4 System failure mode and effects analysis
Clasification Society 2024 - Version 9.40
Statutory Documents - IMO Publications and Documents - International Codes - HSC 2000 Code - International Code of Safety for High-Speed Craft, 2000 – Resolution MSC.97(73) - Annex 4 - Procedures for failure mode and effects analysis - 4 System failure mode and effects analysis

4 System failure mode and effects analysis

  4.1 Before proceeding with a detailed FMEA into the effects of the failure of the system elements on the system functional output it is necessary to perform a functional failure analysis of the craft's important systems. In this way only systems which fail the functional failure analysis need to be investigated by a more detailed FMEA.

  4.2 When conducting a system FMEA, the following typical operational modes within the normal design environmental conditions of the craft shall be considered:

  • .1 normal seagoing conditions at full speed;

  • .2 maximum permitted operating speed in congested waters; and

  • .3 manoeuvring alongside.

  4.3 The functional interdependence of these systems shall also be described in either block diagrams or fault-tree diagrams or in a narrative format to enable the failure effects to be understood. As far as applicable, each of the systems to be analysed is assumed to fail in the following failure modes:

  • .1 complete loss of function;

  • .2 rapid change to maximum or minimum output;

  • .3 uncontrolled or varying output;

  • .4 premature operation;

  • .5 failure to operate at a prescribed time; and

  • .6 failure to cease operation at a prescribed time.

Depending on the system under consideration, other failure modes may have to be taken into account.

  4.4 If a system can fail without any hazardous or catastrophic effect, there is no need to conduct a detailed FMEA into the system architecture. For systems whose individual failure can cause hazardous or catastrophic effects and where a redundant system is not provided, a detailed FMEA as described in the following paragraphs shall be followed. Results of the system functional failure analysis shall be documented and confirmed by a practical test programme drawn up from the analysis.

  4.5 Where a system, the failure of which may cause a hazardous or catastrophic effect, is provided with a redundant system, a detailed FMEA may not be required provided that:

  • .1 the redundant system can be put into operation or can take over the failed system within the time-limit dictated by the most onerous operational mode in 4.2 without hazarding the craft;

  • .2 the redundant system is completely independent from the system and does not share any common system element the failure of which would cause failure of both the system and the redundant system. Common system element may be acceptable if the probability of failure complies with section 13; and

  • .3 the redundant system may share the same power source as the system. In such case an alternative power source shall be readily available with regard to the requirement of .1.

The probability and effects of operator error to bring in the redundant system shall also be considered.


Copyright 2022 Clasifications Register Group Limited, International Maritime Organization, International Labour Organization or Maritime and Coastguard Agency. All rights reserved. Clasifications Register Group Limited, its affiliates and subsidiaries and their respective officers, employees or agents are, individually and collectively, referred to in this clause as 'Clasifications Register'. Clasifications Register assumes no responsibility and shall not be liable to any person for any loss, damage or expense caused by reliance on the information or advice in this document or howsoever provided, unless that person has signed a contract with the relevant Clasifications Register entity for the provision of this information or advice and in that case any responsibility or liability is exclusively on the terms and conditions set out in that contract.