Section
6 Tank types
6.1 Type A independent tanks
6.1.1
Design basis
- Type A independent tanks are tanks primarily designed using
classical ship-structural analysis procedures. Type A independent tanks are
to be designed in accordance with Pt 11, Ch 4, 5.2 Construction processes 5.2.3 and Pt 11, Ch 4, 5.2 Construction processes 5.2.4. Where such tanks are primarily constructed
of plane surfaces, the design vapour pressure Po shall be
less than 0,07 MPa.
- If the cargo temperature at atmospheric pressure is below –10°C,
a complete secondary barrier is required as defined in Pt 11, Ch 4, 2.3 Secondary barriers in relation to tank types. The secondary barrier shall be designed in accordance
with Pt 11, Ch 4, 2.4 Design of secondary barriers.
6.1.2
Structural analysis
- A structural analysis shall be performed taking into account the
internal pressure as indicated in Pt 11, Ch 4, 3.3 Functional loads 3.3.2, and the interaction loads with the supporting and
keying system as well as a reasonable part of the hull of the ship unit.
- For parts such as supporting structures not otherwise covered by
the requirements of this Part, stresses shall be determined by direct
calculations, taking into account the loads referred to in Pt 11, Ch 4, 3.2 Permanent loads to Pt 11, Ch 4, 3.5 Accidental loads as far as applicable, and the deflection of the ship
unit in way of supporting structures.
- The tanks with supports shall be designed for the accidental
loads specified in Pt 11, Ch 4, 3.5 Accidental loads. These loads need not be combined with each other or
with environmental loads.
6.1.3
Symbols:
b
|
= |
width of plating supported, in metres |
f
|
= |
1,1 – but need not exceed 1,0 |
fs
|
= |
2,7 for nickel steels and carbon manganese steels |
= |
3,9 for austenitic steels and aluminium alloys |
h
|
= |
vertical distance, from the middle of the effective span of
stiffener or transverse to the top of the tank, in metres |
lt, ls, lb,
lc are effective spans measured according to Figure 4.6.1 Measurement of
spans
ρ |
= |
maximum density of the cargo, in kg/m3, at the cargo
design temperature |
tp
|
= |
thickness, in mm, of the attached load bearing plating. Where
this varies over the effective width of plating, the mean thickness is to be
used |
s
|
= |
spacing of bulkhead stiffeners, in mm |
S
|
= |
spacing of primary members, in metres |
Sw and s1 are as defined in Figure 10.5.1 Bracket toe construction in Pt 3, Ch 10, 5.2 Arrangements at intersections of continuous secondary and primary members of the Rules for Ships.
6.1.4 The scantlings of Type A independent tanks are to comply with the
following:
- Minimum thickness.
No
part of the cargo tank structure is to be less than 7,5 mm in thickness.
- Boundary plating.
The
thickness of plating forming the boundaries of cargo tanks is to be not
less than 7,5 mm, nor less than:
mm
NOTE
An additional corrosion allowance of 1 mm is to be added
to the thickness derived if the cargo is of corrosive nature, see
also
Pt 11, Ch 4, 2.1 Functional requirements 2.1.6 and Pt 11, Ch 4, 2.1 Functional requirements 2.1.7.
- Rolled or built stiffeners.
The section modulus of rolled or built stiffeners on
plating forming tank boundaries is to be not less than:
cm3
- Transverses.
The
scantlings of transverse members are normally to be derived using direct
calculation methods. The structural analysis is to take account of the
internal pressure defined in Pt 11, Ch 4, 3.3 Functional loads 3.3.2.(d) and also those resulting from structural
test loading conditions. Proper account is also to be taken of
structural model end constraints, shear and axial forces present and any
interaction from the double bottom structure through the cargo tank
supports.
As an initial estimate, the scantlings of
the primary transverses may be taken as:
top
transverse
Z = 720Peq
s lt 2
k cm3
topside transverse
Z =
520Peq
s lt 2
k cm3
side transverse
Z =
560Peq
s ls 2
k cm3
bottom transverse
Z =
560Peq
s lb 2
k cm3
centreline bulkhead transverse
Z = 400Peq
s lc 2
k cm3
The depth of the bottom transverse web is generally to
be not less than lb
/4.
Web stiffening is to be in accordance with
Pt 4, Ch 9, 10.5 Primary member web plate stiffening of the Rules for Ships with the
application of the stiffening requirements as shown in Figure 4.6.1 Measurement of
spans.
- Tank end webs and girders.
The section modulus of vertical webs and horizontal girders
is to be not less than:
Z =
850Peq
bl
2
k cm3
- Internal bulkheads (perforated).
The thickness of plating is to be not less than 7,5 mm, but
may require to be increased at the tank boundaries in regions of high
local loading.
