Section
5 Components
5.1 Piping system requirements
5.1.1
Piping scantlings
- Piping systems shall be designed in accordance with recognised
Standards.
- The following criteria shall be used for determining
pipe wall thickness.
The wall thickness of pipes shall not
be less than:
where
t
o
|
= |
theoretical thickness |
t
o
|
= |
|
with
D
|
= |
outside diameter (mm) |
e
|
= |
efficiency factor equal to 1,0 for seamless pipes
and for longitudinally or spirally welded pipes, delivered by
approved manufacturers of welded pipes, that are considered
equivalent to seamless pipes when non destructive testing on
welds is carried out in accordance with Recognised Standards. In
other cases an efficiency factor of less than 1,0, in accordance
with recognised Standards, may be required depending on the
manufacturing process |
b
|
= |
allowance for bending (mm). The value of b
should be chosen so that the calculated stress in the bend, due
to internal pressure only, does not exceed the allowable stress.
Where such justification is not given, b should be: |
b
|
= |
|
with
r
|
= |
mean radius of the bend (mm) |
c
|
= |
corrosion allowance (mm). If corrosion or erosion
is expected the wall thickness of the piping shall be increased
over that required by other design requirements. This allowance
shall be consistent with the expected life of the piping |
a
|
= |
negative manufacturing tolerance for thickness (per
cent). |
5.1.2 The minimum wall thickness shall be in accordance with recognised
Standards.
5.1.3 Where necessary for mechanical strength to prevent damage, collapse,
excessive sag or buckling of pipes due to superimposed loads, the wall thickness
shall be increased over that required by Pt 11, Ch 5, 5.1 Piping system requirements 5.1.1.(b) or, if this is impracticable or would cause
excessive local stresses, these loads shall be reduced, protected against or
eliminated by other design methods. Such superimposed loads may be due to;
supporting structures, deflections of the ship unit, liquid pressure surge during
transfer operations, the weight of suspended valves, reaction to loading arm
connections, or otherwise.
5.1.4
Flanges, valves and fittings
- Flanges, valves and other fittings shall comply with recognised
Standards, taking into account the material selected and the design pressure
defined in Pt 11, Ch 5, 2.1 Design pressure. For bellows expansion
joints used in vapour service, a lower minimum design pressure may be
accepted.
- For flanges not complying with a recognised Standard, the
dimensions of flanges and related bolts shall be to the satisfaction of
LR.
- All emergency shutdown valves shall be of the ‘fail-closed’
type. (See
Pt 11, Ch 5, 6.2 Testing requirements 6.2.1.(a) and Pt 11, Ch 18, 4.2 ESD valve requirements).
- The design and installation of expansion bellows shall be in
accordance with recognised Standards and be fitted with means to prevent
damage due to over-extension or compression.
5.1.5
Ship unit cargo hoses
- Liquid and vapour hoses used for cargo transfer shall be
compatible with the cargo and suitable for the cargo temperature.
- Hoses subject to tank pressure, or the discharge pressure of
pumps or vapour compressors, shall be designed for a bursting pressure not
less than five times the maximum pressure the hose will be subjected to
during cargo transfer.
- Each new type of cargo hose, complete with end fittings, shall
be prototype-tested at a normal ambient temperature, with 200 pressure
cycles from zero to at least twice the specified maximum working pressure.
After this cycle pressure test has been carried out, the prototype test
shall demonstrate a bursting pressure of at least 5 times its specified
maximum working pressure at the upper and lower extreme service temperature.
Hoses used for prototype testing shall not be used for cargo service.
Thereafter, before being placed in service, each new length of cargo hose
produced shall be hydrostatically tested at ambient temperature to a
pressure not less than 1,5 times its specified maximum working pressure, but
not more than two fifths of its bursting pressure. The hose shall be
stencilled or otherwise marked with the date of testing, its specified
maximum working pressure and, if used in services other than ambient
temperature services, its maximum and minimum service temperature, as
applicable. The specified maximum working pressure shall not be less than 1
MPa.
5.2 Stress aspects
5.2.1
Allowable stress
- For pipes, the allowable stress to be considered in the formula
for t in Pt 11, Ch 5, 5.1 Piping system requirements 5.1.1.(b) is the lower of the following values:
Rm/A or Re/B
where
Rm
|
= |
specified minimum tensile strength at room
temperature (N/mm2) |
Re
|
= |
specified minimum yield stress at room temperature
(N/mm2). If the stress strain curve does not show
a defined yield stress, the 0,2 per cent proof stress applies. |
The values of A and B shall have values of
at least A = 2,7 and B = 1,8.
5.2.2
High pressure gas fuel outer pipes or ducting scantlings
- In fuel gas piping systems of design pressure greater than the
critical pressure, the tangential membrane stress of a straight section of
pipe or ducting shall not exceed the tensile strength divided by 1,5 (i.e.
Rm
/1,5) when subjected to the design pressure specified in Pt 11, Ch 5, 2.2 Cargo system valve requirements 2.2.1. The pressure ratings of all other piping components
shall reflect the same level of strength as straight pipes.
5.2.3
Stress analysis
- When the cargo design temperature is –110°C or colder, a
complete stress analysis, taking into account all the stresses due to weight
of pipes, including acceleration loads if significant, internal pressure,
thermal contraction and loads induced by hogging and sagging of the ship
unit for each branch of the piping system shall be submitted to LR. For
temperatures above –110°C, a stress analysis may be required by LR in
relation to such matters as the design or stiffness of the piping system and
the choice of materials. In any case, consideration should be given to
thermal stresses even though calculations are not submitted. The analysis
may be carried out according to a Code of Practice acceptable to LR.
|