2.1.1 An
FMEA is to be carried out in accordance with Pt 5, Ch 22, 2.1 General 2.1.2 to Pt 5, Ch 22, 2.1 General 2.1.7 for the propulsion systems,
electrical power supply systems and steering systems to demonstrate
that a single failure in active equipment or loss of an associated
sub-system, see
Pt 5, Ch 22, 1.1 General 1.1.3,
will not cause loss of all propulsion and/or steering capability as
required by a class notation. Typical sub-systems include associated
control and monitoring arrangements, data communications, power supplies
(electrical, hydraulic or pneumatic), fuel, lubricating, cooling,
etc.
2.1.2 The
FMEA is to be carried out using the format presented in Table 22.2.1 Failure Mode and Effects
Analysis or an equivalent format
that addresses the same safety issues. Analyses in accordance with
IEC 60812, Analysis techniques for system reliability –
Procedure for failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) or IMO
MSC Resolution 36(63) Annex 4 – Procedures for Failure
Mode and Effects Analysis, would be acceptable.
2.1.3 The
FMEA is to be organised in terms of equipment and function. The effects
of item failures at a stated level and at higher levels are to be
analysed to determine the effects on the system as a whole. Actions
for mitigation are to be determined.
2.1.4 The
FMEA is to:
-
identify the
equipment or sub-system, mode of operation and the equipment;
-
identify potential
failure modes and their causes;
-
evaluate the
effects on the system of each failure mode;
-
identify measures
for reducing the risks associated with each failure mode; and
-
identify trials
and testing necessary to prove conclusions.
2.1.5 At
sub-system level it is acceptable, for the purpose of these Rules,
to consider failure of equipment items and their functions, e.g. failure
of a pump to produce flow or pressure head. It is not required that
the failure of components within that pump be analysed. In addition,
their failure need only be dealt with as a cause of failure of the
pump.
2.1.6 Where
FMEA is used for consideration of systems that depend on software-based
functions for control or co-ordination, the analysis is to investigate
failure of the functions rather than a specific analysis of the software
code itself.
Table 22.2.1 Failure Mode and Effects
Analysis
Project: Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
|
System:
|
Element:
|
Sheet No:
|
Item No.
|
Component
Description
|
Function
|
Mode of
Operation
|
Failure Mode
|
Failure Cause
|
Failure
Detection
|
Effect of Failure
|
Severity
|
Corrective
Action
|
Remarks
|
On Item
|
On System
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note The 'severity category' is to be in accordance with the
following: (a) Catastrophic; (b) Hazardous; (c) Major; or
(d) Minor.
|
2.1.7 The
FMEA is to establish that in the event of a single failure:
-
for PSMR and PSMR
notations, that the ship will retain not less than 50
per cent of the installed prime mover capacity and not less than 50
per cent of the installed propulsion systems and retain steering capability;
-
for PMR and PMR
notations, that the ship will retain not less than 50
per cent of the installed prime mover capacity and not less than 50
per cent of the installed propulsion systems;
-
for SMR and SMR
notations, that the steering capability remains available;
-
for PSMRL
notation, that the ship will retain the ability to use
available installed prime mover capacity and installed propulsion
systems that are not directly affected by the failure and retain steering
capability at a service speed of not less than seven knots; and
-
for PMRL
notation, that the ship will retain the ability to use
available installed prime mover capacity and installed propulsion
systems that are not directly affected by the failure.