The section modulus of stiffeners,
girders and webs is to be in accordance with Pt 4, Ch 9, 8 Non-oiltight bulkheads and Pt 4, Ch 9, 9.8 Primary members supporting non-oiltight bulkheads of the Rules for Ships.
- Internal bulkheads
(non-perforated).
Where a bulkhead may be subjected to
an internal pressure head, Peq, resulting from loading
on one side only, the scantlings of plating, stiffeners and primary
members are to be determined from (b), (c) and (d).
Where no such loading condition is envisaged, the scantlings may be
derived as follows:
The thickness of plating is to be
not less than would be required for the tank boundary plating at the
corresponding tank depth and stiffener spacing, reduced by 0,5 mm. The
section modulus of stiffeners and transverses is to be derived from (c)
or (d), respectively, but Peq need not exceed:
MPa
- Tank crown structure.
Where the minimum thickness of tank boundary plating (7,5 mm) has been
adopted, the section moduli of associated stiffeners and transverses are
to be derived as above, but P
eq is to be not less than that equivalent to the minimum
thickness, that is:
MPa
The tank crown plating and
stiffeners are also to be suitable for a head equivalent to the tank
test air pressure where the tank is to be hydro-pneumatically tested.
- Connection of stiffeners to primary
supporting members.
In assessing the arrangement at
intersections of continuous secondary and primary members, the
requirements of Pt 3, Ch 10, 5.2 Arrangements at intersections of continuous secondary and primary members are to be complied with
using the requirements for ‘other ship types’. The total load, P,
in kN, is to be derived using the internal pressure head,
Peq, in MPa as given by Pt 11, Ch 4, 3.3 Functional loads 3.3.2.(d) and the following formulae:
- In general:
P = 1000 (S
w – 0,5s1)s1
Peq kN
- For wash bulkheads:
P = 1200 (S
w – 0,5s1)s1
Peq kN.
6.1.5
On-site operation design condition
- For tanks primarily constructed of plane surfaces, the nominal
membrane stresses for primary and secondary members (stiffeners, web frames,
stringers, girders), when calculated by classical analysis procedures, shall
not exceed the lower of R
m/2,66 or Re/1,33 for nickel steels,
carbon-manganese steels, austenitic steels and aluminium alloys, where
Rm and Re are defined in Pt 11, Ch 4, 4.3 Design conditions 4.3.2.(c).
However, if detailed
calculations are carried out for the primary members, the equivalent
stress σc, as defined in Pt 11, Ch 4, 4.3 Design conditions 4.3.2.(d), may be increased over that indicated
above to a stress acceptable to LR. Calculations shall take into account
the effects of bending, shear, axial and torsional deformation as well
as the hull/cargo tank interaction forces due to the deflection of the
double bottom and cargo tank bottoms.
- Tank boundary scantlings shall meet at least the requirements of
LR for deep tanks taking into account the internal pressure as indicated in
Pt 11, Ch 4, 3.3 Functional loads 3.3.2 and any corrosion allowance required by
Pt 11, Ch 4, 2.1 Functional requirements 2.1.6.
- The cargo tank structure shall be reviewed against potential
buckling.
6.1.6
Accident design condition
- The tanks and the tank supports shall be designed for the
accidental loads and design conditions specified in Pt 11, Ch 4, 2.1 Functional requirements 2.1.5.(c) and Pt 11, Ch 4, 3.5 Accidental loads, as relevant.
- When subjected to the accidental loads specified in Pt 11, Ch 4, 3.5 Accidental loads, the stress shall comply with the acceptance criteria
specified in Pt 11, Ch 4, 6.1 Type A independent tanks 6.1.5, modified as appropriate taking into
account their lower probability of occurrence see
Figure 4.6.2 Hydro-pneumatic tank
testing.
6.1.7
Testing
All Type A independent tanks shall be subjected to a hydrostatic or
hydro-pneumatic test.
This test shall be performed such that the stresses approximate, as far
as practicable, the design stresses, and that the pressure at the top of the tank
corresponds at least to the MARVS. When a hydro-pneumatic test is performed, the
conditions should simulate, as far as practicable, the design loading of the tank
and of its support structure including dynamic components, while avoiding stress
levels that could cause permanent deformation.
The following equations calculate the head of water required to model
the design pressure, Peq, used in the scantling calculations of
the tank structure. If a hydro-pneumatic test is utilised, the head of water
hHP is to be taken as:
where
hHP = test head of water, in metres, measured from bottom of cargo
tank
Peq = design pressure, in MPa, at location under
consideration as derived from Pt 11, Ch 4, 3.3 Functional loads 3.3.2
P = air test pressure, in MPa
RD = ρ/ρfreshwater
ρ = density of test fluid ρfreshwater= 1000 kg/m3
at 4°C
y = the vertical distance, in metres, from bottom of tank to the
location under consideration, see
Figure 4.6.2 Hydro-pneumatic tank
testing
For a given head of water, hHP, the load, in MPa, at
the location under consideration would be:
Care is to be taken that the ratio at any point around the tank.
