Section
2 General hull requirements for navigation in ice – All ice
classes
2.1 General
2.1.1 The
following Sections are to be complied with for all Ice Classes, where
applicable. Alternative arrangements to attain similar performance
will be specially considered.
2.1.2 The
ballast capacity of the ship is to be sufficient to give adequate
propeller immersion in all ice navigating conditions without trimming
the ship in such a manner that the actual waterline at the bow is
below the lower ice waterline.
2.1.3 Fresh
water and sea-water ballast tanks, the tops of which are situated
above the design ballast waterline and adjacent to the shell, which
are intended to be used in ice and cold navigating conditions, are
to be provided with means to prevent freezing. Measures are to be
provided to demonstrate that they protect against the following:
-
hull structural
damage from pumping water creating a vacuum beneath a layer of ice
across the top of the water in the tank, and
-
hull structural
damage from ice expansion, and
-
engineering systems,
such as piping systems and components, damage from ice expansion or
ice blockage, and
-
engineering systems,
such as piping systems and components, damage from ice pieces melting
or dislodging from upper sections of the tank.
Heating coils are considered an effective means for tanks entirely
above the waterline. Heating coils or other effective means such as
continuous circulation, air bubbling and/or tank pressure/engineering
systems alarms are considered effective for tanks partially below
the waterline. Alternatively, demonstration that the above hazards
have been mitigated is to be submitted through theoretical calculations,
service experience, experimental tests, or a combination thereof.
2.1.4 These
Rules are formulated for both transverse and longitudinal framing
systems but it is recommended that, whenever practicable, transverse
framing is selected.
2.1.5 These
Rules assume that when approaching ice infested waters, the ship's
speed will be reduced appropriately. The vertical extent of ice strengthening
for ships intended to operate at speeds exceeding 15 knots in areas
containing isolated ice floes will be specially considered.
2.1.6 An icebreaking
ship is to have a hull form at the fore end adapted to break ice effectively.
It is recommended that bulbous bows are not fitted to Ice Class
1AS ships.
2.1.7 The
stern of an icebreaking ship is to have a form such that broken ice
is effectively displaced.
2.1.8 Where
it is desired to make provision for short tow operations, the bow
area is to be suitably reinforced. Similarly, icebreakers may require
local reinforcement in way of the stern fork.
2.1.9 Shell
strakes in way of ice strengthening area for plates are to be grade
B/AH.
2.1.10 To
prevent unintended contact and permit close tow operations, provision
of a bow ice knife (plate fitted between stem and bulbous bow) is
not recommended for ships intended to navigate with icebreaker escort.
2.2 Definitions
2.2.1 The
upper and lower ice waterlines upon which the design of the vessel
has been based is to be indicated in the classification certificate.
The upper ice waterline (UIWL) is to be defined by the maximum draughts
fore, amidships and aft. The lower ice waterline (LIWL) is to be defined
by the minimum draughts fore, amidships and aft.
2.2.2 The
lower ice waterline is to be determined with due regard to the vessel's
ice-going capability in the ballast loading conditions (e.g. propeller
submergence).
2.2.3 The
upper ice waterline (UIWL) and lower ice waterline (LIWL) are to be
indicated on the plans. For navigation in certain geographical areas,
the relevant National Authority may require the maximum Ice Class
draught to be marked on the ship in a specified manner.
2.2.4
Displacement ∆ is the displacement at the upper ice waterline (UIWL)
when floating in water having a relative density of 1,0. For first-year
ice class Rules, the displacement is in tonnes. For multi-year ice
class Rules, the displacement is in kilo tonnes.
2.2.5
Shaft
power, P
0 , is the maximum propulsion
shaft power, in kW, for which the machinery is to be classed.
2.3 Rudder and steering arrangements
2.3.1 Rudder stoppers working on the rudder blade or rudder head are to be fitted
to ships assigned the notations Ice Class 1AS FS, 1AS FS(+), 1A FS,
1A FS(+) and to ships assigned Polar Class (PC) notations.
2.3.2 The design ice force on the rudder, based on the maximum rudder torque, shall be
transmitted to the rudder stoppers without damage to the steering system.
2.3.4 Rudder stoppers are to be arranged such that protection of the steering gear is provided
two degrees before the maximum travel of the steering gear.
2.3.5 The steering gear, rudder stock and upper edge of the rudder are to be protected from
loads from ice impact when operating astern. A robust ice knife or equivalent means of
protecting the rudder head and upper edge of the rudder is to be fitted to ships
assigned the notations Ice Class 1AS FS, 1A FS, and to ships assigned
Polar Class (PC) notations.
2.3.6 The width of the ice knife shall provide protection to the rudder two
degrees either side of the centreline. The lower edge of the ice knife should extend
below the upper edge of the rudder’s trailing edge or lower ice waterline, whichever is
the lowest. For a ship with large draught variations, the ice knife shall extend below
the upper edge of the rudder’s trailing edge.
2.3.7 The design force for the ice knife, Fk, shall be
determined as Fk = p h l, where p is the ice pressure
and h is the ice load height calculated according to the stern hull area
according to the requirements of the Finnish-Swedish Ice Class Rules for ships
assigned the notations Ice Class 1AS FS, 1A FS or Pt 8, Ch 2, 10.7 Design load patch and Pt 8, Ch 2, 10.8 Pressure within the design load patch for ships assigned Polar Class (PC) notations respectively. The
load length, l, is to be considered according to the ice knife construction, but in
general is to be taken as the support frame transverse spacing.
2.3.8 For the Ice Classes 1AS FS,1A FS and Polar Class (PC)
notations, due regard is to be paid to the excessive load caused by the rudder
being forced out of the midship position when backing into an ice ridge. When vessels
are intended to operate with significant time in astern operation, then the hull
strength is to be based on the method used in the forward region; however, due
consideration may be given to the anticipated power in this mode of operation.
2.3.9 For plated structures, the thickness of the boundaries of the ice knife
structure is not to be less than that of the rudder side plating.
Table 2.2.1 Allowable stress in rudder
stopper, ice knife and supporting structure in way of rudder stopper, ice
knife
|
Von Mises stress,
in N/mm2
|
Shear stress, in
N/mm2
|
Allowable
Stress
|
235/k
|
138/k,
see Note 1
|
Where
k = 235 /
s0
s0 =
specified minimum yield stress of the material, in
N/mm2
Note 1. When the direct calculation is based on beam theory, the allowable
shear stress must be not be greater than 122/k.
|
|