessels <400GT the over view of the waiver proposal does not need to be submitted to AMSA.

       Recognised Organisation (RO) need not submit assessment to AMSA, but:

       • Must keep details of the risk assessment on file (the choice of media used is to Recognised Organisation (RO) discretion)

       • Ensure that an appropriate entry is made in the memoranda held in respect of the Recognised Organisation (RO) record for the vessel

       • Be able to provide access to the risk assessment on request (e.g. for audit purposes)

       • Advise AMSA when such a risk assessment is undertaken on a vessel for information / record purposes

2. For vessels of 400 GT and above

   Items 1. to 6. + 9 as above apply.

   Such vessels may via MARPOL Annex I Regulation 14, 3.5 and subject to the conditions therein may be waived from the requirements to comply with Regulation 14.1.

   The Unified Interpretations Clause 8 quoted above provide clarification under which AMSA should consider such a waiver.

   Details of the information required to be considered in Annex I Regulation 14.5.3 and in “8 Conditions of waiver” are to be submitted by the operator to Recognised Organisation (RO). When reviewing the submitted information for the vessel, the details provided by the operator should also include consideration of:

   1. Relocation voyages to potential different ports, and

   2. Availability of dry-dock facilities (voyage duration / overseas / etc.) for the vessel in an emergency or for intermediate / renewal survey requirements.

   Following the review, Recognised Organisation (RO) is to advise AMSA of:

   1. The vessel details

   2. Port(s) / area(s) of operation,

   3. Recognised Organisation (RO) recommendation as to whether or not the waiver be favourably considered – and if any further conditions may be required.

   For vessels >400GT the over view of the waiver proposal (points 1, 2 and 3 above) does need to be submitted to AMSA (after review by Recognised Organisation (RO)) plus also if an exemption is required outside of Regulation 14.5.

   If vessel is a N.P. dumb barge with no machinery, anchoring or mooring equipment, if >400GRT vessel must have an approved SOPEP manual, if vessel <400GRT and >24m vessel must have an approved simple format SOPEP manual or similar oil spill procedure specific to the vessels operations.

Appendix — Specific Certificates: National and bilingual International certificates.

List of National certificates

1. Safety Certificates

   - Approval of Equivalence - MARPOL I

   - Certificate of Equivalence

   - Determination - COLREG

   - Certificate of Survey for a Fishing Vessel and Record Form FF

   - Exemption to Certificate of Survey for Fishing Vessel

   - Certificate of Survey for a Cargo Ship and Record Form CC

   - Exemption to Certificate of Survey for Cargo Ship

   - Certificate of Survey for a Passenger Ship and Record Form PP

   - Exemption to Certificate of Survey for Passenger Ship

   - Passenger Certificate

   - SOC for Survey of a DCV

   - Waiver Certificate

2. MARPOL SOC for Non-classed DCV

   - IOPP Statement of Compliance and Supplement Form A

   - Sewage Statement of Compliance

   - Garbage Statement of Compliance

   - IAPP Statement of Compliance and Supplement

   - IEE Statement of Compliance and Supplement

3. MLC, 206

   - Interim, Short Term, Definitive certificates according with Section 44 of the Navigation Act 2012 and Article V and Title 5 of the Maritime Labour Convention 2006.