If a hydrostatic test is utilised, the head of water,
hHS, is to be taken as:
where
hHS = test head of water, in metres, measured above top of cargo
tank of depth h
h = height of tank as defined in Figure 4.6.2 Hydro-pneumatic tank
testing)
For a given head of water, hHS, the load, in MPa, at
the location under consideration would be:
Care is to be taken that the ratio at any point around the tank.
The test pressure is to be not less than the MARVS.
The design pressure is not to be exceeded at any point, and the test
should adequately load all areas of the tank. See also
Pt 3, Ch 1, 9.7 Definitions and details of testsin the Rules for
Ships. When testing takes place after installation of the tanks on board the ship
unit, care is to be taken that the test head does not result in excessive local
loading on the hull structure. For this purpose, when the cargo tanks are centrally
divided with a non-perforated bulkhead, consideration will be given to testing the
port and starboard sides of the tank independently.
Figure 4.6.2 Hydro-pneumatic tank
testing
6.2 Type B independent tanks
6.2.2
Structural analysis
- The effects of all dynamic and static loads shall be used to
determine the suitability of the structure with respect to:
- plastic deformation;
- buckling;
- fatigue failure;
- crack propagation.
Finite element analysis or similar methods and fracture
mechanics analysis or an equivalent approach, shall be carried
out.
- A three-dimensional analysis shall be carried out to evaluate
the stress levels, including interaction with the hull of the ship unit. The
model for this analysis shall include the cargo tank with its supporting and
keying system, as well as a reasonable part of the hull.
- A complete analysis of the particular accelerations and motions
of the ship unit in irregular waves, and of the response of the ship unit
and its cargo tanks to these forces and motions shall be performed unless
the data is available from similar ship units.
- Type B independent tanks are to be subjected to a
structural analysis by direct calculation procedures at a high
confidence level. It is recommended that the assumptions made and
the proposed calculation procedures be agreed with LR at an early
stage. Where necessary, model or other tests may be required.
- Generally, the scantlings of cargo tanks primarily
constructed of plane surfaces are not to be less than required by
Pt 11, Ch 4, 6.1 Type A independent tanks 6.1.4 for Type A independent tanks. In assessing the
cumulative effect of the fatigue load, account is to be taken of the
quality control aspects such as misalignment, distortion, fit-up and
weld shape. A 97,7 per cent survival probability S–N curve is to be
adopted in association with a cumulative damage factor C
w value of 0,1 for primary members and 0,5 for secondary
members. Alternative proposals will be specially considered.
6.2.3
On-site operation design condition
- Plastic deformation
Allowable stresses
for Type B independent tanks are to be in accordance with Pt 11, Ch 4, 6.2 Type B independent tanks 6.2.3 and (ii) as applicable.
- For Type B independent tanks,
primarily constructed of bodies of revolution, the allowable
stresses shall not exceed:
- σm ≤ f
- σL ≤ 1,5f
- σb ≤ 1,5F
- σL+σb ≤ 1,5F
- σm+σb ≤ 1,5F
- σm+σb+σg ≤
3,0F
- σL+σb+σg ≤
3,0F
where
- σm = equivalent primary general
membrane stress
- σL = equivalent primary local
membrane stress
- σb = equivalent primary bending
stress
- σg = equivalent secondary stress
-
f = the lesser of (R
m
/A) or (R
e
/B)
-
F = the lesser of (R
m
/C) or (R
e
/D)
with R
m and R
e as defined in Pt 11, Ch 4, 4.3 Design conditions 4.3.2.(c)(i). With regard to the stresses
σm, σL and σb
see also the definition of stress categories in Pt 11, Ch 4, 7.1 Guidance Notes for Chapter 4 7.1.3. The values A, B, C and D
shall have at least the minimum values shown in Pt 11, Ch 4, 6.2 Type B independent tanks 6.2.3.
- For Type B independent tanks,
primarily constructed of plane surfaces, the allowable membrane
equivalent stresses applied for finite element analysis will be
specially considered:
- The thickness of the skin plate and the size of the
stiffener shall not be less than those required for Type A
independent tanks.
Table 4.6.1 Factors
for determining allowable stress for Type B independent
tanks
|
Nickel steel and carbon
manganese steels
|
Austenitic
steels
|
Aluminium
alloys
|
A
|
3
|
3,5
|
4
|
B
|
2
|
1,6
|
1,5
|
C
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
D
|
1,5
|
1,5
|
1,5
|
- Buckling
Buckling strength analyses of
cargo tanks subject to external pressure and other loads causing
compressive stresses shall be carried out in accordance with recognised
standards. The method should adequately account for the difference in
theoretical and actual buckling stress as a result of plate edge
misalignment, lack of straightness or flatness, ovality and deviation
from true circular form over a specified arc or chord length, as
applicable.
6.2.4
Fatigue design condition
- Fatigue and crack propagation assessment shall be performed in
accordance with the provisions of Pt 11, Ch 4, 4.3 Design conditions 4.3.3.
- Fatigue analysis shall consider construction tolerances.
- Where deemed necessary by the Administration, model tests may
be required to determine stress concentration factors and fatigue life of
structural elements.
6.2.5
Accident design condition
- The tanks and the tank supports shall be designed for the
accidental loads and design conditions specified in Pt 11, Ch 4, 3.3 Functional loads 3.3.9 and Pt 11, Ch 4, 3.5 Accidental loads, as relevant.
- When subjected to the accidental loads specified in Pt 11, Ch 4, 3.5 Accidental loads, the stress shall comply with the acceptance criteria
specified in Pt 11, Ch 4, 6.2 Type B independent tanks 6.2.3, modified as appropriate, taking into
account their lower probability of occurrence.
6.2.6
Testing
Type B independent tanks shall be subjected to a hydrostatic or
hydro-pneumatic test as follows:
- The test shall be performed as required in Pt 11, Ch 4, 6.1 Type A independent tanks 6.1.7 for Type A independent tanks
- In addition, the maximum primary membrane stress or maximum
bending stress in primary members under test conditions shall not exceed 90
per cent of the yield strength of the material (as fabricated) at the test
temperature. To ensure that this condition is satisfied, when calculations
indicate that this stress exceeds 75 per cent of the yield strength the
prototype test shall be monitored by the use of strain gauges or other
suitable equipment.
6.2.7
Marking
Any marking of the pressure vessel shall be achieved by a method that
does not cause unacceptable local stress raisers.
6.3 Type C independent tanks
6.3.1
Design basis
- The design basis for Type C independent tanks
is based on pressure vessel criteria modified to include fracture mechanics
and crack propagation criteria. The minimum design pressure defined in Pt 11, Ch 4, 6.3 Type C independent tanks 6.3.1.(b) is intended to ensure that the dynamic stress is
sufficiently low so that an initial surface flaw will not propagate more
than half the thickness of the shell during the lifetime of the tank.
- The design vapour pressure shall not be less
than:
P
o = 0,2 + AC(ρr)1,5 (MPa)
where:
with
σm
|
= |
design primary membrane stress |
ΔσA
|
= |
allowable dynamic membrane stress (double amplitude
at probability level Q = 10–8) |
= |
55 N/mm2 for ferritic-perlitic,
martensitic and austenitic steel |
= |
25 N/mm2 for aluminium alloy (5083-O) |
C
|
= |
a characteristic tank dimension to be taken as the
greatest of the following: h, 0,75b or
0,45l
|
with
h
|
= |
height of tank (dimension in ship unit’s vertical
direction) (m) |
b
|
= |
width of tank (dimension in ship unit’s transverse
direction) (m) |
l
|
= |
length of tank (dimension in ship unit’s
longitudinal direction) (m) |
ρr
|
= |
the relative density of the cargo (ρr = 1
for fresh water) at the cargo design temperature |
When a specified design life of the tank is longer than
108 wave encounters ΔσA shall be modified to
give equivalent crack propagation corresponding to the design life.
- Alternative means of calculating the design vapour pressure
referred to in (b) will be accepted.
- The Administration may allocate a tank complying with the
criteria of Type C, minimum design pressure as in (b), to a Type A or Type
B, dependent on the configuration of the tank and the arrangement of its
supports and attachments.
- Before construction of the pressure vessels is commenced, the
following particulars, where applicable, and plans are to be submitted for
approval:
- Nature of cargoes, together with maximum vapour
pressures and minimum liquid temperature for which the pressure
vessels are to be approved, and proposed hydraulic test
pressure.
- Particulars of materials proposed for the construction
of the vessels.
- Particulars of refrigeration equipment.
- General arrangement plan showing location of pressure
vessels in the ship unit.
- Plans of pressure vessels showing attachments, openings,
dimensions, details of welded joints and particulars of proposed
stress relief heat treatment.
- Plans of seatings, securing arrangements and deck
sealing arrangements.
- Plans showing arrangement of mountings, level gauges and
number, type and size of safety valves.
6.3.2
Shell thickness
- The shell thickness shall be as follows:
- For pressure vessels, the thickness calculated according
to (e) shall be considered as a minimum thickness after forming,
without any negative tolerance.
- For pressure vessels, the minimum thickness of shell and
heads including corrosion allowance, after forming, shall not be
less than 5 mm for carbon-manganese steels and nickel steels, 3 mm
for austenitic steels or 7 mm for aluminium alloys.
- The welded joint efficiency factor
to be used in the calculation according to (e) shall be 0,95 when
the inspection and the non-destructive testing referred to in Pt 11, Ch 6 Materials of Construction and Quality Control are carried
out. This value may be increased up to 1,0 when account is taken of
other considerations, such as the material used, type of joints,
welding procedure and type of loading. For process pressure vessels
LR may accept partial non-destructive examinations, but not less
than those of Pt 11, Ch 6 Materials of Construction and Quality Control , depending on
such factors as the material used, the cargo design temperature, the
nil-ductility transition temperature of the material as fabricated
and the type of joint and welding procedure, but in this case an
efficiency factor of not more than 0,85 should be adopted. For
special materials the above-mentioned factors shall be reduced,
depending on the specified mechanical properties of the welded
joint.
- The design liquid pressure defined in Pt 11, Ch 4, 3.3 Functional loads 3.3.2 shall be taken into account in the internal pressure
calculations.
- The thickness of pressure parts subject to internal pressure
is to be in accordance with Pt 5, Ch 11 Other Pressure Vessels of the Rules and Regulations for the Classification of Ships, July 2022 except that:
- the welded joint efficiency factor, J, is to be
as defined in (a)(iii) above;
- the allowable stress is to be in accordance with Pt 11, Ch 4, 6.3 Type C independent tanks 6.3.3;
- the constant thickness increment (0,75 mm) included in
the formulae in Pt 5, Ch 11, 2 Cylindrical shells and drums subject to internal pressure of the Rules and Regulations for the Classification of Ships, July 2022 may require to be
increased in accordance with Pt 11, Ch 4, 2.1 Functional requirements 2.1.6.
- The design external pressure Pe
, used for verifying the buckling of the pressure vessels, shall not be
less than that given by:
Pe
|
= |
P1 + P2 + P3 +
P4 (MPa) |
where
P1
|
= |
setting value of vacuum relief valves. For vessels
not fitted with vacuum relief valves P1
shall be specially considered, but shall not in general be
taken as less than 0,025 MPa |
P2
|
= |
the set pressure of the pressure relief valves
(PRVs) for completely closed spaces containing pressure vessels
or parts of pressure vessels; elsewhere P2
= 0 |
P3
|
= |
compressive actions in or on the shell due to the
weight and contraction of thermal insulation, weight of shell
including corrosion allowance and other miscellaneous external
pressure loads to which the pressure vessel may be subjected.
These include, but are not limited to, weight of domes, weight
of towers and piping, effect of product in the partially filled
condition, accelerations and hull deflection. In addition, the
local effect of external or internal pressures or both shall be
taken into account |
P4
|
= |
external pressure due to head of water for pressure
vessels or part of pressure vessels on exposed decks;
elsewhere P4
= 0. |
- Scantlings based on internal pressure shall
be calculated as follows:
The thickness and form of
pressure-containing parts of pressure vessels, under internal pressure,
as defined in Pt 11, Ch 4, 3.3 Functional loads 3.3.2, including flanges, should be determined. These
calculations shall in all cases be based on accepted pressure vessel
design theory. Openings in pressure-containing parts of pressure vessels
shall be reinforced in accordance with recognised Standards.
- Stress analysis in respect of static and dynamic loads shall be
performed as follows:
- Pressure vessel scantlings shall be determined in
accordance with (a) to (e) and Pt 11, Ch 4, 6.3 Type C independent tanks 6.3.3.
- Calculations of the loads and stresses in way of the
supports and the shell attachment of the support shall be made.
Loads referred to in Pt 11, Ch 4, 3.2 Permanent loads to Pt 11, Ch 4, 3.5 Accidental loads shall be used, as applicable. Stresses in way of
the supporting structures shall be to a recognised standard
acceptable to LR. In special cases a fatigue analysis may be
required by LR.
- If required by LR, secondary stresses and thermal
stresses shall be specially considered.
6.3.3
On-site operation design condition
- Plastic deformation
For Type C independent tanks, the allowable stresses shall not exceed:
- σm ≤ f
- σL ≤ 1,5f
- σb ≤ 1,5f
- σL+σb ≤ 1,5f
- σm+σb ≤ 1,5f
- σm+σb+σg ≤
3,0f
- σL+σb+σg ≤
3,0f
where
σm
|
= |
equivalent primary general membrane stress |
σL
|
= |
equivalent primary local membrane stress |
σb
|
= |
equivalent primary bending stress |
σg
|
= |
equivalent secondary stress |
f
|
= |
the lesser of (Rm/A ) or
(Re/B ) |
with R
m and R
e as defined in Pt 11, Ch 4, 4.3 Design conditions 4.3.2.(c). With regard to the stresses σ m,
σ L, σ b and σ g
see also the definition of stress categories in Pt 11, Ch 4, 7.1 Guidance Notes for Chapter 4 7.1.3. The values A and B shall have at
least the minimum values shown in Table 4.6.2 Factors for
determining allowable.
Table 4.6.2 Factors for
determining allowable
|
Nickel steels
and carbon-manganese steels
|
Austenitic
steels
|
Aluminium
alloys
|
A
|
3
|
3,5
|
4
|
B
|
1,5
|
1,5
|
1,5
|
- Buckling criteria shall be as follows:
The
thickness and form of pressure vessels subject to external pressure and
other loads causing compressive stresses shall be based on calculations
using accepted pressure vessel buckling theory and shall adequately
account for the difference in theoretical and actual buckling stress as
a result of plate edge misalignment, ovality and deviation from true
circular form over a specified arc or chord length.
6.3.4
Fatigue design condition
For large Type C independent tanks where the cargo at atmospheric
pressure is below –55°C, LR may require additional verification to check their
compliance with Pt 11, Ch 4, 6.3 Type C independent tanks 6.3.1, regarding static and dynamic stress.
6.3.5
Accident design condition
- The tanks and the tank supporting structures shall be designed
for the accidental loads and design conditions specified in Pt 11, Ch 4, 2.1 Functional requirements 2.1.5.(c)(i) and Pt 11, Ch 4, 3.5 Accidental loads, as relevant.
- When subjected to the accidental loads specified in Pt 11, Ch 4, 3.5 Accidental loads, the stress shall comply with the acceptance criteria
specified in Pt 11, Ch 4, 6.3 Type C independent tanks 6.3.3, modified as appropriate taking into account
their lower probability of occurrence.
6.3.6
Testing
- Each pressure vessel shall be subjected to a
hydrostatic test at a pressure measured at the top of the tanks, of not less
than 1,5 P
o. In no case during the pressure test shall the calculated
primary membrane stress at any point exceed 90 per cent of the yield stress
of the material. To ensure that this condition is satisfied where
calculations indicate that this stress will exceed 0,75 times the yield
strength, the prototype test shall be monitored by the use of strain gauges
or other suitable equipment in pressure vessels other than simple
cylindrical and spherical pressure vessels.
- The temperature of the water used for the test shall be at least
30°C above the nil-ductility transition temperature of the material, as
fabricated.
- The pressure shall be held for 2 hours per
25 mm of thickness, but in no case less than 2 hours.
- Where necessary for cargo pressure vessels, a hydro-pneumatic
test may be carried out under the conditions prescribed in (a) to (c) .
- When a hydro-pneumatic test is performed, the conditions are
to simulate, so far as practicable, the actual loading of the tank and its
supports.
- Special consideration may be given to the testing of tanks in
which higher allowable stresses are used, depending on service temperature.
However, the requirements of (a) shall be fully complied with.
- After completion and assembly, each pressure vessel and its
related fittings shall be subjected to an adequate tightness test, which may
be performed in combination with the pressure testing referred to in Pt 11, Ch 4, 6.2 Type B independent tanks 6.2.6.
- Pneumatic testing of pressure vessels other than cargo tanks
shall only be considered on an individual case basis. Such testing shall
only be permitted for those vessels designed or supported such that they
cannot be safely filled with water, or for those vessels that cannot be
dried and are to be used in a service where traces of the testing medium
cannot be tolerated.
6.3.7
Marking
The required marking of the pressure vessel shall be achieved by a
method that does not cause unacceptable local stress raisers.
6.4 Membrane tanks
6.4.1
Design basis
- The design basis for membrane containment systems is that
thermal and other expansion or contraction is compensated for without undue
risk of losing the tightness of the membrane.
- A systematic approach, based on analysis and
testing, shall be used to demonstrate that the system will provide its
intended function in consideration of the identified in service events as
specified in Pt 11, Ch 4, 6.4 Membrane tanks 6.4.2.
- If the cargo temperature at atmospheric pressure is below –10°C
a complete secondary barrier is required as defined in Pt 11, Ch 4, 2.3 Secondary barriers in relation to tank types. The secondary barrier shall be designed according to
Pt 11, Ch 4, 2.4 Design of secondary barriers.
- The design vapour pressure P
o shall not normally exceed 0,025 MPa. If the hull scantlings are
increased accordingly and consideration is given, where appropriate, to the
strength of the supporting thermal insulation, P
o may be increased to a higher value but less than 0,07 MPa.
- The definition of membrane tanks does not exclude designs such
as those in which non-metallic membranes are used or where membranes are
included or incorporated into the thermal insulation.
- The thickness of the membranes is normally not to exceed 10
mm.
- The circulation of inert gas throughout the primary insulation
space and the secondary insulation space, in accordance with Pt 11, Ch 9, 1.2 Atmosphere control within the hold spaces (cargo containment systems other than Type C independent tanks)
1.2.1, shall be sufficient to allow for effective means of gas
detection.
6.4.2
Design considerations
- Potential incidents that could lead to loss
of fluid tightness over the life of the membranes shall be evaluated. These
include, but are not limited to:
- Ultimate design events
- Tensile failure of membranes.
- Compressive collapse of thermal insulation.
- Thermal ageing.
- Loss of attachment between thermal insulation
and hull structure.
- Loss of attachment of membranes to thermal
insulation system.
- Structural integrity of internal structures and
their supports.
- Failure of the supporting hull structure.
- Fatigue design events
- Fatigue of membranes including joints and
attachments to hull structure.
- Fatigue cracking of thermal insulation.
- Fatigue of internal structures and their
supports.
- Fatigue cracking of inner hull leading to
ballast water ingress.
- Accident design events
- Accidental mechanical damage (such as dropped
objects inside the tank while in service).
- Accidental over-pressurisation of thermal
insulation spaces.
- Accidental vacuum in the tank.
- Water ingress through the inner hull
structure.
Designs where a single internal event could
cause simultaneous or cascading failure of both membranes are
unacceptable.
- The necessary physical properties (mechanical, thermal,
chemical, etc.) of the materials used in the construction of the cargo
containment system shall be established during the design development in
accordance with Pt 11, Ch 4, 6.4 Membrane tanks 6.4.1.(b).
-
Loads, load combinations
Particular consideration shall be paid to the possible loss
of tank integrity due to either an overpressure in the interbarrier
space, a possible vacuum in the cargo tank, the sloshing effects, to
hull vibration effects, or any combination of these events.
- Structural analyses
- Structural analyses and/or testing
for the purpose of determining the strength and fatigue assessments
of the cargo containment and associated structures, e.g. structures
as defined in Pt 11, Ch 4, 2.7 Associated structure and equipment shall be performed. The structural analysis
shall provide the data required to assess each failure mode that has
been identified as critical for the cargo containment system.
- Structural analyses of the hull
shall take into account the internal pressure as indicated in Pt 11, Ch 4, 3.3 Functional loads 3.3.2. Special attention shall be paid to deflections
of the hull and their compatibility with the membrane and associated
thermal insulation.
- The analyses referred to in Pt 11, Ch 4, 6.4 Membrane tanks 6.4.2.(d).(i) and Pt 11, Ch 4, 6.4 Membrane tanks 6.4.2.(d).(ii) shall be based on the particular motions,
accelerations and response of ship units and cargo containment
systems.
- The hull structure supporting the membrane tank is to
be incorporated into the structural finite element model of the ship
unit. The scantlings of the inner hull are to be not less than
required by Pt 10 Ship Units.
- Strength analysis is also to be carried out for
structures inside the tank, i.e. pump towers, and its attachments.
This should take account of hydrodynamic loads due to the sloshing
motion of the cargo, inertia loading due to the accelerations of the
vessel, and thermal effects due to loading and unloading of the
tanks in accordance with the operational philosophy. The assessment
is to consider stress levels, including shear stresses in the welds,
buckling, fatigue (including fatigue due to thermal effects), and
vibration.
6.4.3
On-site operation design condition
- The structural resistance of every critical component,
sub-system, or assembly, shall be established, in accordance with Pt 11, Ch 4, 6.4 Membrane tanks 6.4.1.(b), for in-service conditions.
- The choice of strength acceptance criteria for the failure modes
of the cargo containment system, its attachments to the hull structure and
internal tank structures, shall reflect the consequences associated with the
considered mode of failure.
- The inner hull scantlings shall meet the requirements for deep
tanks, taking into account the internal pressure as indicated in Pt 11, Ch 4, 3.3 Functional loads 3.3.2 and the specified appropriate requirements for sloshing
load as defined in Pt 11, Ch 4, 3.4 Environmental loads 3.4.4.
6.4.4
Fatigue design condition
- Fatigue analysis shall be carried out for structures inside the
tank, i.e. pump towers, and for parts of membrane and pump tower
attachments, where failure development cannot be reliably detected by
continuous monitoring.
- The fatigue calculations shall be carried out in accordance with
Pt 11, Ch 4, 4.3 Design conditions 4.3.3, with relevant requirements depending on:
- The significance of the structural components with
respect to structural integrity.
- Availability for inspection.
- For structural elements for which it can be demonstrated by
tests and/or analyses that a crack will not develop to cause simultaneous or
cascading failure of both membranes, C
w shall be less than or equal to 0,5.
- Structural elements subject to periodic inspection, and where
an unattended fatigue crack can develop to cause simultaneous or cascading
failure of both membranes, shall satisfy the fatigue and fracture mechanics
requirements stated in Pt 11, Ch 4, 4.3 Design conditions 4.3.3.(h).
- Structural elements not accessible for in-service inspection,
and where a fatigue crack can develop without warning to cause simultaneous
or cascading failure of both membranes, shall satisfy the fatigue and
fracture mechanics requirements stated in Pt 11, Ch 4, 4.3 Design conditions 4.3.3.(i).
- Selected details of the containment system are to be
investigated by fatigue analysis, which should take into account
interactions with the vessel-supporting structure of the ship unit,
including local, transverse and longitudinal hull girder effects, also
pressure loading from the cargo and from ballast acting on the supporting
structure. The number of cycles of full and partial loading and unloading
are to be consistent with the operational philosophy of the unit. For
investigation of the fatigue damage sustained by the secondary barrier
following failure of the primary barrier, a simplified load distribution
over the RD, as specified in Pt 11, Ch 4, 1.1 Definitions 1.1.9, may be used, unless different project-specific
requirements apply, as described in Pt 11, Ch 4, 2.4 Design of secondary barriers 2.4.2. Project-specific requirements are to be submitted for
consideration.
- The fatigue damage factor of both the containment system and
internal structures such as pump towers is generally to be no greater than
0,5, but is to be no greater than 0,1 for any structural detail which is not
accessible for survey during the service life of the vessel and whose
failure would cause the simultaneous breach of both the primary and
secondary barrier, such as the attachment weld of the pump tower base
support.
6.4.5
Accident design condition
- The containment system and the supporting hull structure shall
be designed for the accidental loads specified in Pt 11, Ch 4, 3.5 Accidental loads. These loads need not be combined with each other or
with environmental loads.
- Additional relevant accident scenarios shall be determined
based on a risk analysis. Particular attention shall be paid to securing
devices inside of tanks.
6.4.6
Design development testing
- The design development testing required in Pt 11, Ch 4, 6.4 Membrane tanks 6.4.1.(b) should include a series of analytical and physical
models of both the primary and secondary barriers, including corners and
joints, tested to verify that they will withstand the expected combined
strains due to static, dynamic and thermal loads. This will culminate in the
construction of a prototype scaled model of the complete cargo containment
system.
Testing conditions considered in the analytical and
physical model shall represent the most extreme service conditions the
cargo containment system will be likely to encounter over its
life.
Proposed acceptance criteria for periodic
testing of secondary barriers required in Pt 11, Ch 4, 2.4 Design of secondary barriers 2.4.2 is to be based on the results of testing carried out
on the prototype scaled model.
- The fatigue performance of the membrane materials and
representative welded or bonded joints in the membranes shall be determined
by tests.
The ultimate strength and fatigue performance of
arrangements for securing the thermal insulation system to the hull
structure shall be determined by analyses or tests.
6.4.7
Testing
In ship units fitted with membrane cargo containment systems, all tanks
and other spaces that may normally contain liquid and are adjacent to the hull
structure supporting the membrane, shall be hydrostatically tested.
All hold structures supporting the membrane shall be tested for tightness
before installation of the cargo containment system.
Pipe tunnels and other compartments that do not normally contain liquid
need not be hydrostatically tested.
6.5 Integral tanks
6.5.1
Design basis
Integral tanks that form a structural part of the hull and are affected
by the loads that stress the adjacent hull structure shall comply with the
following:
- The design vapour pressure P
o as defined in Pt 11, Ch 4, 1.1 Definitions 1.1.2 shall not normally exceed 0,025 MPa. If the hull scantlings
are increased accordingly, P
o may be increased to a higher value, but less than 0,07 MPa.
- Integral tanks may be used for products provided the boiling point
of the cargo is not below –10°C. A lower temperature may be accepted by LR
subject to special consideration, but in such cases a complete secondary barrier
shall be provided.
6.5.2
Structural analysis
- On-site operation design condition
Integral tanks are to be designed and constructed in accordance with
the requirements for cargo tanks in Pt 10 Ship Units, using the actual cargo density
and additional vapour pressure.
6.5.4
Testing
All integral tanks shall be hydrostatically or hydro-pneumatically
tested. The test shall be performed so that the stresses approximate, as far as
practicable, to the design stresses and that the pressure at the top of the tank
corresponds at least to the MARVS.
6.6 Semi-membrane tanks
6.6.1
Design basis
- Semi-membrane tanks are non-self-supporting tanks when in the
loaded condition and consist of a layer, parts of which are supported
through thermal insulation by the adjacent hull structure; the rounded parts
of this layer connecting the above-mentioned supported parts are designed
also to accommodate the thermal and other expansion or contraction.
- The design vapour pressure P
o shall not normally exceed 0,025 MPa. If the hull scantlings are
increased accordingly, and consideration is given, where appropriate, to the
strength of the supporting thermal insulation, P
o may be increased to a higher value but less than 0,07 MPa.
- For semi-membrane tanks the relevant requirements in this
Section for independent tanks or for membrane tanks shall be applied as
appropriate.
- A structural analysis and other analyses and calculations
should be performed in accordance with the requirements for membrane tanks
or independent tanks as appropriate, taking into account the internal
pressure as indicated in Pt 11, Ch 4, 3.3 Functional loads 3.3.2.
- In the case of semi-membrane tanks that comply in all respects
with the requirements applicable to Type B independent tanks, except for the
manner of support, the Administration may, after special consideration,
accept a partial secondary barrier.
|